Cargando…

Considerations on the Castrop formula for calculation of intraocular lens power

BACKGROUND: To explain the concept of the Castrop lens power calculation formula and show the application and results from a large dataset compared to classical formulae. METHODS: The Castrop vergence formula is based on a pseudophakic model eye with 4 refractive surfaces. This was compared against...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Langenbucher, Achim, Szentmáry, Nóra, Cayless, Alan, Weisensee, Johannes, Fabian, Ekkehard, Wendelstein, Jascha, Hoffmann, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8172026/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34077432
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252102
_version_ 1783702463289753600
author Langenbucher, Achim
Szentmáry, Nóra
Cayless, Alan
Weisensee, Johannes
Fabian, Ekkehard
Wendelstein, Jascha
Hoffmann, Peter
author_facet Langenbucher, Achim
Szentmáry, Nóra
Cayless, Alan
Weisensee, Johannes
Fabian, Ekkehard
Wendelstein, Jascha
Hoffmann, Peter
author_sort Langenbucher, Achim
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To explain the concept of the Castrop lens power calculation formula and show the application and results from a large dataset compared to classical formulae. METHODS: The Castrop vergence formula is based on a pseudophakic model eye with 4 refractive surfaces. This was compared against the SRKT, Hoffer-Q, Holladay1, simplified Haigis with 1 optimized constant and Haigis formula with 3 optimized constants. A large dataset of preoperative biometric values, lens power data and postoperative refraction data was split into training and test sets. The training data were used for formula constant optimization, and the test data for cross-validation. Constant optimization was performed for all formulae using nonlinear optimization, minimising root mean squared prediction error. RESULTS: The constants for all formulae were derived with the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm. Applying these constants to the test data, the Castrop formula showed a slightly better performance compared to the classical formulae in terms of prediction error and absolute prediction error. Using the Castrop formula, the standard deviation of the prediction error was lowest at 0.45 dpt, and 95% of all eyes in the test data were within the limit of 0.9 dpt of prediction error. CONCLUSION: The calculation concept of the Castrop formula and one potential option for optimization of the 3 Castrop formula constants (C, H, and R) are presented. In a large dataset of 1452 data points the performance of the Castrop formula was slightly superior to the respective results of the classical formulae such as SRKT, Hoffer-Q, Holladay1 or Haigis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8172026
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81720262021-06-14 Considerations on the Castrop formula for calculation of intraocular lens power Langenbucher, Achim Szentmáry, Nóra Cayless, Alan Weisensee, Johannes Fabian, Ekkehard Wendelstein, Jascha Hoffmann, Peter PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: To explain the concept of the Castrop lens power calculation formula and show the application and results from a large dataset compared to classical formulae. METHODS: The Castrop vergence formula is based on a pseudophakic model eye with 4 refractive surfaces. This was compared against the SRKT, Hoffer-Q, Holladay1, simplified Haigis with 1 optimized constant and Haigis formula with 3 optimized constants. A large dataset of preoperative biometric values, lens power data and postoperative refraction data was split into training and test sets. The training data were used for formula constant optimization, and the test data for cross-validation. Constant optimization was performed for all formulae using nonlinear optimization, minimising root mean squared prediction error. RESULTS: The constants for all formulae were derived with the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm. Applying these constants to the test data, the Castrop formula showed a slightly better performance compared to the classical formulae in terms of prediction error and absolute prediction error. Using the Castrop formula, the standard deviation of the prediction error was lowest at 0.45 dpt, and 95% of all eyes in the test data were within the limit of 0.9 dpt of prediction error. CONCLUSION: The calculation concept of the Castrop formula and one potential option for optimization of the 3 Castrop formula constants (C, H, and R) are presented. In a large dataset of 1452 data points the performance of the Castrop formula was slightly superior to the respective results of the classical formulae such as SRKT, Hoffer-Q, Holladay1 or Haigis. Public Library of Science 2021-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8172026/ /pubmed/34077432 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252102 Text en © 2021 Langenbucher et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Langenbucher, Achim
Szentmáry, Nóra
Cayless, Alan
Weisensee, Johannes
Fabian, Ekkehard
Wendelstein, Jascha
Hoffmann, Peter
Considerations on the Castrop formula for calculation of intraocular lens power
title Considerations on the Castrop formula for calculation of intraocular lens power
title_full Considerations on the Castrop formula for calculation of intraocular lens power
title_fullStr Considerations on the Castrop formula for calculation of intraocular lens power
title_full_unstemmed Considerations on the Castrop formula for calculation of intraocular lens power
title_short Considerations on the Castrop formula for calculation of intraocular lens power
title_sort considerations on the castrop formula for calculation of intraocular lens power
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8172026/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34077432
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252102
work_keys_str_mv AT langenbucherachim considerationsonthecastropformulaforcalculationofintraocularlenspower
AT szentmarynora considerationsonthecastropformulaforcalculationofintraocularlenspower
AT caylessalan considerationsonthecastropformulaforcalculationofintraocularlenspower
AT weisenseejohannes considerationsonthecastropformulaforcalculationofintraocularlenspower
AT fabianekkehard considerationsonthecastropformulaforcalculationofintraocularlenspower
AT wendelsteinjascha considerationsonthecastropformulaforcalculationofintraocularlenspower
AT hoffmannpeter considerationsonthecastropformulaforcalculationofintraocularlenspower