Cargando…

Couples extrinsic emotion regulation questionnaire: Psychometric validation in a Chilean population

The way couples regulate their emotions affects the quality of their relationship. Despite this, no evidence-based scales of validity and reliability can measure the intention to regulate emotions in the romantic dyad. In order to address this gap, we developed the Couples Extrinsic Emotion Regulati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kinkead, Ana, Sanduvete-Chaves, Susana, Chacón-Moscoso, Salvador, Salas, Christian E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8172022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34077466
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252329
_version_ 1783702462286266368
author Kinkead, Ana
Sanduvete-Chaves, Susana
Chacón-Moscoso, Salvador
Salas, Christian E.
author_facet Kinkead, Ana
Sanduvete-Chaves, Susana
Chacón-Moscoso, Salvador
Salas, Christian E.
author_sort Kinkead, Ana
collection PubMed
description The way couples regulate their emotions affects the quality of their relationship. Despite this, no evidence-based scales of validity and reliability can measure the intention to regulate emotions in the romantic dyad. In order to address this gap, we developed the Couples Extrinsic Emotion Regulation (CEER) questionnaire. First, we adapted the “Others” subscale from the Emotion Regulation of Others and Self questionnaire (EROS) for any close relationship to measure the intention to regulate emotions in couples; second, the psychometric properties of the CEER questionnaire were studied. For the content validity assessment, 23 experts (47.8% of whom worked in social and health psychology and the psychology of emotions, 17.4% in couples’ therapy, and 34.8% in social science methodologies) participated. A total of 528 Chileans completed the online CEER questionnaire, the relationship satisfaction scale (RAS) and dyadic adjustment scale (DAS): 27.8% were male, age M = 38.7, SD = 10.05, and time of the relationships M = 11.27, SD = 9.82. The content-based validity study made it possible to determine which items to include in the final version. Two unrelated first-order factors structure of the original test fit (RMSEA = .052, GFI = .97, AGFI = .95; CFI = .99; NFI = .98; and NNFI = .98). The CEER(+) and CEER(-) factors presented adequate internal consistency (α = .79; ω = .80 and α = .85; ω = .85, respectively). The discrimination index of the factors were excellent (CEER(+) = .55 and CEER(-) = .63). Validity evidence based on the relations to other variables showed a direct positive relation between CEER(+), RAS and overall DAS, as well as their factors; and a negative relation between CEER(-), RAS overall DAS, as well as their factors. The use of this instrument is recommended for the identification of Chilean couples where at least one of the partners has a less favorable opinion of their relationship, providing relevant data for couple’s therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8172022
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81720222021-06-14 Couples extrinsic emotion regulation questionnaire: Psychometric validation in a Chilean population Kinkead, Ana Sanduvete-Chaves, Susana Chacón-Moscoso, Salvador Salas, Christian E. PLoS One Research Article The way couples regulate their emotions affects the quality of their relationship. Despite this, no evidence-based scales of validity and reliability can measure the intention to regulate emotions in the romantic dyad. In order to address this gap, we developed the Couples Extrinsic Emotion Regulation (CEER) questionnaire. First, we adapted the “Others” subscale from the Emotion Regulation of Others and Self questionnaire (EROS) for any close relationship to measure the intention to regulate emotions in couples; second, the psychometric properties of the CEER questionnaire were studied. For the content validity assessment, 23 experts (47.8% of whom worked in social and health psychology and the psychology of emotions, 17.4% in couples’ therapy, and 34.8% in social science methodologies) participated. A total of 528 Chileans completed the online CEER questionnaire, the relationship satisfaction scale (RAS) and dyadic adjustment scale (DAS): 27.8% were male, age M = 38.7, SD = 10.05, and time of the relationships M = 11.27, SD = 9.82. The content-based validity study made it possible to determine which items to include in the final version. Two unrelated first-order factors structure of the original test fit (RMSEA = .052, GFI = .97, AGFI = .95; CFI = .99; NFI = .98; and NNFI = .98). The CEER(+) and CEER(-) factors presented adequate internal consistency (α = .79; ω = .80 and α = .85; ω = .85, respectively). The discrimination index of the factors were excellent (CEER(+) = .55 and CEER(-) = .63). Validity evidence based on the relations to other variables showed a direct positive relation between CEER(+), RAS and overall DAS, as well as their factors; and a negative relation between CEER(-), RAS overall DAS, as well as their factors. The use of this instrument is recommended for the identification of Chilean couples where at least one of the partners has a less favorable opinion of their relationship, providing relevant data for couple’s therapy. Public Library of Science 2021-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8172022/ /pubmed/34077466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252329 Text en © 2021 Kinkead et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kinkead, Ana
Sanduvete-Chaves, Susana
Chacón-Moscoso, Salvador
Salas, Christian E.
Couples extrinsic emotion regulation questionnaire: Psychometric validation in a Chilean population
title Couples extrinsic emotion regulation questionnaire: Psychometric validation in a Chilean population
title_full Couples extrinsic emotion regulation questionnaire: Psychometric validation in a Chilean population
title_fullStr Couples extrinsic emotion regulation questionnaire: Psychometric validation in a Chilean population
title_full_unstemmed Couples extrinsic emotion regulation questionnaire: Psychometric validation in a Chilean population
title_short Couples extrinsic emotion regulation questionnaire: Psychometric validation in a Chilean population
title_sort couples extrinsic emotion regulation questionnaire: psychometric validation in a chilean population
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8172022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34077466
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252329
work_keys_str_mv AT kinkeadana couplesextrinsicemotionregulationquestionnairepsychometricvalidationinachileanpopulation
AT sanduvetechavessusana couplesextrinsicemotionregulationquestionnairepsychometricvalidationinachileanpopulation
AT chaconmoscososalvador couplesextrinsicemotionregulationquestionnairepsychometricvalidationinachileanpopulation
AT salaschristiane couplesextrinsicemotionregulationquestionnairepsychometricvalidationinachileanpopulation