Cargando…

Comparison of Posterior Unilateral Vertebral Column Resection Versus Posterior Vertebral Column Resection for Severe Thoracolumbar Angular Kyphosis as a Revision Surgical Modality: A Retrospective Cohort Study

The objective of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of posterior unilateral vertebral column resection (PUVCR) as revision surgery for severe thoracolumbar angular kyphosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study. Adult patients undergoing revision surgery for se...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xue, Rui, Liu, Dai, Shen, Yong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8168930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33323700
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001123
_version_ 1783701958304989184
author Xue, Rui
Liu, Dai
Shen, Yong
author_facet Xue, Rui
Liu, Dai
Shen, Yong
author_sort Xue, Rui
collection PubMed
description The objective of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of posterior unilateral vertebral column resection (PUVCR) as revision surgery for severe thoracolumbar angular kyphosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study. Adult patients undergoing revision surgery for severe thoracolumbar angular kyphosis in 2010–2016 with ≥2-year follow-up at our institution were assessed. Perioperative complications and clinical outcomes, including blood loss, operation time, Visual Analog Scale score, Oswestry Disability Index, and preoperative and postoperative kyphotic angles, were analyzed. RESULTS: This study included 58 patients who were divided into the PUVCR group and the posterior vertebral column resection (PVCR) group. Age (P=0.810), sex distribution (P=0.500), and vertebrae that underwent surgery (P=0.638) were similar in the 2 groups. Shorter mean operation time was observed in the PUVCR group as compared with the PVCR group (P<0.001). In addition, less blood loss was recorded in the PUVCR group as compared with the PVCR group (P=0.001). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in a change of Visual Analog Scale scores postoperation versus preoperation (P=0.961), and at postoperative 3 months (P=0.906), 12 months (P=0.752), and 24 months (P=0.811) versus postoperation, respectively. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in Oswestry Disability Index changes postoperation versus preoperation (P=0.157), and at postoperative 3 months (P=0.899), 12 months (P=0.947), and 24 months (P=0.811) versus postoperation, respectively. PUVCR and PVCR were comparable in deformity correction (P=0.434) and final angle correction (P=0.790). Complication rates in the PUVCR and PVCR groups were 7.1% and 36.7%, respectively. CONCLUSION: PUVCR has comparable safety and efficacy to PVCR in treating severe thoracolumbar angular kyphosis, with the advantages of the shorter operation time, less blood loss, and fewer complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8168930
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81689302021-06-09 Comparison of Posterior Unilateral Vertebral Column Resection Versus Posterior Vertebral Column Resection for Severe Thoracolumbar Angular Kyphosis as a Revision Surgical Modality: A Retrospective Cohort Study Xue, Rui Liu, Dai Shen, Yong Clin Spine Surg Primary Research The objective of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of posterior unilateral vertebral column resection (PUVCR) as revision surgery for severe thoracolumbar angular kyphosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study. Adult patients undergoing revision surgery for severe thoracolumbar angular kyphosis in 2010–2016 with ≥2-year follow-up at our institution were assessed. Perioperative complications and clinical outcomes, including blood loss, operation time, Visual Analog Scale score, Oswestry Disability Index, and preoperative and postoperative kyphotic angles, were analyzed. RESULTS: This study included 58 patients who were divided into the PUVCR group and the posterior vertebral column resection (PVCR) group. Age (P=0.810), sex distribution (P=0.500), and vertebrae that underwent surgery (P=0.638) were similar in the 2 groups. Shorter mean operation time was observed in the PUVCR group as compared with the PVCR group (P<0.001). In addition, less blood loss was recorded in the PUVCR group as compared with the PVCR group (P=0.001). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in a change of Visual Analog Scale scores postoperation versus preoperation (P=0.961), and at postoperative 3 months (P=0.906), 12 months (P=0.752), and 24 months (P=0.811) versus postoperation, respectively. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in Oswestry Disability Index changes postoperation versus preoperation (P=0.157), and at postoperative 3 months (P=0.899), 12 months (P=0.947), and 24 months (P=0.811) versus postoperation, respectively. PUVCR and PVCR were comparable in deformity correction (P=0.434) and final angle correction (P=0.790). Complication rates in the PUVCR and PVCR groups were 7.1% and 36.7%, respectively. CONCLUSION: PUVCR has comparable safety and efficacy to PVCR in treating severe thoracolumbar angular kyphosis, with the advantages of the shorter operation time, less blood loss, and fewer complications. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-06 2020-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8168930/ /pubmed/33323700 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001123 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Primary Research
Xue, Rui
Liu, Dai
Shen, Yong
Comparison of Posterior Unilateral Vertebral Column Resection Versus Posterior Vertebral Column Resection for Severe Thoracolumbar Angular Kyphosis as a Revision Surgical Modality: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title Comparison of Posterior Unilateral Vertebral Column Resection Versus Posterior Vertebral Column Resection for Severe Thoracolumbar Angular Kyphosis as a Revision Surgical Modality: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_full Comparison of Posterior Unilateral Vertebral Column Resection Versus Posterior Vertebral Column Resection for Severe Thoracolumbar Angular Kyphosis as a Revision Surgical Modality: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_fullStr Comparison of Posterior Unilateral Vertebral Column Resection Versus Posterior Vertebral Column Resection for Severe Thoracolumbar Angular Kyphosis as a Revision Surgical Modality: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Posterior Unilateral Vertebral Column Resection Versus Posterior Vertebral Column Resection for Severe Thoracolumbar Angular Kyphosis as a Revision Surgical Modality: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_short Comparison of Posterior Unilateral Vertebral Column Resection Versus Posterior Vertebral Column Resection for Severe Thoracolumbar Angular Kyphosis as a Revision Surgical Modality: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_sort comparison of posterior unilateral vertebral column resection versus posterior vertebral column resection for severe thoracolumbar angular kyphosis as a revision surgical modality: a retrospective cohort study
topic Primary Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8168930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33323700
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001123
work_keys_str_mv AT xuerui comparisonofposteriorunilateralvertebralcolumnresectionversusposteriorvertebralcolumnresectionforseverethoracolumbarangularkyphosisasarevisionsurgicalmodalityaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT liudai comparisonofposteriorunilateralvertebralcolumnresectionversusposteriorvertebralcolumnresectionforseverethoracolumbarangularkyphosisasarevisionsurgicalmodalityaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT shenyong comparisonofposteriorunilateralvertebralcolumnresectionversusposteriorvertebralcolumnresectionforseverethoracolumbarangularkyphosisasarevisionsurgicalmodalityaretrospectivecohortstudy