Cargando…

Continuous research monitoring improves the quality of research conduct and compliance among research trainees: internal evaluation of a monitoring programme

Background: Research site monitoring (RSM) is an effective way to ensure compliance with Good Clinical Practice (GCP). However, RSM is not offered to trainees (investigators) at African Institutions routinely. The Makerere University/Uganda Virus Research Institute Centre of Excellence in Infection...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Akello, Mirriam, Coutinho, Sarah, N-Mboowa, Mary Gorrethy, Bukirwa, Victoria D, Natukunda, Agnes, Lubyayi, Lawrence, Nabakooza, Grace, Cose, Stephen, Elliott, Alison M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000 Research Limited 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8170533/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34124576
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/aasopenres.13117.1
_version_ 1783702265350062080
author Akello, Mirriam
Coutinho, Sarah
N-Mboowa, Mary Gorrethy
Bukirwa, Victoria D
Natukunda, Agnes
Lubyayi, Lawrence
Nabakooza, Grace
Cose, Stephen
Elliott, Alison M.
author_facet Akello, Mirriam
Coutinho, Sarah
N-Mboowa, Mary Gorrethy
Bukirwa, Victoria D
Natukunda, Agnes
Lubyayi, Lawrence
Nabakooza, Grace
Cose, Stephen
Elliott, Alison M.
author_sort Akello, Mirriam
collection PubMed
description Background: Research site monitoring (RSM) is an effective way to ensure compliance with Good Clinical Practice (GCP). However, RSM is not offered to trainees (investigators) at African Institutions routinely. The Makerere University/Uganda Virus Research Institute Centre of Excellence in Infection and Immunity Research and Training (MUII-Plus) introduced internal monitoring to promote the quality of trainees’ research projects. Here, we share our monitoring model, experiences and achievements, and challenges encountered. Methods: We analysed investigators’ project reports from monitoring visits undertaken from April 2017 to December 2019. Monitors followed a standard checklist to review investigator site files and record forms, and toured site facilities. We planned four monitoring visits for each trainee: one at site initiation, two interim, and a closeout monitoring visit. A team of two monitors conducted the visits. Results: We monitored 25 out of the 26 research projects in progress between April 2017 and December 2019. Compliance with protocols, standard operating procedures, GCP, and GCLP improved with each monitoring visit. Median (IQR) compliance rate was 43% (31%, 44%) at site initiation visit for different monitoring items, 70% (54%, 90%) at the 1st interim monitoring visit, 100% (92%, 100%) at 2nd interim monitoring visit and all projects achieved 100% compliance at site closeout.  All investigators had good work ethics and practice, and appropriate facilities. Initially, some investigators’ files lacked essential documents, and informed consent processes needed to be improved. We realized that non-compliant investigators had not received prior training in GCP/GCLP, so we offered them this training. Conclusions: Routine monitoring helps identify non-compliance early and improves the quality of research. We recommend continuous internal monitoring for all research studies. Investigators conducting research involving human subjects should receive GCP/GCLP training before commencing their projects. Institutional higher degrees and research ethics committees should enforce this as a requirement for project approvals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8170533
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher F1000 Research Limited
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81705332021-06-11 Continuous research monitoring improves the quality of research conduct and compliance among research trainees: internal evaluation of a monitoring programme Akello, Mirriam Coutinho, Sarah N-Mboowa, Mary Gorrethy Bukirwa, Victoria D Natukunda, Agnes Lubyayi, Lawrence Nabakooza, Grace Cose, Stephen Elliott, Alison M. AAS Open Res Research Article Background: Research site monitoring (RSM) is an effective way to ensure compliance with Good Clinical Practice (GCP). However, RSM is not offered to trainees (investigators) at African Institutions routinely. The Makerere University/Uganda Virus Research Institute Centre of Excellence in Infection and Immunity Research and Training (MUII-Plus) introduced internal monitoring to promote the quality of trainees’ research projects. Here, we share our monitoring model, experiences and achievements, and challenges encountered. Methods: We analysed investigators’ project reports from monitoring visits undertaken from April 2017 to December 2019. Monitors