Cargando…
Pulse-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy in anal squamous cell carcinoma: clinical outcomes and patients’ health quality perception
PURPOSE: To examine clinical outcomes and quality of life of patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma treated with interstitial pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy (PDR-BT) with a boost to residual tumor after external radiotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Medical records of patients receiving a brachyth...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Termedia Publishing House
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8170522/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34122565 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2021.106247 |
_version_ | 1783702262928900096 |
---|---|
author | Bourdais, Rémi Achkar, Samir Espenel, Sophie Bockel, Sophie Chauffert-Yvart, Laetitia de Mellis, Florence Ravet Ta, Minh-Hanh Boukhelif, Wassila Durand-Labrunie, Jérôme Burtin, Pascal Haie-Meder, Christine Deutsch, Eric Chargari, Cyrus |
author_facet | Bourdais, Rémi Achkar, Samir Espenel, Sophie Bockel, Sophie Chauffert-Yvart, Laetitia de Mellis, Florence Ravet Ta, Minh-Hanh Boukhelif, Wassila Durand-Labrunie, Jérôme Burtin, Pascal Haie-Meder, Christine Deutsch, Eric Chargari, Cyrus |
author_sort | Bourdais, Rémi |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To examine clinical outcomes and quality of life of patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma treated with interstitial pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy (PDR-BT) with a boost to residual tumor after external radiotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Medical records of patients receiving a brachytherapy boost after radiotherapy for anal squamous cell carcinoma in our Institute between 2008 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. After receiving pelvic irradiation ± concurrent chemotherapy, patients received PDR-BT boost to residual tumor, in order to deliver a minimal total dose of 60 Gy. Patients’ outcomes were analyzed, with primary focus on local control, sphincter preservation, morbidity, and quality of life. RESULTS: A total of 42 patients were identified, included 24, 13, and 5 patients with I, II, and III tumor stages, respectively. Median brachytherapy (BT) dose was 20 Gy (range, 10-30 Gy). Median dose per pulse was 42 cGy (range, 37.5-50 cGy). With median follow-up of 60.4 months (range, 5.4-127.4 months), estimated local control and colostomy-free survival rates at 5 years were both 88.7% (95% CI: 67.4-96.4%). The largest axis of residual lesion after external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and poor tumor shrinkage were associated with more frequent relapses (p = 0.02 and p = 0.007, respectively). Out of 40 patients with more than 6 months follow-up, only one experienced severe delayed toxicity (fecal incontinence). Health quality perception was very good or good in 20 of 22 (91%) patients, according to their replies of quality-of-life surveys. A total dose ≥ 63 Gy was associated with higher number of anorectal grade 1+ toxicities (n = 1.5 vs. n = 0.61, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of 42 patients with mainly I and II tumor stages, PDR-BT boost allowed for local control in 88.7% of patients, with only one grade 3 anorectal toxicity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8170522 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Termedia Publishing House |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81705222021-06-11 Pulse-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy in anal squamous cell carcinoma: clinical outcomes and patients’ health quality perception Bourdais, Rémi Achkar, Samir Espenel, Sophie Bockel, Sophie Chauffert-Yvart, Laetitia de Mellis, Florence Ravet Ta, Minh-Hanh Boukhelif, Wassila Durand-Labrunie, Jérôme Burtin, Pascal Haie-Meder, Christine Deutsch, Eric Chargari, Cyrus J Contemp Brachytherapy Original Paper PURPOSE: To examine clinical outcomes and quality of life of patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma treated with interstitial pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy (PDR-BT) with a boost to residual tumor after external radiotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Medical records of patients receiving a brachytherapy boost after radiotherapy for anal squamous cell carcinoma in our Institute between 2008 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. After receiving pelvic irradiation ± concurrent chemotherapy, patients received PDR-BT boost to residual tumor, in order to deliver a minimal total dose of 60 Gy. Patients’ outcomes were analyzed, with primary focus on local control, sphincter preservation, morbidity, and quality of life. RESULTS: A total of 42 patients