Cargando…
Keep your distance! Measuring staff physical distancing during the Sars-Cov-2 pandemic using a real-time locating system
INTRODUCTION: Staff-to-staff transmission of SARS-CoV-2 poses a significant risk to the Emergency Department (ED) workforce. We measured close (<6 ft), prolonged (>10 min) staff interactions in a busy pediatric Emergency Department in common work areas over time as the pandemic unfolded, measu...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8168304/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34098329 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2021.05.066 |
_version_ | 1783701862353993728 |
---|---|
author | Barrick, Lindsey Overmann, Kevin M. LaBare, Jonathan Wu, Danny T.Y. |
author_facet | Barrick, Lindsey Overmann, Kevin M. LaBare, Jonathan Wu, Danny T.Y. |
author_sort | Barrick, Lindsey |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Staff-to-staff transmission of SARS-CoV-2 poses a significant risk to the Emergency Department (ED) workforce. We measured close (<6 ft), prolonged (>10 min) staff interactions in a busy pediatric Emergency Department in common work areas over time as the pandemic unfolded, measuring the effectiveness of interventions meant to discourage such close contact. METHODS: We used a Real-Time Locating System to measure staff groupings in crowded common work areas lasting ten or more minutes. We compared the number of these interactions pre-pandemic with those occurring early and then later in the pandemic, as distancing interventions were suggested and then formalized. Nearly all healthcare workers in the ED were included, and the duration of interactions over time were evaluated as well. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: This study included a total of 12,386 pairs of staff-to-staff encounters over three time periods including just prior to the pandemic, early in the pandemic response, and later in the steady-state pandemic response. Pairs of staff averaged 0.89 high-risk interactions hourly prior to the pandemic, and this continued early in the pandemic with informal recommendations (0.80 high-risk pairs hourly). High-risk staff encounters fell significantly to 0.47 interactions per hour in the steady-state pandemic with formal distancing guidelines in place and decreased patient and staffing volumes. The duration of these encounters remained stable, near 16 min. Close contact between healthcare staff workers did significantly decrease with formal distancing guidelines, though some high-risk interactions remained, warranting additive protective measures such as universal masking. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8168304 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81683042021-06-01 Keep your distance! Measuring staff physical distancing during the Sars-Cov-2 pandemic using a real-time locating system Barrick, Lindsey Overmann, Kevin M. LaBare, Jonathan Wu, Danny T.Y. Am J Emerg Med Article INTRODUCTION: Staff-to-staff transmission of SARS-CoV-2 poses a significant risk to the Emergency Department (ED) workforce. We measured close (<6 ft), prolonged (>10 min) staff interactions in a busy pediatric Emergency Department in common work areas over time as the pandemic unfolded, measuring the effectiveness of interventions meant to discourage such close contact. METHODS: We used a Real-Time Locating System to measure staff groupings in crowded common work areas lasting ten or more minutes. We compared the number of these interactions pre-pandemic with those occurring early and then later in the pandemic, as distancing interventions were suggested and then formalized. Nearly all healthcare workers in the ED were included, and the duration of interactions over time were evaluated as well. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: This study included a total of 12,386 pairs of staff-to-staff encounters over three time periods including just prior to the pandemic, early in the pandemic response, and later in the steady-state pandemic response. Pairs of staff averaged 0.89 high-risk interactions hourly prior to the pandemic, and this continued early in the pandemic with informal recommendations (0.80 high-risk pairs hourly). High-risk staff encounters fell significantly to 0.47 interactions per hour in the steady-state pandemic with formal distancing guidelines in place and decreased patient and staffing volumes. The duration of these encounters remained stable, near 16 min. Close contact between healthcare staff workers did significantly decrease with formal distancing guidelines, though some high-risk interactions remained, warranting additive protective measures such as universal masking. Elsevier Inc. 2021-11 2021-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8168304/ /pubmed/34098329 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2021.05.066 Text en © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Barrick, Lindsey Overmann, Kevin M. LaBare, Jonathan Wu, Danny T.Y. Keep your distance! Measuring staff physical distancing during the Sars-Cov-2 pandemic using a real-time locating system |
title | Keep your distance! Measuring staff physical distancing during the Sars-Cov-2 pandemic using a real-time locating system |
title_full | Keep your distance! Measuring staff physical distancing during the Sars-Cov-2 pandemic using a real-time locating system |
title_fullStr | Keep your distance! Measuring staff physical distancing during the Sars-Cov-2 pandemic using a real-time locating system |
title_full_unstemmed | Keep your distance! Measuring staff physical distancing during the Sars-Cov-2 pandemic using a real-time locating system |
title_short | Keep your distance! Measuring staff physical distancing during the Sars-Cov-2 pandemic using a real-time locating system |
title_sort | keep your distance! measuring staff physical distancing during the sars-cov-2 pandemic using a real-time locating system |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8168304/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34098329 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2021.05.066 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT barricklindsey keepyourdistancemeasuringstaffphysicaldistancingduringthesarscov2pandemicusingarealtimelocatingsystem AT overmannkevinm keepyourdistancemeasuringstaffphysicaldistancingduringthesarscov2pandemicusingarealtimelocatingsystem AT labarejonathan keepyourdistancemeasuringstaffphysicaldistancingduringthesarscov2pandemicusingarealtimelocatingsystem AT wudannyty keepyourdistancemeasuringstaffphysicaldistancingduringthesarscov2pandemicusingarealtimelocatingsystem |