Cargando…

Systematic reviews as a “lens of evidence”: Determinants of participation in breast cancer screening

OBJECTIVE: To assess the determinants of the participation rate in breast cancer screening programs by conducting a systematic review of reviews. METHODS: We conducted a systematic search in PubMed via Medline, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane identifying the literature up to April 2019. Out of 2258 rev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mandrik, O, Tolma, E, Zielonke, N, Meheus, F, Ordóñez-Reyes, C, Severens, JL, Murillo, R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8167916/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32517538
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0969141320930743
_version_ 1783701785796411392
author Mandrik, O
Tolma, E
Zielonke, N
Meheus, F
Ordóñez-Reyes, C
Severens, JL
Murillo, R
author_facet Mandrik, O
Tolma, E
Zielonke, N
Meheus, F
Ordóñez-Reyes, C
Severens, JL
Murillo, R
author_sort Mandrik, O
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess the determinants of the participation rate in breast cancer screening programs by conducting a systematic review of reviews. METHODS: We conducted a systematic search in PubMed via Medline, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane identifying the literature up to April 2019. Out of 2258 revealed unique abstracts, we included 31 reviews, from which 25 were considered as systematic. We applied the Walsh & McPhee Systems Model of Clinical Preventive Care to systematize the determinants of screening participation. RESULTS: The reviews, mainly in high-income settings, reported a wide range for breast cancer screening participation rate: 16–90%. The determinants of breast cancer screening participation were simple low-cost interventions such as invitation letters, basic information on screening, multiple reminders, fixed appointments, prompts from healthcare professionals, and healthcare organizational factors (e.g. close proximity to screening facility). More complex interventions (such as face-to-face counselling or home visits), mass media or improved access to transport should not be encouraged by policy makers unless other information appears. The repeated participation in mammography screening was consistently high, above 62%. Previous positive experience with screening influenced the repeated participation in screening programs. The reviews were inconsistent in the use of terminology related to breast cancer screening participation, which may have contributed to the heterogeneity in the reported outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that consistent findings of systematic reviews bring more certainty into the conclusions on the effects of simple invitation techniques, fixed appointments and prompts, as well as healthcare organizational factors on promoting participation rate in screening mammography.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8167916
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81679162021-06-09 Systematic reviews as a “lens of evidence”: Determinants of participation in breast cancer screening Mandrik, O Tolma, E Zielonke, N Meheus, F Ordóñez-Reyes, C Severens, JL Murillo, R J Med Screen Review Articles OBJECTIVE: To assess the determinants of the participation rate in breast cancer screening programs by conducting a systematic review of reviews. METHODS: We conducted a systematic search in PubMed via Medline, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane identifying the literature up to April 2019. Out of 2258 revealed unique abstracts, we included 31 reviews, from which 25 were considered as systematic. We applied the Walsh & McPhee Systems Model of Clinical Preventive Care to systematize the determinants of screening participation. RESULTS: The reviews, mainly in high-income settings, reported a wide range for breast cancer screening participation rate: 16–90%. The determinants of breast cancer screening participation were simple low-cost interventions such as invitation letters, basic information on screening, multiple reminders, fixed appointments, prompts from healthcare professionals, and healthcare organizational factors (e.g. close proximity to screening facility). More complex interventions (such as face-to-face counselling or home visits), mass media or improved access to transport should not be encouraged by policy makers unless other information appears. The repeated participation in mammography screening was consistently high, above 62%. Previous positive experience with screening influenced the repeated participation in screening programs. The reviews were inconsistent in the use of terminology related to breast cancer screening participation, which may have contributed to the heterogeneity in the reported outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that consistent findings of systematic reviews bring more certainty into the conclusions on the effects of simple invitation techniques, fixed appointments and prompts, as well as healthcare organizational factors on promoting participation rate in screening mammography. SAGE Publications 2020-06-09 2021-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8167916/ /pubmed/32517538 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0969141320930743 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Review Articles
Mandrik, O
Tolma, E
Zielonke, N
Meheus, F
Ordóñez-Reyes, C
Severens, JL
Murillo, R
Systematic reviews as a “lens of evidence”: Determinants of participation in breast cancer screening
title Systematic reviews as a “lens of evidence”: Determinants of participation in breast cancer screening
title_full Systematic reviews as a “lens of evidence”: Determinants of participation in breast cancer screening
title_fullStr Systematic reviews as a “lens of evidence”: Determinants of participation in breast cancer screening
title_full_unstemmed Systematic reviews as a “lens of evidence”: Determinants of participation in breast cancer screening
title_short Systematic reviews as a “lens of evidence”: Determinants of participation in breast cancer screening
title_sort systematic reviews as a “lens of evidence”: determinants of participation in breast cancer screening
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8167916/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32517538
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0969141320930743
work_keys_str_mv AT mandriko systematicreviewsasalensofevidencedeterminantsofparticipationinbreastcancerscreening
AT tolmae systematicreviewsasalensofevidencedeterminantsofparticipationinbreastcancerscreening
AT zielonken systematicreviewsasalensofevidencedeterminantsofparticipationinbreastcancerscreening
AT meheusf systematicreviewsasalensofevidencedeterminantsofparticipationinbreastcancerscreening
AT ordonezreyesc systematicreviewsasalensofevidencedeterminantsofparticipationinbreastcancerscreening
AT severensjl systematicreviewsasalensofevidencedeterminantsofparticipationinbreastcancerscreening
AT murillor systematicreviewsasalensofevidencedeterminantsofparticipationinbreastcancerscreening