Cargando…
Subject Gaps Revisited: Complement Clauses and Complementizer-Trace Effects
This study investigates how filler-gap dependencies associated with subject position are formed in online sentence comprehension. Since Crain and Fodor (1985), “filled-gap” studies have provided evidence that the parser actively seeks to associate a wh-filler with a gap in direct object position of...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8172081/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34093349 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.658364 |
_version_ | 1783702472746860544 |
---|---|
author | Tollan, Rebecca Palaz, Bilge |
author_facet | Tollan, Rebecca Palaz, Bilge |
author_sort | Tollan, Rebecca |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study investigates how filler-gap dependencies associated with subject position are formed in online sentence comprehension. Since Crain and Fodor (1985), “filled-gap” studies have provided evidence that the parser actively seeks to associate a wh-filler with a gap in direct object position of a sentence wherever possible; the evidence that this same process applies for subject position, is, however, more limited (Stowe, 1986; Lee, 2004). We examine the processing of complement clauses, finding that wh dependency formation is actively attempted at embedded subject position (e.g., Kate in Who did Lucy think Kate could drive us home to?), unless, however, the embedded clause contains a complementizer (e.g., Who did Lucy think that Kate … .?). The absence of the dependency formation in the latter case demonstrates that the complementizer-trace effect (cf., (∗)Who did Lucy think that could drive us home to mom?; Perlmutter, 1968) is, like syntactic island constraints (Ross, 1967; Keshev and Meltzer-Asscher, 2017), immediately operative in online structure building. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8172081 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81720812021-06-03 Subject Gaps Revisited: Complement Clauses and Complementizer-Trace Effects Tollan, Rebecca Palaz, Bilge Front Psychol Psychology This study investigates how filler-gap dependencies associated with subject position are formed in online sentence comprehension. Since Crain and Fodor (1985), “filled-gap” studies have provided evidence that the parser actively seeks to associate a wh-filler with a gap in direct object position of a sentence wherever possible; the evidence that this same process applies for subject position, is, however, more limited (Stowe, 1986; Lee, 2004). We examine the processing of complement clauses, finding that wh dependency formation is actively attempted at embedded subject position (e.g., Kate in Who did Lucy think Kate could drive us home to?), unless, however, the embedded clause contains a complementizer (e.g., Who did Lucy think that Kate … .?). The absence of the dependency formation in the latter case demonstrates that the complementizer-trace effect (cf., (∗)Who did Lucy think that could drive us home to mom?; Perlmutter, 1968) is, like syntactic island constraints (Ross, 1967; Keshev and Meltzer-Asscher, 2017), immediately operative in online structure building. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8172081/ /pubmed/34093349 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.658364 Text en Copyright © 2021 Tollan and Palaz. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Tollan, Rebecca Palaz, Bilge Subject Gaps Revisited: Complement Clauses and Complementizer-Trace Effects |
title | Subject Gaps Revisited: Complement Clauses and Complementizer-Trace Effects |
title_full | Subject Gaps Revisited: Complement Clauses and Complementizer-Trace Effects |
title_fullStr | Subject Gaps Revisited: Complement Clauses and Complementizer-Trace Effects |
title_full_unstemmed | Subject Gaps Revisited: Complement Clauses and Complementizer-Trace Effects |
title_short | Subject Gaps Revisited: Complement Clauses and Complementizer-Trace Effects |
title_sort | subject gaps revisited: complement clauses and complementizer-trace effects |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8172081/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34093349 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.658364 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tollanrebecca subjectgapsrevisitedcomplementclausesandcomplementizertraceeffects AT palazbilge subjectgapsrevisitedcomplementclausesandcomplementizertraceeffects |