were identified, included 24, 13, and 5 patients with I, II, and III tumor stages, respectively. Median brachytherapy (BT) dose was 20 Gy (range, 10-30 Gy). Median dose per pulse was 42 cGy (range, 37.5-50 cGy). With median follow-up of 60.4 months (range, 5.4-127.4 months), estimated local control and colostomy-free survival rates at 5 years were both 88.7% (95% CI: 67.4-96.4%). The largest axis of residual lesion after external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and poor tumor shrinkage were associated with more frequent relapses (p = 0.02 and p = 0.007, respectively). Out of 40 patients with more than 6 months follow-up, only one experienced severe delayed toxicity (fecal incontinence). Health quality perception was very good or good in 20 of 22 (91%) patients, according to their replies of quality-of-life surveys. A total dose ≥ 63 Gy was associated with higher number of anorectal grade 1+ toxicities (n = 1.5 vs. n = 0.61, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of 42 patients with mainly I and II tumor stages, PDR-BT boost allowed for local control in 88.7% of patients, with only one grade 3 anorectal toxicity. Termedia Publishing House 2021-05-18 2021-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8170522/ /pubmed/34122565 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2021.106247 Text en Copyright © 2021 Termedia https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) ) |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Bourdais, Rémi Achkar, Samir Espenel, Sophie Bockel, Sophie Chauffert-Yvart, Laetitia de Mellis, Florence Ravet Ta, Minh-Hanh Boukhelif, Wassila Durand-Labrunie, Jérôme Burtin, Pascal Haie-Meder, Christine Deutsch, Eric Chargari, Cyrus Pulse-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy in anal squamous cell carcinoma: clinical outcomes and patients’ health quality perception |
title | Pulse-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy in anal squamous cell carcinoma: clinical outcomes and patients’ health quality perception |
title_full | Pulse-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy in anal squamous cell carcinoma: clinical outcomes and patients’ health quality perception |
title_fullStr | Pulse-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy in anal squamous cell carcinoma: clinical outcomes and patients’ health quality perception |
title_full_unstemmed | Pulse-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy in anal squamous cell carcinoma: clinical outcomes and patients’ health quality perception |
title_short | Pulse-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy in anal squamous cell carcinoma: clinical outcomes and patients’ health quality perception |
title_sort | pulse-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy in anal squamous cell carcinoma: clinical outcomes and patients’ health quality perception |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8170522/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34122565 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2021.106247 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bourdaisremi pulsedoserateinterstitialbrachytherapyinanalsquamouscellcarcinomaclinicaloutcomesandpatientshealthqualityperception AT achkarsamir pulsedoserateinterstitialbrachytherapyinanalsquamouscellcarcinomaclinicaloutcomesandpatientshealthqualityperception AT espenelsophie pulsedoserateinterstitialbrachytherapyinanalsquamouscellcarcinomaclinicaloutcomesandpatientshealthqualityperception AT bockelsophie pulsedoserateinterstitialbrachytherapyinanalsquamouscellcarcinomaclinicaloutcomesandpatientshealthqualityperception AT chauffertyvartlaetitia pulsedoserateinterstitialbrachytherapyinanalsquamouscellcarcinomaclinicaloutcomesandpatientshealthqualityperception AT demellisflorenceravet pulsedoserateinterstitialbrachytherapyinanalsquamouscellcarcinomaclinicaloutcomesandpatientshealthqualityperception AT taminhhanh pulsedoserateinterstitialbrachytherapyinanalsquamouscellcarcinomaclinicaloutcomesandpatientshealthqualityperception AT boukhelifwassila pulsedoserateinterstitialbrachytherapyinanalsquamouscellcarcinomaclinicaloutcomesandpatientshealthqualityperception AT durandlabruniejerome pulsedoserateinterstitialbrachytherapyinanalsquamouscellcarcinomaclinicaloutcomesandpatientshealthqualityperception AT burtinpascal pulsedoserateinterstitialbrachytherapyinanalsquamouscellcarcinomaclinicaloutcomesandpatientshealthqualityperception AT haiemederchristine pulsedoserateinterstitialbrachytherapyinanalsquamouscellcarcinomaclinicaloutcomesandpatientshealthqualityperception AT deutscheric pulsedoserateinterstitialbrachytherapyinanalsquamouscellcarcinomaclinicaloutcomesandpatientshealthqualityperception AT chargaricyrus pulsedoserateinterstitialbrachytherapyinanalsquamouscellcarcinomaclinicaloutcomesandpatientshealthqualityperception |