Cargando…

Evaluating the usability and safety of the semaglutide single‐dose pen‐injectors through summative (human factors) usability testing

AIMS/INTRODUCTION: A single‐dose, shield‐activated pen‐injector for each of the three approved dose variants (0.25, 0.5 and 1 mg) of once‐weekly subcutaneous semaglutide has been developed to improve usability. This analysis presents findings from the summative usability testing process for the sing...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Klonoff, David C, Bassock, Stephanie, Dwyer, Andrea, Engels, Ella, Qvist, Marianne, Sparre, Thomas, Snitker, Soren
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8169358/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33034163
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdi.13429
_version_ 1783702043515420672
author Klonoff, David C
Bassock, Stephanie
Dwyer, Andrea
Engels, Ella
Qvist, Marianne
Sparre, Thomas
Snitker, Soren
author_facet Klonoff, David C
Bassock, Stephanie
Dwyer, Andrea
Engels, Ella
Qvist, Marianne
Sparre, Thomas
Snitker, Soren
author_sort Klonoff, David C
collection PubMed
description AIMS/INTRODUCTION: A single‐dose, shield‐activated pen‐injector for each of the three approved dose variants (0.25, 0.5 and 1 mg) of once‐weekly subcutaneous semaglutide has been developed to improve usability. This analysis presents findings from the summative usability testing process for the single‐dose semaglutide pen‐injectors, including the pen‐injector four‐pack cartons and instructions for use. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 60 adults representing four user groups were included: patients with/without pen‐injector experience, non‐pharmacist healthcare professionals and pharmacists (each n = 15). Participants carried out four tasks: (i) pen‐injector carton retrieval; (ii) first simulated injection; (iii) pen‐injector retrieval; and (iv) second simulated injection. All participants carried out task 1, and patients and non‐pharmacist healthcare professionals took part in tasks 2–4 (n = 45). The number and types of use errors, close calls and operational difficulties were evaluated, and participants subjectively rated the ease of each task on a scale of 1 (difficult) to 7 (easy). RESULTS: No potentially serious use errors and only one non‐serious use error were reported. Eight participants committed use errors with no potential for harm, one participant committed an unclassified use error, one participant encountered a close call with no potential for harm and one participant experienced an operational difficulty. Mean ease‐of‐use ratings were 6.7 (task 1), 5.9 (task 2), 6.6 (task 3) and 6.9 (task 4). CONCLUSIONS: All three dose variants of the semaglutide single‐dose pen‐injector were considered easy to use (subjective feedback scores near 7) and not associated with any serious use errors, even when participants received no training before study participation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8169358
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81693582021-06-05 Evaluating the usability and safety of the semaglutide single‐dose pen‐injectors through summative (human factors) usability testing Klonoff, David C Bassock, Stephanie Dwyer, Andrea Engels, Ella Qvist, Marianne Sparre, Thomas Snitker, Soren J Diabetes Investig Articles AIMS/INTRODUCTION: A single‐dose, shield‐activated pen‐injector for each of the three approved dose variants (0.25, 0.5 and 1 mg) of once‐weekly subcutaneous semaglutide has been developed to improve usability. This analysis presents findings from the summative usability testing process for the single‐dose semaglutide pen‐injectors, including the pen‐injector four‐pack cartons and instructions for use. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 60 adults representing four user groups were included: patients with/without pen‐injector experience, non‐pharmacist healthcare professionals and pharmacists (each n = 15). Participants carried out four tasks: (i) pen‐injector carton retrieval; (ii) first simulated injection; (iii) pen‐injector retrieval; and (iv) second simulated injection. All participants carried out task 1, and patients and non‐pharmacist healthcare professionals took part in tasks 2–4 (n = 45). The number and types of use errors, close calls and operational difficulties were evaluated, and participants subjectively rated the ease of each task on a scale of 1 (difficult) to 7 (easy). RESULTS: No potentially serious use errors and only one non‐serious use error were reported. Eight participants committed use errors with no potential for harm, one participant committed an unclassified use error, one participant encountered a close call with no potential for harm and one participant experienced an operational difficulty. Mean ease‐of‐use ratings were 6.7 (task 1), 5.9 (task 2), 6.6 (task 3) and 6.9 (task 4). CONCLUSIONS: All three dose variants of the semaglutide single‐dose pen‐injector were considered easy to use (subjective feedback scores near 7) and not associated with any serious use errors, even when participants received no training before study participation. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-11-18 2021-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8169358/ /pubmed/33034163 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdi.13429 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Diabetes Investigation published by Asian Association for the Study of Diabetes (AASD) and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Articles
Klonoff, David C
Bassock, Stephanie
Dwyer, Andrea
Engels, Ella
Qvist, Marianne
Sparre, Thomas
Snitker, Soren
Evaluating the usability and safety of the semaglutide single‐dose pen‐injectors through summative (human factors) usability testing
title Evaluating the usability and safety of the semaglutide single‐dose pen‐injectors through summative (human factors) usability testing
title_full Evaluating the usability and safety of the semaglutide single‐dose pen‐injectors through summative (human factors) usability testing
title_fullStr Evaluating the usability and safety of the semaglutide single‐dose pen‐injectors through summative (human factors) usability testing
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the usability and safety of the semaglutide single‐dose pen‐injectors through summative (human factors) usability testing
title_short Evaluating the usability and safety of the semaglutide single‐dose pen‐injectors through summative (human factors) usability testing
title_sort evaluating the usability and safety of the semaglutide single‐dose pen‐injectors through summative (human factors) usability testing
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8169358/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33034163
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdi.13429
work_keys_str_mv AT klonoffdavidc evaluatingtheusabilityandsafetyofthesemaglutidesingledosepeninjectorsthroughsummativehumanfactorsusabilitytesting
AT bassockstephanie evaluatingtheusabilityandsafetyofthesemaglutidesingledosepeninjectorsthroughsummativehumanfactorsusabilitytesting
AT dwyerandrea evaluatingtheusabilityandsafetyofthesemaglutidesingledosepeninjectorsthroughsummativehumanfactorsusabilitytesting
AT engelsella evaluatingtheusabilityandsafetyofthesemaglutidesingledosepeninjectorsthroughsummativehumanfactorsusabilitytesting
AT qvistmarianne evaluatingtheusabilityandsafetyofthesemaglutidesingledosepeninjectorsthroughsummativehumanfactorsusabilitytesting
AT sparrethomas evaluatingtheusabilityandsafetyofthesemaglutidesingledosepeninjectorsthroughsummativehumanfactorsusabilitytesting
AT snitkersoren evaluatingtheusabilityandsafetyofthesemaglutidesingledosepeninjectorsthroughsummativehumanfactorsusabilitytesting