Cargando…

A method for assessing robustness of the results of a star-shaped network meta-analysis under the unidentifiable consistency assumption

BACKGROUND: In a star-shaped network, pairwise comparisons link treatments with a reference treatment (often placebo or standard care), but not with each other. Thus, comparisons between non-reference treatments rely on indirect evidence, and are based on the unidentifiable consistency assumption, l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yoon, Jeong-Hwa, Dias, Sofia, Hahn, Seokyung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8171049/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34074239
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01290-1
_version_ 1783702355920814080
author Yoon, Jeong-Hwa
Dias, Sofia
Hahn, Seokyung
author_facet Yoon, Jeong-Hwa
Dias, Sofia
Hahn, Seokyung
author_sort Yoon, Jeong-Hwa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In a star-shaped network, pairwise comparisons link treatments with a reference treatment (often placebo or standard care), but not with each other. Thus, comparisons between non-reference treatments rely on indirect evidence, and are based on the unidentifiable consistency assumption, limiting the reliability of the results. We suggest a method of performing a sensitivity analysis through data imputation to assess the robustness of results with an unknown degree of inconsistency. METHODS: The method involves imputation of data for randomized controlled trials comparing non-reference treatments, to produce a complete network. The imputed data simulate a situation that would allow mixed treatment comparison, with a statistically acceptable extent of inconsistency. By comparing the agreement between the results obtained from the original star-shaped network meta-analysis and the results after incorporating the imputed data, the robustness of the results of the original star-shaped network meta-analysis can be quantified and assessed. To illustrate this method, we applied it to two real datasets and some simulated datasets. RESULTS: Applying the method to the star-shaped network formed by discarding all comparisons between non-reference treatments from a real complete network, 33% of the results from the analysis incorporating imputed data under acceptable inconsistency indicated that the treatment ranking would be different from the ranking obtained from the star-shaped network. Through a simulation study, we demonstrated the sensitivity of the results after data imputation for a star-shaped network with different levels of within- and between-study variability. An extended usability of the method was also demonstrated by another example where some head-to-head comparisons were incorporated. CONCLUSIONS: Our method will serve as a practical technique to assess the reliability of results from a star-shaped network meta-analysis under the unverifiable consistency assumption. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12874-021-01290-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8171049
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81710492021-06-03 A method for assessing robustness of the results of a star-shaped network meta-analysis under the unidentifiable consistency assumption Yoon, Jeong-Hwa Dias, Sofia Hahn, Seokyung BMC Med Res Methodol Technical Advance BACKGROUND: In a star-shaped network, pairwise comparisons link treatments with a reference treatment (often placebo or standard care), but not with each other. Thus, comparisons between non-reference treatments rely on indirect evidence, and are based on the unidentifiable consistency assumption, limiting the reliability of the results. We suggest a method of performing a sensitivity analysis through data imputation to assess the robustness of results with an unknown degree of inconsistency. METHODS: The method involves imputation of data for randomized controlled trials comparing non-reference treatments, to produce a complete network. The imputed data simulate a situation that would allow mixed treatment comparison, with a statistically acceptable extent of inconsistency. By comparing the agreement between the results obtained from the original star-shaped network meta-analysis and the results after incorporating the imputed data, the robustness of the results of the original star-shaped network meta-analysis can be quantified and assessed. To illustrate this method, we applied it to two real datasets and some simulated datasets. RESULTS: Applying the method to the star-shaped network formed by discarding all comparisons between non-reference treatments from a real complete network, 33% of the results from the analysis incorporating imputed data under acceptable inconsistency indicated that the treatment ranking would be different from the ranking obtained from the star-shaped network. Through a simulation study, we demonstrated the sensitivity of the results after data imputation for a star-shaped network with different levels of within- and between-study variability. An extended usability of the method was also demonstrated by another example where some head-to-head comparisons were incorporated. CONCLUSIONS: Our method will serve as a practical technique to assess the reliability of results from a star-shaped network meta-analysis under the unverifiable consistency assumption. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12874-021-01290-1. BioMed Central 2021-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8171049/ /pubmed/34074239 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01290-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Technical Advance
Yoon, Jeong-Hwa
Dias, Sofia
Hahn, Seokyung
A method for assessing robustness of the results of a star-shaped network meta-analysis under the unidentifiable consistency assumption
title A method for assessing robustness of the results of a star-shaped network meta-analysis under the unidentifiable consistency assumption
title_full A method for assessing robustness of the results of a star-shaped network meta-analysis under the unidentifiable consistency assumption
title_fullStr A method for assessing robustness of the results of a star-shaped network meta-analysis under the unidentifiable consistency assumption
title_full_unstemmed A method for assessing robustness of the results of a star-shaped network meta-analysis under the unidentifiable consistency assumption
title_short A method for assessing robustness of the results of a star-shaped network meta-analysis under the unidentifiable consistency assumption
title_sort method for assessing robustness of the results of a star-shaped network meta-analysis under the unidentifiable consistency assumption
topic Technical Advance
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8171049/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34074239
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01290-1
work_keys_str_mv AT yoonjeonghwa amethodforassessingrobustnessoftheresultsofastarshapednetworkmetaanalysisundertheunidentifiableconsistencyassumption
AT diassofia amethodforassessingrobustnessoftheresultsofastarshapednetworkmetaanalysisundertheunidentifiableconsistencyassumption
AT hahnseokyung amethodforassessingrobustnessoftheresultsofastarshapednetworkmetaanalysisundertheunidentifiableconsistencyassumption
AT yoonjeonghwa methodforassessingrobustnessoftheresultsofastarshapednetworkmetaanalysisundertheunidentifiableconsistencyassumption
AT diassofia methodforassessingrobustnessoftheresultsofastarshapednetworkmetaanalysisundertheunidentifiableconsistencyassumption
AT hahnseokyung methodforassessingrobustnessoftheresultsofastarshapednetworkmetaanalysisundertheunidentifiableconsistencyassumption