Cargando…

Non‐invasive prenatal testing for the prenatal screening of sex chromosome aneuploidies: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies

BACKGROUND: There is little evidence on the performance of non‐invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for the detection of fetal sex chromosomal imbalances. In this review, we aimed to appraise and synthesize the literature on the performance of NIPT for the prenatal detection of fetal sex chromosome aneu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Soukkhaphone, Bounhome, Lindsay, Carmen, Langlois, Sylvie, Little, Julian, Rousseau, Francois, Reinharz, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8172189/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33755350
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.1654
_version_ 1783702491247935488
author Soukkhaphone, Bounhome
Lindsay, Carmen
Langlois, Sylvie
Little, Julian
Rousseau, Francois
Reinharz, Daniel
author_facet Soukkhaphone, Bounhome
Lindsay, Carmen
Langlois, Sylvie
Little, Julian
Rousseau, Francois
Reinharz, Daniel
author_sort Soukkhaphone, Bounhome
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is little evidence on the performance of non‐invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for the detection of fetal sex chromosomal imbalances. In this review, we aimed to appraise and synthesize the literature on the performance of NIPT for the prenatal detection of fetal sex chromosome aneuploidies. METHODS: We performed our literature search in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CADTH. Study selection and data extraction were performed by two reviewers independently. There were no restrictions on the study population. Meta‐analyses were performed with “R” software. Pooled sensitivities and specificities with their 95% CI were estimated using a random‐effects model. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed by a Q test. RESULTS: Based on 11 studies in high prior risk pregnancies, including 116 affected fetuses in aggregate, Massively Parallel Shotgun Sequencing (MPSS) had a sensitivity of 93.9% (95% CI 84.1%, 97.8%) and a specificity of 99.6% (95% CI 98.7%, 99.9%) for the detection of 45,X. Based on four studies in high‐risk pregnancies, with 83 affected fetuses in aggregate, Targeted Massively Parallel Sequencing (TMPS) had a sensitivity of 83.2% (95% CI 49.6%, 96.2%) and specificity was 99.8% (95% CI 98.3%, 100%) for the detection of 45,X. In mixed‐risk pregnancies, the sensitivity of TMPS for the detection of 45,X was 90.9% (2 studies; 95% CI 70%, 97.7%) and specificity 99.9% (2 studies; 95% CI 99.4%, 100%); MPSS data were not available in such pregnancies. Based on smaller numbers of studies, and small numbers of affected fetuses in either high‐risk or mixed‐risk pregnancies (using either MPSS or TMPS), the sensitivities and specificities were equal to or greater than 76.2% for 47,XXX, 47,XXY and 47, XYY. The test failures for SCAs were 0.2% (95% CI 0%, 13.6%) for MPSS and 5.6% (95% CI 3.7%, 8.4%) for TMPS. CONCLUSION: High‐quality studies are still desirable in order to estimate the performance of NIPT for the detection of sex chromosome imbalances.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8172189
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81721892021-06-11 Non‐invasive prenatal testing for the prenatal screening of sex chromosome aneuploidies: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies Soukkhaphone, Bounhome Lindsay, Carmen Langlois, Sylvie Little, Julian Rousseau, Francois Reinharz, Daniel Mol Genet Genomic Med Review Articles BACKGROUND: There is little evidence on the performance of non‐invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for the detection of fetal sex chromosomal imbalances. In this review, we aimed to appraise and synthesize the literature on the performance of NIPT for the prenatal detection of fetal sex chromosome aneuploidies. METHODS: We performed our literature search in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CADTH. Study selection and data extraction were performed by two reviewers independently. There were no restrictions on the study population. Meta‐analyses were performed with “R” software. Pooled sensitivities and specificities with their 95% CI were estimated using a random‐effects model. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed by a Q test. RESULTS: Based on 11 studies in high prior risk pregnancies, including 116 affected fetuses in aggregate, Massively Parallel Shotgun Sequencing (MPSS) had a sensitivity of 93.9% (95% CI 84.1%, 97.8%) and a specificity of 99.6% (95% CI 98.7%, 99.9%) for the detection of 45,X. Based on four studies in high‐risk pregnancies, with 83 affected fetuses in aggregate, Targeted Massively Parallel Sequencing (TMPS) had a sensitivity of 83.2% (95% CI 49.6%, 96.2%) and specificity was 99.8% (95% CI 98.3%, 100%) for the detection of 45,X. In mixed‐risk pregnancies, the sensitivity of TMPS for the detection of 45,X was 90.9% (2 studies; 95% CI 70%, 97.7%) and specificity 99.9% (2 studies; 95% CI 99.4%, 100%); MPSS data were not available in such pregnancies. Based on smaller numbers of studies, and small numbers of affected fetuses in either high‐risk or mixed‐risk pregnancies (using either MPSS or TMPS), the sensitivities and specificities were equal to or greater than 76.2% for 47,XXX, 47,XXY and 47, XYY. The test failures for SCAs were 0.2% (95% CI 0%, 13.6%) for MPSS and 5.6% (95% CI 3.7%, 8.4%) for TMPS. CONCLUSION: High‐quality studies are still desirable in order to estimate the performance of NIPT for the detection of sex chromosome imbalances. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8172189/ /pubmed/33755350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.1654 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Review Articles
Soukkhaphone, Bounhome
Lindsay, Carmen
Langlois, Sylvie
Little, Julian
Rousseau, Francois
Reinharz, Daniel
Non‐invasive prenatal testing for the prenatal screening of sex chromosome aneuploidies: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies
title Non‐invasive prenatal testing for the prenatal screening of sex chromosome aneuploidies: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies
title_full Non‐invasive prenatal testing for the prenatal screening of sex chromosome aneuploidies: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies
title_fullStr Non‐invasive prenatal testing for the prenatal screening of sex chromosome aneuploidies: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies
title_full_unstemmed Non‐invasive prenatal testing for the prenatal screening of sex chromosome aneuploidies: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies
title_short Non‐invasive prenatal testing for the prenatal screening of sex chromosome aneuploidies: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies
title_sort non‐invasive prenatal testing for the prenatal screening of sex chromosome aneuploidies: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8172189/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33755350
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.1654
work_keys_str_mv AT soukkhaphonebounhome noninvasiveprenataltestingfortheprenatalscreeningofsexchromosomeaneuploidiesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnostictestaccuracystudies
AT lindsaycarmen noninvasiveprenataltestingfortheprenatalscreeningofsexchromosomeaneuploidiesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnostictestaccuracystudies
AT langloissylvie noninvasiveprenataltestingfortheprenatalscreeningofsexchromosomeaneuploidiesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnostictestaccuracystudies
AT littlejulian noninvasiveprenataltestingfortheprenatalscreeningofsexchromosomeaneuploidiesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnostictestaccuracystudies
AT rousseaufrancois noninvasiveprenataltestingfortheprenatalscreeningofsexchromosomeaneuploidiesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnostictestaccuracystudies
AT reinharzdaniel noninvasiveprenataltestingfortheprenatalscreeningofsexchromosomeaneuploidiesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnostictestaccuracystudies