Cargando…

The cognitive and perceptual processes that affect observer performance in lung cancer detection: a scoping review

INTRODUCTION: Early detection of malignant pulmonary nodules through screening has been shown to reduce lung cancer‐related mortality by 20%. However, perceptual and cognitive factors that affect nodule detection are poorly understood. This review examines the cognitive and visual processes of vario...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Van De Luecht, Monica‐Rose, Reed, Warren Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8168065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33556995
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.456
_version_ 1783701813551169536
author Van De Luecht, Monica‐Rose
Reed, Warren Michael
author_facet Van De Luecht, Monica‐Rose
Reed, Warren Michael
author_sort Van De Luecht, Monica‐Rose
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Early detection of malignant pulmonary nodules through screening has been shown to reduce lung cancer‐related mortality by 20%. However, perceptual and cognitive factors that affect nodule detection are poorly understood. This review examines the cognitive and visual processes of various observers, with a particular focus on radiologists, during lung nodule detection. METHODS: Four databases (Medline, Embase, Scopus and PubMed) were searched to extract studies on eye‐tracking in pulmonary nodule detection. Studies were included if they used eye‐tracking to assess the search and detection of lung nodules in computed tomography or 2D radiographic imaging. Data were charted according to identified themes and synthesised using a thematic narrative approach. RESULTS: The literature search yielded 25 articles and five themes were discovered: 1 – functional visual field and satisfaction of search, 2 – expert search patterns, 3 – error classification through dwell time, 4 – the impact of the viewing environment and 5 – the effect of prevalence expectation on search. Functional visual field reduced to 2.7° in 3D imaging compared to 5° in 2D radiographs. Although greater visual coverage improved nodule detection, incomplete search was not responsible for missed nodules. Most radiological errors during lung nodule detection were decision‐making errors (30%–45%). Dwell times associated with false‐positive (FP) decisions informed feedback systems to improve diagnosis. Interruptions did not influence diagnostic performance; however, it increased viewing time by 8% and produced a 23.1% search continuation accuracy. Comparative scanning was found to increase the detection of low contrast nodules. Prevalence expectation did not directly affect diagnostic accuracy; however, decision‐making time increased by 2.32 seconds with high prevalence expectations. CONCLUSION: Visual and cognitive factors influence pulmonary nodule detection. Insights gained from eye‐tracking can inform advancements in lung screening. Further exploration of eye‐tracking in lung screening, particularly with low‐dose computed tomography (LDCT), will benefit the future of lung cancer screening.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8168065
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81680652021-06-05 The cognitive and perceptual processes that affect observer performance in lung cancer detection: a scoping review Van De Luecht, Monica‐Rose Reed, Warren Michael J Med Radiat Sci Review Articles INTRODUCTION: Early detection of malignant pulmonary nodules through screening has been shown to reduce lung cancer‐related mortality by 20%. However, perceptual and cognitive factors that affect nodule detection are poorly understood. This review examines the cognitive and visual processes of various observers, with a particular focus on radiologists, during lung nodule detection. METHODS: Four databases (Medline, Embase, Scopus and PubMed) were searched to extract studies on eye‐tracking in pulmonary nodule detection. Studies were included if they used eye‐tracking to assess the search and detection of lung nodules in computed tomography or 2D radiographic imaging. Data were charted according to identified themes and synthesised using a thematic narrative approach. RESULTS: The literature search yielded 25 articles and five themes were discovered: 1 – functional visual field and satisfaction of search, 2 – expert search patterns, 3 – error classification through dwell time, 4 – the impact of the viewing environment and 5 – the effect of prevalence expectation on search. Functional visual field reduced to 2.7° in 3D imaging compared to 5° in 2D radiographs. Although greater visual coverage improved nodule detection, incomplete search was not responsible for missed nodules. Most radiological errors during lung nodule detection were decision‐making errors (30%–45%). Dwell times associated with false‐positive (FP) decisions informed feedback systems to improve diagnosis. Interruptions did not influence diagnostic performance; however, it increased viewing time by 8% and produced a 23.1% search continuation accuracy. Comparative scanning was found to increase the detection of low contrast nodules. Prevalence expectation did not directly affect diagnostic accuracy; however, decision‐making time increased by 2.32 seconds with high prevalence expectations. CONCLUSION: Visual and cognitive factors influence pulmonary nodule detection. Insights gained from eye‐tracking can inform advancements in lung screening. Further exploration of eye‐tracking in lung screening, particularly with low‐dose computed tomography (LDCT), will benefit the future of lung cancer screening. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-02-08 2021-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8168065/ /pubmed/33556995 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.456 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy and New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Articles
Van De Luecht, Monica‐Rose
Reed, Warren Michael
The cognitive and perceptual processes that affect observer performance in lung cancer detection: a scoping review
title The cognitive and perceptual processes that affect observer performance in lung cancer detection: a scoping review
title_full The cognitive and perceptual processes that affect observer performance in lung cancer detection: a scoping review
title_fullStr The cognitive and perceptual processes that affect observer performance in lung cancer detection: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed The cognitive and perceptual processes that affect observer performance in lung cancer detection: a scoping review
title_short The cognitive and perceptual processes that affect observer performance in lung cancer detection: a scoping review
title_sort cognitive and perceptual processes that affect observer performance in lung cancer detection: a scoping review
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8168065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33556995
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.456
work_keys_str_mv AT vandeluechtmonicarose thecognitiveandperceptualprocessesthataffectobserverperformanceinlungcancerdetectionascopingreview
AT reedwarrenmichael thecognitiveandperceptualprocessesthataffectobserverperformanceinlungcancerdetectionascopingreview
AT vandeluechtmonicarose cognitiveandperceptualprocessesthataffectobserverperformanceinlungcancerdetectionascopingreview
AT reedwarrenmichael cognitiveandperceptualprocessesthataffectobserverperformanceinlungcancerdetectionascopingreview