Cargando…

Venous thromboembolism in COVID-19 compared to non-COVID-19 cohorts: A systematic review with meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Many studies confirmed an association between COVID-19 and venous thromboembolism (VTE). Whether the risk of VTE significantly differed between COVID-19 cohorts and non-COVID-19 cohorts with similar disease severity remains unknown. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this systematic review with meta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mai, Vicky, Tan, Boun Kim, Mainbourg, Sabine, Potus, François, Cucherat, Michel, Lega, Jean-Christophe, Provencher, Steeve
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8169236/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34087481
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vph.2021.106882
_version_ 1783702014862032896
author Mai, Vicky
Tan, Boun Kim
Mainbourg, Sabine
Potus, François
Cucherat, Michel
Lega, Jean-Christophe
Provencher, Steeve
author_facet Mai, Vicky
Tan, Boun Kim
Mainbourg, Sabine
Potus, François
Cucherat, Michel
Lega, Jean-Christophe
Provencher, Steeve
author_sort Mai, Vicky
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Many studies confirmed an association between COVID-19 and venous thromboembolism (VTE). Whether the risk of VTE significantly differed between COVID-19 cohorts and non-COVID-19 cohorts with similar disease severity remains unknown. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to compare the rate of VTE between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 cohorts with similar disease severity. METHODS: A systematic literature search (MEDLINE, Embase and Google Scholar) was conducted from January 1, 2020 to March 31, 2021 to identify studies reporting VTE in COVID-19. Relative risks (RR) were estimated for the effect measure with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Seven studies (41,768 patients) evaluated VTE in COVID-19 cohorts compared to non-COVID-19 cohorts. The overall risk of VTE (RR 1.18; 95%CI 0.79–1.77; p = 0.42; I(2) = 54%), pulmonary embolism (RR 1.25; 95%CI 0.77–2.03; p = 0.36; I(2) = 52%) and deep venous thrombosis (RR 0.92; 95%CI 0.52–1.65; p = 0.78; I(2) = 0%) did not significantly differ between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 cohorts. However, subgroup analyses suggested an increased risk of VTE amongst CODID-19 versus non COVID-19 cohorts when only patients hospitalized within the intensive care unit (ICU) were considered (RR 3.10; 95%CI 1.54–6.23), which was not observed in cohorts of predominantly non-ICU patients (RR 0.95; 95%CI 0.81–1.11) (P(interaction) = 0.001). CONCLUSION: There was no signal for a difference in VTE in COVID-19 cohorts compared to non-COVID-19 cohorts, except for the subgroup of patients hospitalized in the ICU. These results should be viewed as exploratory and further studies are needed to confirm these results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8169236
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81692362021-06-02 Venous thromboembolism in COVID-19 compared to non-COVID-19 cohorts: A systematic review with meta-analysis Mai, Vicky Tan, Boun Kim Mainbourg, Sabine Potus, François Cucherat, Michel Lega, Jean-Christophe Provencher, Steeve Vascul Pharmacol Article BACKGROUND: Many studies confirmed an association between COVID-19 and venous thromboembolism (VTE). Whether the risk of VTE significantly differed between COVID-19 cohorts and non-COVID-19 cohorts with similar disease severity remains unknown. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to compare the rate of VTE between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 cohorts with similar disease severity. METHODS: A systematic literature search (MEDLINE, Embase and Google Scholar) was conducted from January 1, 2020 to March 31, 2021 to identify studies reporting VTE in COVID-19. Relative risks (RR) were estimated for the effect measure with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Seven studies (41,768 patients) evaluated VTE in COVID-19 cohorts compared to non-COVID-19 cohorts. The overall risk of VTE (RR 1.18; 95%CI 0.79–1.77; p = 0.42; I(2) = 54%), pulmonary embolism (RR 1.25; 95%CI 0.77–2.03; p = 0.36; I(2) = 52%) and deep venous thrombosis (RR 0.92; 95%CI 0.52–1.65; p = 0.78; I(2) = 0%) did not significantly differ between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 cohorts. However, subgroup analyses suggested an increased risk of VTE amongst CODID-19 versus non COVID-19 cohorts when only patients hospitalized within the intensive care unit (ICU) were considered (RR 3.10; 95%CI 1.54–6.23), which was not observed in cohorts of predominantly non-ICU patients (RR 0.95; 95%CI 0.81–1.11) (P(interaction) = 0.001). CONCLUSION: There was no signal for a difference in VTE in COVID-19 cohorts compared to non-COVID-19 cohorts, except for the subgroup of patients hospitalized in the ICU. These results should be viewed as exploratory and further studies are needed to confirm these results. Elsevier Inc. 2021-08 2021-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8169236/ /pubmed/34087481 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vph.2021.106882 Text en © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Mai, Vicky
Tan, Boun Kim
Mainbourg, Sabine
Potus, François
Cucherat, Michel
Lega, Jean-Christophe
Provencher, Steeve
Venous thromboembolism in COVID-19 compared to non-COVID-19 cohorts: A systematic review with meta-analysis
title Venous thromboembolism in COVID-19 compared to non-COVID-19 cohorts: A systematic review with meta-analysis
title_full Venous thromboembolism in COVID-19 compared to non-COVID-19 cohorts: A systematic review with meta-analysis
title_fullStr Venous thromboembolism in COVID-19 compared to non-COVID-19 cohorts: A systematic review with meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Venous thromboembolism in COVID-19 compared to non-COVID-19 cohorts: A systematic review with meta-analysis
title_short Venous thromboembolism in COVID-19 compared to non-COVID-19 cohorts: A systematic review with meta-analysis
title_sort venous thromboembolism in covid-19 compared to non-covid-19 cohorts: a systematic review with meta-analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8169236/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34087481
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vph.2021.106882
work_keys_str_mv AT maivicky venousthromboembolismincovid19comparedtononcovid19cohortsasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT tanbounkim venousthromboembolismincovid19comparedtononcovid19cohortsasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT mainbourgsabine venousthromboembolismincovid19comparedtononcovid19cohortsasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT potusfrancois venousthromboembolismincovid19comparedtononcovid19cohortsasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT cucheratmichel venousthromboembolismincovid19comparedtononcovid19cohortsasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT legajeanchristophe venousthromboembolismincovid19comparedtononcovid19cohortsasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT provenchersteeve venousthromboembolismincovid19comparedtononcovid19cohortsasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis