Cargando…
Considerations on the Castrop formula for calculation of intraocular lens power
BACKGROUND: To explain the concept of the Castrop lens power calculation formula and show the application and results from a large dataset compared to classical formulae. METHODS: The Castrop vergence formula is based on a pseudophakic model eye with 4 refractive surfaces. This was compared against...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8172026/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34077432 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252102 |
_version_ | 1783702463289753600 |
---|---|
author | Langenbucher, Achim Szentmáry, Nóra Cayless, Alan Weisensee, Johannes Fabian, Ekkehard Wendelstein, Jascha Hoffmann, Peter |
author_facet | Langenbucher, Achim Szentmáry, Nóra Cayless, Alan Weisensee, Johannes Fabian, Ekkehard Wendelstein, Jascha Hoffmann, Peter |
author_sort | Langenbucher, Achim |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To explain the concept of the Castrop lens power calculation formula and show the application and results from a large dataset compared to classical formulae. METHODS: The Castrop vergence formula is based on a pseudophakic model eye with 4 refractive surfaces. This was compared against the SRKT, Hoffer-Q, Holladay1, simplified Haigis with 1 optimized constant and Haigis formula with 3 optimized constants. A large dataset of preoperative biometric values, lens power data and postoperative refraction data was split into training and test sets. The training data were used for formula constant optimization, and the test data for cross-validation. Constant optimization was performed for all formulae using nonlinear optimization, minimising root mean squared prediction error. RESULTS: The constants for all formulae were derived with the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm. Applying these constants to the test data, the Castrop formula showed a slightly better performance compared to the classical formulae in terms of prediction error and absolute prediction error. Using the Castrop formula, the standard deviation of the prediction error was lowest at 0.45 dpt, and 95% of all eyes in the test data were within the limit of 0.9 dpt of prediction error. CONCLUSION: The calculation concept of the Castrop formula and one potential option for optimization of the 3 Castrop formula constants (C, H, and R) are presented. In a large dataset of 1452 data points the performance of the Castrop formula was slightly superior to the respective results of the classical formulae such as SRKT, Hoffer-Q, Holladay1 or Haigis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8172026 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81720262021-06-14 Considerations on the Castrop formula for calculation of intraocular lens power Langenbucher, Achim Szentmáry, Nóra Cayless, Alan Weisensee, Johannes Fabian, Ekkehard Wendelstein, Jascha Hoffmann, Peter PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: To explain the concept of the Castrop lens power calculation formula and show the application and results from a large dataset compared to classical formulae. METHODS: The Castrop vergence formula is based on a pseudophakic model eye with 4 refractive surfaces. This was compared against the SRKT, Hoffer-Q, Holladay1, simplified Haigis with 1 optimized constant and Haigis formula with 3 optimized constants. A large dataset of preoperative biometric values, lens power data and postoperative refraction data was split into training and test sets. The training data were used for formula constant optimization, and the test data for cross-validation. Constant optimization was performed for all formulae using nonlinear optimization, minimising root mean squared prediction error. RESULTS: The constants for all formulae were derived with the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm. Applying these constants to the test data, the Castrop formula showed a slightly better performance compared to the classical formulae in terms of prediction error and absolute prediction error. Using the Castrop formula, the standard deviation of the prediction error was lowest at 0.45 dpt, and 95% of all eyes in the test data were within the limit of 0.9 dpt of prediction error. CONCLUSION: The calculation concept of the Castrop formula and one potential option for optimization of the 3 Castrop formula constants (C, H, and R) are presented. In a large dataset of 1452 data points the performance of the Castrop formula was slightly superior to the respective results of the classical formulae such as SRKT, Hoffer-Q, Holladay1 or Haigis. Public Library of Science 2021-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8172026/ /pubmed/34077432 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252102 Text en © 2021 Langenbucher et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Langenbucher, Achim Szentmáry, Nóra Cayless, Alan Weisensee, Johannes Fabian, Ekkehard Wendelstein, Jascha Hoffmann, Peter Considerations on the Castrop formula for calculation of intraocular lens power |
title | Considerations on the Castrop formula for calculation of intraocular lens power |
title_full | Considerations on the Castrop formula for calculation of intraocular lens power |
title_fullStr | Considerations on the Castrop formula for calculation of intraocular lens power |
title_full_unstemmed | Considerations on the Castrop formula for calculation of intraocular lens power |
title_short | Considerations on the Castrop formula for calculation of intraocular lens power |
title_sort | considerations on the castrop formula for calculation of intraocular lens power |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8172026/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34077432 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252102 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT langenbucherachim considerationsonthecastropformulaforcalculationofintraocularlenspower AT szentmarynora considerationsonthecastropformulaforcalculationofintraocularlenspower AT caylessalan considerationsonthecastropformulaforcalculationofintraocularlenspower AT weisenseejohannes considerationsonthecastropformulaforcalculationofintraocularlenspower AT fabianekkehard considerationsonthecastropformulaforcalculationofintraocularlenspower AT wendelsteinjascha considerationsonthecastropformulaforcalculationofintraocularlenspower AT hoffmannpeter considerationsonthecastropformulaforcalculationofintraocularlenspower |