Cargando…

Risk Scoring Systems Including Electrolyte Disorders for Predicting the Incidence of Acute Kidney Injury in Hospitalized Patients

INTRODUCTION: Electrolyte disorders are common among hospitalized patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) and adversely affect the outcome. This study aimed to explore the potential role of abnormal electrolyte levels on predicting AKI and severe AKI. METHODS: In this retrospective, observational st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Xin, Xu, Jiarui, Li, Yang, Xu, Xialian, Shen, Bo, Zou, Zhouping, Ding, Xiaoqiang, Teng, Jie, Jiang, Wuhua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8168833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34093042
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S311364
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: Electrolyte disorders are common among hospitalized patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) and adversely affect the outcome. This study aimed to explore the potential role of abnormal electrolyte levels on predicting AKI and severe AKI. METHODS: In this retrospective, observational study, we included all hospitalized patients in our hospital in China from October 01, 2014, to September 30, 2015. Since only a few patients had arterial blood gas analysis (ABG), all subjects involved were divided into two groups: patients with ABG and patients without ABG. Severe AKI was defined as AKI stage 2 or 3 according to KDIGO guideline. RESULTS: A total of 80,091 patients were enrolled retrospectively and distributed randomly into the test cohort and the validation cohort (2:1). Logistic regression was performed in the test cohort to analyze risk factors including electrolyte disorders and elucidate the association. The test data (derivation cohort) led to AUC values of 0.758 (95% CI: 0.743–0.773; AKI with ABG), 0.751 (95% CI: 0.740–0.763; AKI without ABG), 0.733 (95% CI: 0.700–0.767; severe AKI with ABG), 0.853 (95% CI: 0.824–0.882; severe AKI without ABG). Application of the scoring system in the validation cohort led to AUC values of 0.724 (95% CI: 0.703–0.744; AKI with ABG), 0.738 (95% CI: 0.721–0.755; AKI without ABG), 0.774 (95% CI: 0.732–0.815; severe AKI with ABG), 0.794 (95% CI: 0.760–0.827; severe AKI without ABG). Hosmer–Lemeshow tests revealed a good calibration. CONCLUSION: The risk scoring systems involving electrolyte disorders were established and validated adequately efficient to predict AKI and severe AKI in hospitalized patients. Electrolyte imbalance needs to be carefully monitored and corrections should be made on time to avoid further adverse outcome.