Cargando…

Using Administrative Data to Assess the Risk of Permanent Work Disability: A Cohort Study

Purpose Unmet rehabilitation needs are common. We therefore developed a risk score using administrative data to assess the risk of permanent work disability. Such a score may support the identification of individuals with a high likelihood of receiving a disability pension. Methods Our sample was a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bethge, Matthias, Spanier, Katja, Streibelt, Marco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8172482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32910345
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10926-020-09926-7
_version_ 1783702538823925760
author Bethge, Matthias
Spanier, Katja
Streibelt, Marco
author_facet Bethge, Matthias
Spanier, Katja
Streibelt, Marco
author_sort Bethge, Matthias
collection PubMed
description Purpose Unmet rehabilitation needs are common. We therefore developed a risk score using administrative data to assess the risk of permanent work disability. Such a score may support the identification of individuals with a high likelihood of receiving a disability pension. Methods Our sample was a random and stratified 1% sample of individuals aged 18–65 years paying pension contributions. From administrative records, we extracted sociodemographic data and data about employment and welfare benefits covering 2010–2012. Our outcome was a pension due to work disability that was requested between January 2013 and December 2017. We developed a comprehensive logistic regression model and used the model estimates to determine the risk score. Results We included 352,140 individuals and counted 6,360 (1.8%) disability pensions during the 5-year follow-up. The area under the receiver operating curve was 0.839 (95% CI 0.834 to 0.844) for the continuous risk score. Using a threshold of ≥ 50 points (20.2% of all individuals), we correctly classified 80.6% of all individuals (sensitivity: 71.5%; specificity: 80.8%). Using ≥ 60 points (9.9% of all individuals), we correctly classified 90.3% (sensitivity: 54.9%; specificity: 91.0%). Individuals with 50 to < 60 points had a five times higher risk of a disability pension compared to individuals with low scores, individuals with ≥ 60 points a 17 times higher risk. Conclusions The risk score offers an opportunity to screen for people with a high risk of permanent work disability. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10926-020-09926-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8172482
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81724822021-06-07 Using Administrative Data to Assess the Risk of Permanent Work Disability: A Cohort Study Bethge, Matthias Spanier, Katja Streibelt, Marco J Occup Rehabil Article Purpose Unmet rehabilitation needs are common. We therefore developed a risk score using administrative data to assess the risk of permanent work disability. Such a score may support the identification of individuals with a high likelihood of receiving a disability pension. Methods Our sample was a random and stratified 1% sample of individuals aged 18–65 years paying pension contributions. From administrative records, we extracted sociodemographic data and data about employment and welfare benefits covering 2010–2012. Our outcome was a pension due to work disability that was requested between January 2013 and December 2017. We developed a comprehensive logistic regression model and used the model estimates to determine the risk score. Results We included 352,140 individuals and counted 6,360 (1.8%) disability pensions during the 5-year follow-up. The area under the receiver operating curve was 0.839 (95% CI 0.834 to 0.844) for the continuous risk score. Using a threshold of ≥ 50 points (20.2% of all individuals), we correctly classified 80.6% of all individuals (sensitivity: 71.5%; specificity: 80.8%). Using ≥ 60 points (9.9% of all individuals), we correctly classified 90.3% (sensitivity: 54.9%; specificity: 91.0%). Individuals with 50 to < 60 points had a five times higher risk of a disability pension compared to individuals with low scores, individuals with ≥ 60 points a 17 times higher risk. Conclusions The risk score offers an opportunity to screen for people with a high risk of permanent work disability. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10926-020-09926-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2020-09-10 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8172482/ /pubmed/32910345 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10926-020-09926-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Bethge, Matthias
Spanier, Katja
Streibelt, Marco
Using Administrative Data to Assess the Risk of Permanent Work Disability: A Cohort Study
title Using Administrative Data to Assess the Risk of Permanent Work Disability: A Cohort Study
title_full Using Administrative Data to Assess the Risk of Permanent Work Disability: A Cohort Study
title_fullStr Using Administrative Data to Assess the Risk of Permanent Work Disability: A Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Using Administrative Data to Assess the Risk of Permanent Work Disability: A Cohort Study
title_short Using Administrative Data to Assess the Risk of Permanent Work Disability: A Cohort Study
title_sort using administrative data to assess the risk of permanent work disability: a cohort study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8172482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32910345
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10926-020-09926-7
work_keys_str_mv AT bethgematthias usingadministrativedatatoassesstheriskofpermanentworkdisabilityacohortstudy
AT spanierkatja usingadministrativedatatoassesstheriskofpermanentworkdisabilityacohortstudy
AT streibeltmarco usingadministrativedatatoassesstheriskofpermanentworkdisabilityacohortstudy