Cargando…

Alternative approaches to managing respiratory tract infections: a survey of public perceptions

BACKGROUND: Respiratory tract infections (RTIs) are a common reason for people to consult in primary care, and contribute to antibiotic overuse and antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Alternative approaches to supporting patients with RTIs may help, but it is important to understand public perceptions a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moore, Alex, Cannings-John, Rebecca, Butler, Christopher C, McNulty, Cliodna AM, Francis, Nick A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Royal College of General Practitioners 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8170598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33293410
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2020.0124
_version_ 1783702276360110080
author Moore, Alex
Cannings-John, Rebecca
Butler, Christopher C
McNulty, Cliodna AM
Francis, Nick A
author_facet Moore, Alex
Cannings-John, Rebecca
Butler, Christopher C
McNulty, Cliodna AM
Francis, Nick A
author_sort Moore, Alex
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Respiratory tract infections (RTIs) are a common reason for people to consult in primary care, and contribute to antibiotic overuse and antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Alternative approaches to supporting patients with RTIs may help, but it is important to understand public perceptions about these approaches before they are widely implemented. AIM: To describe public perceptions regarding finger-prick testing, back-up antibiotic prescriptions (BUPs), and alternatives to traditional consultations for RTIs, and identify factors associated with favouring these approaches. DESIGN & SETTING: Online national survey (HealthWise Wales) with linked primary care health record data. METHOD: Survey item response distributions were described. Associations between responses about consultation alternatives, BUP, and finger-prick point-of-care testing (POCT), and potential explanatory variables, were explored using logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 8752 participants completed the survey between 2016 and 2018. The survey found 76.7% (n = 3807/4,966) and 71.2% (n = 3529/4,953) of responders with valid responses were in favour of being able to consult with a pharmacist or nurse in their GP surgery, or with a community pharmacist, respectively. It also showed 92.8% (n = 8034/8659) of responders indicated they would be happy to have a finger-prick test to guide antibiotic prescribing, and 31.8% (n = 2746/8646) indicated they would like to be given a BUP if their clinician thought immediate antibiotics were not required. In addition, 47.4% (n = 2342/4944) and 42.3% (n = 2095/4949) were in favour of having video and email consultations, respectively. Characteristics associated with different response options were identified. CONCLUSION: Consulting with pharmacists, using electronic communication tools, and finger-prick testing are widely acceptable approaches. BUP was described as acceptable less often, and is likely to require greater information and support when used.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8170598
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Royal College of General Practitioners
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81705982021-06-11 Alternative approaches to managing respiratory tract infections: a survey of public perceptions Moore, Alex Cannings-John, Rebecca Butler, Christopher C McNulty, Cliodna AM Francis, Nick A BJGP Open Research BACKGROUND: Respiratory tract infections (RTIs) are a common reason for people to consult in primary care, and contribute to antibiotic overuse and antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Alternative approaches to supporting patients with RTIs may help, but it is important to understand public perceptions about these approaches before they are widely implemented. AIM: To describe public perceptions regarding finger-prick testing, back-up antibiotic prescriptions (BUPs), and alternatives to traditional consultations for RTIs, and identify factors associated with favouring these approaches. DESIGN & SETTING: Online national survey (HealthWise Wales) with linked primary care health record data. METHOD: Survey item response distributions were described. Associations between responses about consultation alternatives, BUP, and finger-prick point-of-care testing (POCT), and potential explanatory variables, were explored using logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 8752 participants completed the survey between 2016 and 2018. The survey found 76.7% (n = 3807/4,966) and 71.2% (n = 3529/4,953) of responders with valid responses were in favour of being able to consult with a pharmacist or nurse in their GP surgery, or with a community pharmacist, respectively. It also showed 92.8% (n = 8034/8659) of responders indicated they would be happy to have a finger-prick test to guide antibiotic prescribing, and 31.8% (n = 2746/8646) indicated they would like to be given a BUP if their clinician thought immediate antibiotics were not required. In addition, 47.4% (n = 2342/4944) and 42.3% (n = 2095/4949) were in favour of having video and email consultations, respectively. Characteristics associated with different response options were identified. CONCLUSION: Consulting with pharmacists, using electronic communication tools, and finger-prick testing are widely acceptable approaches. BUP was described as acceptable less often, and is likely to require greater information and support when used. Royal College of General Practitioners 2021-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8170598/ /pubmed/33293410 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2020.0124 Text en Copyright © 2021, The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is Open Access: CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle Research
Moore, Alex
Cannings-John, Rebecca
Butler, Christopher C
McNulty, Cliodna AM
Francis, Nick A
Alternative approaches to managing respiratory tract infections: a survey of public perceptions
title Alternative approaches to managing respiratory tract infections: a survey of public perceptions
title_full Alternative approaches to managing respiratory tract infections: a survey of public perceptions
title_fullStr Alternative approaches to managing respiratory tract infections: a survey of public perceptions
title_full_unstemmed Alternative approaches to managing respiratory tract infections: a survey of public perceptions
title_short Alternative approaches to managing respiratory tract infections: a survey of public perceptions
title_sort alternative approaches to managing respiratory tract infections: a survey of public perceptions
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8170598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33293410
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2020.0124
work_keys_str_mv AT moorealex alternativeapproachestomanagingrespiratorytractinfectionsasurveyofpublicperceptions
AT canningsjohnrebecca alternativeapproachestomanagingrespiratorytractinfectionsasurveyofpublicperceptions
AT butlerchristopherc alternativeapproachestomanagingrespiratorytractinfectionsasurveyofpublicperceptions
AT mcnultycliodnaam alternativeapproachestomanagingrespiratorytractinfectionsasurveyofpublicperceptions
AT francisnicka alternativeapproachestomanagingrespiratorytractinfectionsasurveyofpublicperceptions