Cargando…
Improving team coordination in primary-care settings via multifaceted team-based feedback: a non-randomised controlled trial study
BACKGROUND: Coordination is critical to successful team-based health care. Most clinicians, however, are not trained in effective coordination or teamwork. Audit and feedback (A&F) could improve team coordination, if designed with teams in mind. AIM: The effectiveness of a multifaceted, A&F-...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Royal College of General Practitioners
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8170607/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33563700 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2020.0185 |
_version_ | 1783702278558973952 |
---|---|
author | Hysong, Sylvia J Amspoker, Amber B Hughes, Ashley M Lester, Houston F Svojse, Erica K Khan, Kashif Mehta, Praveen Petersen, Laura A |
author_facet | Hysong, Sylvia J Amspoker, Amber B Hughes, Ashley M Lester, Houston F Svojse, Erica K Khan, Kashif Mehta, Praveen Petersen, Laura A |
author_sort | Hysong, Sylvia J |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Coordination is critical to successful team-based health care. Most clinicians, however, are not trained in effective coordination or teamwork. Audit and feedback (A&F) could improve team coordination, if designed with teams in mind. AIM: The effectiveness of a multifaceted, A&F-plus-debrief intervention was tested to establish whether it improved coordination in primary care teams compared with controls. DESIGN & SETTING: Case-control trial within US Veterans Health Administration medical centres. METHOD: Thirty-four primary care teams selected from four geographically distinct hospitals were compared with 34 administratively matched control teams. Intervention-arm teams received monthly A&F reports about key coordination behaviours and structured debriefings over 7 months. Control teams were followed exclusively via their clinical records. Outcome measures included a coordination composite and its component indicators (appointments starting on time, timely recall scheduling, emergency department utilisation, and electronic patient portal enrolment). Predictors included intervention arm, extent of exposure to intervention, and degree of multiple team membership (MTM). RESULTS: Intervention teams did not significantly improve over control teams, even after adjusting for MTM. Follow-up analyses indicated cross-team variability in intervention fidelity; although all intervention teams received feedback reports, not all teams attended all debriefings. Compared with their respective baselines, teams with high debriefing exposure improved significantly. Teams with high debriefing exposure improved significantly more than teams with low exposure. Low exposure teams significantly increased patient portal enrolment. CONCLUSION: Team-based A&F, including adequate reflection time, can improve coordination; however, the effect is dose dependent. Consistency of debriefing appears more critical than proportion of team members attending a debriefing for ensuring implementation fidelity and effectiveness. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8170607 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Royal College of General Practitioners |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81706072021-06-11 Improving team coordination in primary-care settings via multifaceted team-based feedback: a non-randomised controlled trial study Hysong, Sylvia J Amspoker, Amber B Hughes, Ashley M Lester, Houston F Svojse, Erica K Khan, Kashif Mehta, Praveen Petersen, Laura A BJGP Open Research BACKGROUND: Coordination is critical to successful team-based health care. Most clinicians, however, are not trained in effective coordination or teamwork. Audit and feedback (A&F) could improve team coordination, if designed with teams in mind. AIM: The effectiveness of a multifaceted, A&F-plus-debrief intervention was tested to establish whether it improved coordination in primary care teams compared with controls. DESIGN & SETTING: Case-control trial within US Veterans Health Administration medical centres. METHOD: Thirty-four primary care teams selected from four geographically distinct hospitals were compared with 34 administratively matched control teams. Intervention-arm teams received monthly A&F reports about key coordination behaviours and structured debriefings over 7 months. Control teams were followed exclusively via their clinical records. Outcome measures included a coordination composite and its component indicators (appointments starting on time, timely recall scheduling, emergency department utilisation, and electronic patient portal enrolment). Predictors included intervention arm, extent of exposure to intervention, and degree of multiple team membership (MTM). RESULTS: Intervention teams did not significantly improve over control teams, even after adjusting for MTM. Follow-up analyses indicated cross-team variability in intervention fidelity; although all intervention teams received feedback reports, not all teams attended all debriefings. Compared with their respective baselines, teams with high debriefing exposure improved significantly. Teams with high debriefing exposure improved significantly more than teams with low exposure. Low exposure teams significantly increased patient portal enrolment. CONCLUSION: Team-based A&F, including adequate reflection time, can improve coordination; however, the effect is dose dependent. Consistency of debriefing appears more critical than proportion of team members attending a debriefing for ensuring implementation fidelity and effectiveness. Royal College of General Practitioners 2021-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8170607/ /pubmed/33563700 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2020.0185 Text en Copyright © 2021, The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is Open Access: CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Research Hysong, Sylvia J Amspoker, Amber B Hughes, Ashley M Lester, Houston F Svojse, Erica K Khan, Kashif Mehta, Praveen Petersen, Laura A Improving team coordination in primary-care settings via multifaceted team-based feedback: a non-randomised controlled trial study |
title | Improving team coordination in primary-care settings via multifaceted team-based feedback: a non-randomised controlled trial study |
title_full | Improving team coordination in primary-care settings via multifaceted team-based feedback: a non-randomised controlled trial study |
title_fullStr | Improving team coordination in primary-care settings via multifaceted team-based feedback: a non-randomised controlled trial study |
title_full_unstemmed | Improving team coordination in primary-care settings via multifaceted team-based feedback: a non-randomised controlled trial study |
title_short | Improving team coordination in primary-care settings via multifaceted team-based feedback: a non-randomised controlled trial study |
title_sort | improving team coordination in primary-care settings via multifaceted team-based feedback: a non-randomised controlled trial study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8170607/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33563700 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2020.0185 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hysongsylviaj improvingteamcoordinationinprimarycaresettingsviamultifacetedteambasedfeedbackanonrandomisedcontrolledtrialstudy AT amspokeramberb improvingteamcoordinationinprimarycaresettingsviamultifacetedteambasedfeedbackanonrandomisedcontrolledtrialstudy AT hughesashleym improvingteamcoordinationinprimarycaresettingsviamultifacetedteambasedfeedbackanonrandomisedcontrolledtrialstudy AT lesterhoustonf improvingteamcoordinationinprimarycaresettingsviamultifacetedteambasedfeedbackanonrandomisedcontrolledtrialstudy AT svojseericak improvingteamcoordinationinprimarycaresettingsviamultifacetedteambasedfeedbackanonrandomisedcontrolledtrialstudy AT khankashif improvingteamcoordinationinprimarycaresettingsviamultifacetedteambasedfeedbackanonrandomisedcontrolledtrialstudy AT mehtapraveen improvingteamcoordinationinprimarycaresettingsviamultifacetedteambasedfeedbackanonrandomisedcontrolledtrialstudy AT petersenlauraa improvingteamcoordinationinprimarycaresettingsviamultifacetedteambasedfeedbackanonrandomisedcontrolledtrialstudy |