followed a standard checklist to review investigator site files and record forms, and toured site facilities. We planned four monitoring visits for each trainee: one at site initiation, two interim, and a closeout monitoring visit. A team of two monitors conducted the visits. Results: We monitored 25 out of the 26 research projects in progress between April 2017 and December 2019. Compliance with protocols, standard operating procedures, GCP, and GCLP improved with each monitoring visit. Median (IQR) compliance rate was 43% (31%, 44%) at site initiation visit for different monitoring items, 70% (54%, 90%) at the 1st interim monitoring visit, 100% (92%, 100%) at 2nd interim monitoring visit and all projects achieved 100% compliance at site closeout.  All investigators had good work ethics and practice, and appropriate facilities. Initially, some investigators’ files lacked essential documents, and informed consent processes needed to be improved. We realized that non-compliant investigators had not received prior training in GCP/GCLP, so we offered them this training. Conclusions: Routine monitoring helps identify non-compliance early and improves the quality of research. We recommend continuous internal monitoring for all research studies. Investigators conducting research involving human subjects should receive GCP/GCLP training before commencing their projects. Institutional higher degrees and research ethics committees should enforce this as a requirement for project approvals. F1000 Research Limited 2020-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8170533/ /pubmed/34124576 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/aasopenres.13117.1 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Akello M et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Akello, Mirriam
Coutinho, Sarah
N-Mboowa, Mary Gorrethy
Bukirwa, Victoria D
Natukunda, Agnes
Lubyayi, Lawrence
Nabakooza, Grace
Cose, Stephen
Elliott, Alison M.
Continuous research monitoring improves the quality of research conduct and compliance among research trainees: internal evaluation of a monitoring programme
title Continuous research monitoring improves the quality of research conduct and compliance among research trainees: internal evaluation of a monitoring programme
title_full Continuous research monitoring improves the quality of research conduct and compliance among research trainees: internal evaluation of a monitoring programme
title_fullStr Continuous research monitoring improves the quality of research conduct and compliance among research trainees: internal evaluation of a monitoring programme
title_full_unstemmed Continuous research monitoring improves the quality of research conduct and compliance among research trainees: internal evaluation of a monitoring programme
title_short Continuous research monitoring improves the quality of research conduct and compliance among research trainees: internal evaluation of a monitoring programme
title_sort continuous research monitoring improves the quality of research conduct and compliance among research trainees: internal evaluation of a monitoring programme
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8170533/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34124576
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/aasopenres.13117.1
work_keys_str_mv AT akellomirriam continuousresearchmonitoringimprovesthequalityofresearchconductandcomplianceamongresearchtraineesinternalevaluationofamonitoringprogramme
AT coutinhosarah continuousresearchmonitoringimprovesthequalityofresearchconductandcomplianceamongresearchtraineesinternalevaluationofamonitoringprogramme
AT nmboowamarygorrethy continuousresearchmonitoringimprovesthequalityofresearchconductandcomplianceamongresearchtraineesinternalevaluationofamonitoringprogramme
AT bukirwavictoriad continuousresearchmonitoringimprovesthequalityofresearchconductandcomplianceamongresearchtraineesinternalevaluationofamonitoringprogramme
AT natukundaagnes continuousresearchmonitoringimprovesthequalityofresearchconductandcomplianceamongresearchtraineesinternalevaluationofamonitoringprogramme
AT lubyayilawrence continuousresearchmonitoringimprovesthequalityofresearchconductandcomplianceamongresearchtraineesinternalevaluationofamonitoringprogramme
AT nabakoozagrace continuousresearchmonitoringimprovesthequalityofresearchconductandcomplianceamongresearchtraineesinternalevaluationofamonitoringprogramme
AT cosestephen continuousresearchmonitoringimprovesthequalityofresearchconductandcomplianceamongresearchtraineesinternalevaluationofamonitoringprogramme
AT elliottalisonm continuousresearchmonitoringimprovesthequalityofresearchconductandcomplianceamongresearchtraineesinternalevaluationofamonitoringprogramme