Cargando…
A prospective study monitoring carer distress during (chemo)radiotherapy for head and neck cancer via an electronic platform
INTRODUCTION: Research has shown that electronic platforms can assist data capture of patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs) to guide clinical care. In comparison, routine collection of carer‐reported outcome measures (CROMs) to support the patient–carer dyad during cancer treatment has had limit...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8168069/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33169922 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.448 |
_version_ | 1783701814538928128 |
---|---|
author | Wishart, Laurelie R. Brown, Bena Nund, Rebecca L. Fotinos, Elena Hutchison, Alana R. Ward, Elizabeth C. Porceddu, Sandro V. |
author_facet | Wishart, Laurelie R. Brown, Bena Nund, Rebecca L. Fotinos, Elena Hutchison, Alana R. Ward, Elizabeth C. Porceddu, Sandro V. |
author_sort | Wishart, Laurelie R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Research has shown that electronic platforms can assist data capture of patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs) to guide clinical care. In comparison, routine collection of carer‐reported outcome measures (CROMs) to support the patient–carer dyad during cancer treatment has had limited attention. The current study utilised a novel electronic CROM (eCROM) system, ScreenIT Carer, to monitor the prevalence and nature of distress in carers of patients undergoing (chemo)radiotherapy ((C)RT) for head/neck cancer (HNC), and explore factors associated with carer distress. METHODS: Carers completed ScreenIT Carer weekly when attending patients’ (C)RT treatment sessions from planning to 2 weeks post‐treatment. ScreenIT Carer included the Distress Thermometer (DT) and Problem List, and a purpose‐built Mealtime‐Specific DT and Problem list. Data were first examined descriptively, then associations between demographic/treatment‐related factors and distress severity were analysed using mixed‐effects general linear modelling. RESULTS: 135 carers provided 434 ScreenIT Carer entries during the study period (mean entries = three/carer; yielding average adherence rate of 41% (range 11–100%)). A high prevalence of general (59%) and mealtime‐specific distress (46%) was reported by carers. Nature of distress was multifactorial, with emotional problems and the patients’ physical condition/symptoms common contributing factors. Based on multivariate analysis, tumour site, geographical location of residence and time during (C)RT when ScreenIT Carer was completed were significant predictors of carer distress severity. CONCLUSIONS: Carer distress is prevalent and multifactorial during (C)RT. This study highlights the feasibility of utilising eCROM platforms such as ScreenIT Carer, to monitor carer wellbeing and guide supportive care services as part of a holistic care pathway. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8168069 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81680692021-06-05 A prospective study monitoring carer distress during (chemo)radiotherapy for head and neck cancer via an electronic platform Wishart, Laurelie R. Brown, Bena Nund, Rebecca L. Fotinos, Elena Hutchison, Alana R. Ward, Elizabeth C. Porceddu, Sandro V. J Med Radiat Sci Original Articles INTRODUCTION: Research has shown that electronic platforms can assist data capture of patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs) to guide clinical care. In comparison, routine collection of carer‐reported outcome measures (CROMs) to support the patient–carer dyad during cancer treatment has had limited attention. The current study utilised a novel electronic CROM (eCROM) system, ScreenIT Carer, to monitor the prevalence and nature of distress in carers of patients undergoing (chemo)radiotherapy ((C)RT) for head/neck cancer (HNC), and explore factors associated with carer distress. METHODS: Carers completed ScreenIT Carer weekly when attending patients’ (C)RT treatment sessions from planning to 2 weeks post‐treatment. ScreenIT Carer included the Distress Thermometer (DT) and Problem List, and a purpose‐built Mealtime‐Specific DT and Problem list. Data were first examined descriptively, then associations between demographic/treatment‐related factors and distress severity were analysed using mixed‐effects general linear modelling. RESULTS: 135 carers provided 434 ScreenIT Carer entries during the study period (mean entries = three/carer; yielding average adherence rate of 41% (range 11–100%)). A high prevalence of general (59%) and mealtime‐specific distress (46%) was reported by carers. Nature of distress was multifactorial, with emotional problems and the patients’ physical condition/symptoms common contributing factors. Based on multivariate analysis, tumour site, geographical location of residence and time during (C)RT when ScreenIT Carer was completed were significant predictors of carer distress severity. CONCLUSIONS: Carer distress is prevalent and multifactorial during (C)RT. This study highlights the feasibility of utilising eCROM platforms such as ScreenIT Carer, to monitor carer wellbeing and guide supportive care services as part of a holistic care pathway. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-11-10 2021-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8168069/ /pubmed/33169922 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.448 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy and New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Wishart, Laurelie R. Brown, Bena Nund, Rebecca L. Fotinos, Elena Hutchison, Alana R. Ward, Elizabeth C. Porceddu, Sandro V. A prospective study monitoring carer distress during (chemo)radiotherapy for head and neck cancer via an electronic platform |
title | A prospective study monitoring carer distress during (chemo)radiotherapy for head and neck cancer via an electronic platform |
title_full | A prospective study monitoring carer distress during (chemo)radiotherapy for head and neck cancer via an electronic platform |
title_fullStr | A prospective study monitoring carer distress during (chemo)radiotherapy for head and neck cancer via an electronic platform |
title_full_unstemmed | A prospective study monitoring carer distress during (chemo)radiotherapy for head and neck cancer via an electronic platform |
title_short | A prospective study monitoring carer distress during (chemo)radiotherapy for head and neck cancer via an electronic platform |
title_sort | prospective study monitoring carer distress during (chemo)radiotherapy for head and neck cancer via an electronic platform |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8168069/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33169922 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.448 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wishartlaurelier aprospectivestudymonitoringcarerdistressduringchemoradiotherapyforheadandneckcancerviaanelectronicplatform AT brownbena aprospectivestudymonitoringcarerdistressduringchemoradiotherapyforheadandneckcancerviaanelectronicplatform AT nundrebeccal aprospectivestudymonitoringcarerdistressduringchemoradiotherapyforheadandneckcancerviaanelectronicplatform AT fotinoselena aprospectivestudymonitoringcarerdistressduringchemoradiotherapyforheadandneckcancerviaanelectronicplatform AT hutchisonalanar aprospectivestudymonitoringcarerdistressduringchemoradiotherapyforheadandneckcancerviaanelectronicplatform AT wardelizabethc aprospectivestudymonitoringcarerdistressduringchemoradiotherapyforheadandneckcancerviaanelectronicplatform AT porceddusandrov aprospectivestudymonitoringcarerdistressduringchemoradiotherapyforheadandneckcancerviaanelectronicplatform AT wishartlaurelier prospectivestudymonitoringcarerdistressduringchemoradiotherapyforheadandneckcancerviaanelectronicplatform AT brownbena prospectivestudymonitoringcarerdistressduringchemoradiotherapyforheadandneckcancerviaanelectronicplatform AT nundrebeccal prospectivestudymonitoringcarerdistressduringchemoradiotherapyforheadandneckcancerviaanelectronicplatform AT fotinoselena prospectivestudymonitoringcarerdistressduringchemoradiotherapyforheadandneckcancerviaanelectronicplatform AT hutchisonalanar prospectivestudymonitoringcarerdistressduringchemoradiotherapyforheadandneckcancerviaanelectronicplatform AT wardelizabethc prospectivestudymonitoringcarerdistressduringchemoradiotherapyforheadandneckcancerviaanelectronicplatform AT porceddusandrov prospectivestudymonitoringcarerdistressduringchemoradiotherapyforheadandneckcancerviaanelectronicplatform |