Cargando…
Evaluación del paciente y medida de resultados
Both the initial evaluation and follow-up of patients with osteoarthritis require systematic evaluation of the indicators that provide information on the degree of involvement of the disease and allow its quantification. Reliable measures of disease progression help decision-making by clinicians and...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8171422/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24467959 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0212-6567(14)70042-3 |
_version_ | 1783702424605687808 |
---|---|
author | Pol, Enrique Nieto |
author_facet | Pol, Enrique Nieto |
author_sort | Pol, Enrique Nieto |
collection | PubMed |
description | Both the initial evaluation and follow-up of patients with osteoarthritis require systematic evaluation of the indicators that provide information on the degree of involvement of the disease and allow its quantification. Reliable measures of disease progression help decision-making by clinicians and provide valid information on treatment response and the effectiveness of the distinct therapeutic interventions. The instruments recommended in research, as outcome measures in osteoarthritis, are pain evaluation, assessment of physical function, and self-reported global evaluation. In studies lasting more than 1 year, structural changes are evaluated through simple X-ray. Self-reported quality of life assessment and physician global assessment are also recommended as options. These indicators should be incorporated into routine clinical practice for adequate evaluation and correct follow-up of patients with osteoarthritis. The recommended pain evaluation method for use in clinical practice is the visual analog scale (VAS). The best instrument to evaluate physical function in patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis is the WOMAC scale (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index). For patient-reported global assessment in routine practice, the recommended scales are VAS or the SF-12 (12-item short-form health survey). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8171422 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81714222021-06-11 Evaluación del paciente y medida de resultados Pol, Enrique Nieto Aten Primaria Article Both the initial evaluation and follow-up of patients with osteoarthritis require systematic evaluation of the indicators that provide information on the degree of involvement of the disease and allow its quantification. Reliable measures of disease progression help decision-making by clinicians and provide valid information on treatment response and the effectiveness of the distinct therapeutic interventions. The instruments recommended in research, as outcome measures in osteoarthritis, are pain evaluation, assessment of physical function, and self-reported global evaluation. In studies lasting more than 1 year, structural changes are evaluated through simple X-ray. Self-reported quality of life assessment and physician global assessment are also recommended as options. These indicators should be incorporated into routine clinical practice for adequate evaluation and correct follow-up of patients with osteoarthritis. The recommended pain evaluation method for use in clinical practice is the visual analog scale (VAS). The best instrument to evaluate physical function in patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis is the WOMAC scale (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index). For patient-reported global assessment in routine practice, the recommended scales are VAS or the SF-12 (12-item short-form health survey). Elsevier 2014-01 2014-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8171422/ /pubmed/24467959 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0212-6567(14)70042-3 Text en © 2013 Elsevier España, S.L. Todos los derechos reservados. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Pol, Enrique Nieto Evaluación del paciente y medida de resultados |
title | Evaluación del paciente y medida de resultados |
title_full | Evaluación del paciente y medida de resultados |
title_fullStr | Evaluación del paciente y medida de resultados |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluación del paciente y medida de resultados |
title_short | Evaluación del paciente y medida de resultados |
title_sort | evaluación del paciente y medida de resultados |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8171422/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24467959 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0212-6567(14)70042-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT polenriquenieto evaluaciondelpacienteymedidaderesultados |