Cargando…
Development of the Gambling Disorder Identification Test: Results from an international Delphi and consensus process
OBJECTIVES: Diverse instruments are used to measure problem gambling and Gambling Disorder intervention outcomes. The 2004 Banff consensus agreement proposed necessary features for reporting gambling treatment efficacy. To address the challenge of including these features in a single instrument, a p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8170582/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33220163 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1865 |
_version_ | 1783702273967259648 |
---|---|
author | Molander, Olof Volberg, Rachel Månsson, Viktor Sundqvist, Kristina Wennberg, Peter Berman, Anne H. |
author_facet | Molander, Olof Volberg, Rachel Månsson, Viktor Sundqvist, Kristina Wennberg, Peter Berman, Anne H. |
author_sort | Molander, Olof |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Diverse instruments are used to measure problem gambling and Gambling Disorder intervention outcomes. The 2004 Banff consensus agreement proposed necessary features for reporting gambling treatment efficacy. To address the challenge of including these features in a single instrument, a process was initiated to develop the Gambling Disorder Identification Test (GDIT), as an instrument analogous to the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test and the Drug Use Disorders Identification Test. METHODS: Gambling experts from 10 countries participated in an international two‐round Delphi (n = 61; n = 30), rating 30 items proposed for inclusion in the GDIT. Gambling researchers and clinicians from several countries participated in three consensus meetings (n = 10; n = 4; n = 3). User feedback was obtained from individuals with experience of problem gambling (n = 12) and from treatment‐seekers with Gambling Disorder (n = 8). RESULTS: Ten items fulfilled Delphi consensus criteria for inclusion in the GDIT (M ≥ 7 on a scale of 1–9 in the second round). Item‐related issues were addressed, and four more items were added to conform to the Banff agreement recommendations, yielding a final draft version of the GDIT with 14 items in three domains: gambling behavior, gambling symptoms and negative consequences. CONCLUSIONS: This study established preliminary construct and face validity for the GDIT. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8170582 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81705822021-06-11 Development of the Gambling Disorder Identification Test: Results from an international Delphi and consensus process Molander, Olof Volberg, Rachel Månsson, Viktor Sundqvist, Kristina Wennberg, Peter Berman, Anne H. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res Original Article OBJECTIVES: Diverse instruments are used to measure problem gambling and Gambling Disorder intervention outcomes. The 2004 Banff consensus agreement proposed necessary features for reporting gambling treatment efficacy. To address the challenge of including these features in a single instrument, a process was initiated to develop the Gambling Disorder Identification Test (GDIT), as an instrument analogous to the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test and the Drug Use Disorders Identification Test. METHODS: Gambling experts from 10 countries participated in an international two‐round Delphi (n = 61; n = 30), rating 30 items proposed for inclusion in the GDIT. Gambling researchers and clinicians from several countries participated in three consensus meetings (n = 10; n = 4; n = 3). User feedback was obtained from individuals with experience of problem gambling (n = 12) and from treatment‐seekers with Gambling Disorder (n = 8). RESULTS: Ten items fulfilled Delphi consensus criteria for inclusion in the GDIT (M ≥ 7 on a scale of 1–9 in the second round). Item‐related issues were addressed, and four more items were added to conform to the Banff agreement recommendations, yielding a final draft version of the GDIT with 14 items in three domains: gambling behavior, gambling symptoms and negative consequences. CONCLUSIONS: This study established preliminary construct and face validity for the GDIT. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8170582/ /pubmed/33220163 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1865 Text en © 2020 The Authors. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Molander, Olof Volberg, Rachel Månsson, Viktor Sundqvist, Kristina Wennberg, Peter Berman, Anne H. Development of the Gambling Disorder Identification Test: Results from an international Delphi and consensus process |
title | Development of the Gambling Disorder Identification Test: Results from an international Delphi and consensus process |
title_full | Development of the Gambling Disorder Identification Test: Results from an international Delphi and consensus process |
title_fullStr | Development of the Gambling Disorder Identification Test: Results from an international Delphi and consensus process |
title_full_unstemmed | Development of the Gambling Disorder Identification Test: Results from an international Delphi and consensus process |
title_short | Development of the Gambling Disorder Identification Test: Results from an international Delphi and consensus process |
title_sort | development of the gambling disorder identification test: results from an international delphi and consensus process |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8170582/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33220163 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1865 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT molanderolof developmentofthegamblingdisorderidentificationtestresultsfromaninternationaldelphiandconsensusprocess AT volbergrachel developmentofthegamblingdisorderidentificationtestresultsfromaninternationaldelphiandconsensusprocess AT manssonviktor developmentofthegamblingdisorderidentificationtestresultsfromaninternationaldelphiandconsensusprocess AT sundqvistkristina developmentofthegamblingdisorderidentificationtestresultsfromaninternationaldelphiandconsensusprocess AT wennbergpeter developmentofthegamblingdisorderidentificationtestresultsfromaninternationaldelphiandconsensusprocess AT bermananneh developmentofthegamblingdisorderidentificationtestresultsfromaninternationaldelphiandconsensusprocess |