Cargando…

Assessment of immediate and non-immediate hypersensitivity contrast reactions by skin tests and provocation tests: A review

INTRODUCTION: Allergic and nonallergic hypersensitivity reactions to iodinated contrast media (ICM) and gadolinium-based contrast media are classified as immediate or non-immediate hypersensitivity reactions (IHR and NIHR), respectively. Skin tests and provocation tests are recommended for the evalu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bansie, Rakesh D, Karim, A Faiz, van Maaren, Maurits S, Hermans, Maud AW, van Daele, Paul LA, Gerth van Wijk, Roy, Rombach, Saskia M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8170298/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34053316
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20587384211015061
_version_ 1783702211940843520
author Bansie, Rakesh D
Karim, A Faiz
van Maaren, Maurits S
Hermans, Maud AW
van Daele, Paul LA
Gerth van Wijk, Roy
Rombach, Saskia M
author_facet Bansie, Rakesh D
Karim, A Faiz
van Maaren, Maurits S
Hermans, Maud AW
van Daele, Paul LA
Gerth van Wijk, Roy
Rombach, Saskia M
author_sort Bansie, Rakesh D
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Allergic and nonallergic hypersensitivity reactions to iodinated contrast media (ICM) and gadolinium-based contrast media are classified as immediate or non-immediate hypersensitivity reactions (IHR and NIHR), respectively. Skin tests and provocation tests are recommended for the evaluation of hypersensitivity reactions to contrast agents; however provocations are not common in clinical practice. METHODS: A MEDLINE search was conducted to investigate studies comprising both skin tests and provocation tests that evaluated hypersensitivity reactions to ICM. RESULTS: Nineteen studies were identified that reported on skin tests, followed by provocations. In the case of IHR to ICM, 65/69 (94%) patients with a positive skin test for the culprit media tolerated a challenge with a skin-test-negative alternative ICM. In IHR to ICM with a negative skin test for the culprit media, provocations were positive in 3.2%–9.1% patients. In the case of a NIHR to ICM with a positive skin test, provocation with a skin-test-negative agent was tolerated in 75/105 (71%) of cases. In NIHR with a negative skin test for the culprit agent, re-exposure to the culprit or an alternative was positive in 0%–34.6% patients. Provocations with the same ICM in skin test positive patients with IHR or NIHR were positive for a majority of the patients, although such provocation tests were rarely performed. Data on hypersensitivity reactions, skin tests and provocations with gadolinium-based contrast media were limited; however, they exhibited a pattern similar to that observed in ICM. CONCLUSION: In both ICM and gadolinium-based contrast media, the risk of an immediate repeat reaction is low when skin tests are negative. In contrast, a provocation with a skin-test-positive contrast medium showed a high risk of an immediate repeat hypersensitivity reaction. Therefore, a thorough medical history is necessary, followed by skin tests. A provocation is recommended, for diagnostic work-up, when the diagnosis is uncertain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8170298
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81702982021-06-07 Assessment of immediate and non-immediate hypersensitivity contrast reactions by skin tests and provocation tests: A review Bansie, Rakesh D Karim, A Faiz van Maaren, Maurits S Hermans, Maud AW van Daele, Paul LA Gerth van Wijk, Roy Rombach, Saskia M Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol Original Research Article INTRODUCTION: Allergic and nonallergic hypersensitivity reactions to iodinated contrast media (ICM) and gadolinium-based contrast media are classified as immediate or non-immediate hypersensitivity reactions (IHR and NIHR), respectively. Skin tests and provocation tests are recommended for the evaluation of hypersensitivity reactions to contrast agents; however provocations are not common in clinical practice. METHODS: A MEDLINE search was conducted to investigate studies comprising both skin tests and provocation tests that evaluated hypersensitivity reactions to ICM. RESULTS: Nineteen studies were identified that reported on skin tests, followed by provocations. In the case of IHR to ICM, 65/69 (94%) patients with a positive skin test for the culprit media tolerated a challenge with a skin-test-negative alternative ICM. In IHR to ICM with a negative skin test for the culprit media, provocations were positive in 3.2%–9.1% patients. In the case of a NIHR to ICM with a positive skin test, provocation with a skin-test-negative agent was tolerated in 75/105 (71%) of cases. In NIHR with a negative skin test for the culprit agent, re-exposure to the culprit or an alternative was positive in 0%–34.6% patients. Provocations with the same ICM in skin test positive patients with IHR or NIHR were positive for a majority of the patients, although such provocation tests were rarely performed. Data on hypersensitivity reactions, skin tests and provocations with gadolinium-based contrast media were limited; however, they exhibited a pattern similar to that observed in ICM. CONCLUSION: In both ICM and gadolinium-based contrast media, the risk of an immediate repeat reaction is low when skin tests are negative. In contrast, a provocation with a skin-test-positive contrast medium showed a high risk of an immediate repeat hypersensitivity reaction. Therefore, a thorough medical history is necessary, followed by skin tests. A provocation is recommended, for diagnostic work-up, when the diagnosis is uncertain. SAGE Publications 2021-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8170298/ /pubmed/34053316 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20587384211015061 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Bansie, Rakesh D
Karim, A Faiz
van Maaren, Maurits S
Hermans, Maud AW
van Daele, Paul LA
Gerth van Wijk, Roy
Rombach, Saskia M
Assessment of immediate and non-immediate hypersensitivity contrast reactions by skin tests and provocation tests: A review
title Assessment of immediate and non-immediate hypersensitivity contrast reactions by skin tests and provocation tests: A review
title_full Assessment of immediate and non-immediate hypersensitivity contrast reactions by skin tests and provocation tests: A review
title_fullStr Assessment of immediate and non-immediate hypersensitivity contrast reactions by skin tests and provocation tests: A review
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of immediate and non-immediate hypersensitivity contrast reactions by skin tests and provocation tests: A review
title_short Assessment of immediate and non-immediate hypersensitivity contrast reactions by skin tests and provocation tests: A review
title_sort assessment of immediate and non-immediate hypersensitivity contrast reactions by skin tests and provocation tests: a review
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8170298/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34053316
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20587384211015061
work_keys_str_mv AT bansierakeshd assessmentofimmediateandnonimmediatehypersensitivitycontrastreactionsbyskintestsandprovocationtestsareview
AT karimafaiz assessmentofimmediateandnonimmediatehypersensitivitycontrastreactionsbyskintestsandprovocationtestsareview
AT vanmaarenmauritss assessmentofimmediateandnonimmediatehypersensitivitycontrastreactionsbyskintestsandprovocationtestsareview
AT hermansmaudaw assessmentofimmediateandnonimmediatehypersensitivitycontrastreactionsbyskintestsandprovocationtestsareview
AT vandaelepaulla assessmentofimmediateandnonimmediatehypersensitivitycontrastreactionsbyskintestsandprovocationtestsareview
AT gerthvanwijkroy assessmentofimmediateandnonimmediatehypersensitivitycontrastreactionsbyskintestsandprovocationtestsareview
AT rombachsaskiam assessmentofimmediateandnonimmediatehypersensitivitycontrastreactionsbyskintestsandprovocationtestsareview