Cargando…
Using Administrative Data to Assess the Risk of Permanent Work Disability: A Cohort Study
Purpose Unmet rehabilitation needs are common. We therefore developed a risk score using administrative data to assess the risk of permanent work disability. Such a score may support the identification of individuals with a high likelihood of receiving a disability pension. Methods Our sample was a...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8172482/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32910345 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10926-020-09926-7 |
_version_ | 1783702538823925760 |
---|---|
author | Bethge, Matthias Spanier, Katja Streibelt, Marco |
author_facet | Bethge, Matthias Spanier, Katja Streibelt, Marco |
author_sort | Bethge, Matthias |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose Unmet rehabilitation needs are common. We therefore developed a risk score using administrative data to assess the risk of permanent work disability. Such a score may support the identification of individuals with a high likelihood of receiving a disability pension. Methods Our sample was a random and stratified 1% sample of individuals aged 18–65 years paying pension contributions. From administrative records, we extracted sociodemographic data and data about employment and welfare benefits covering 2010–2012. Our outcome was a pension due to work disability that was requested between January 2013 and December 2017. We developed a comprehensive logistic regression model and used the model estimates to determine the risk score. Results We included 352,140 individuals and counted 6,360 (1.8%) disability pensions during the 5-year follow-up. The area under the receiver operating curve was 0.839 (95% CI 0.834 to 0.844) for the continuous risk score. Using a threshold of ≥ 50 points (20.2% of all individuals), we correctly classified 80.6% of all individuals (sensitivity: 71.5%; specificity: 80.8%). Using ≥ 60 points (9.9% of all individuals), we correctly classified 90.3% (sensitivity: 54.9%; specificity: 91.0%). Individuals with 50 to < 60 points had a five times higher risk of a disability pension compared to individuals with low scores, individuals with ≥ 60 points a 17 times higher risk. Conclusions The risk score offers an opportunity to screen for people with a high risk of permanent work disability. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10926-020-09926-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8172482 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81724822021-06-07 Using Administrative Data to Assess the Risk of Permanent Work Disability: A Cohort Study Bethge, Matthias Spanier, Katja Streibelt, Marco J Occup Rehabil Article Purpose Unmet rehabilitation needs are common. We therefore developed a risk score using administrative data to assess the risk of permanent work disability. Such a score may support the identification of individuals with a high likelihood of receiving a disability pension. Methods Our sample was a random and stratified 1% sample of individuals aged 18–65 years paying pension contributions. From administrative records, we extracted sociodemographic data and data about employment and welfare benefits covering 2010–2012. Our outcome was a pension due to work disability that was requested between January 2013 and December 2017. We developed a comprehensive logistic regression model and used the model estimates to determine the risk score. Results We included 352,140 individuals and counted 6,360 (1.8%) disability pensions during the 5-year follow-up. The area under the receiver operating curve was 0.839 (95% CI 0.834 to 0.844) for the continuous risk score. Using a threshold of ≥ 50 points (20.2% of all individuals), we correctly classified 80.6% of all individuals (sensitivity: 71.5%; specificity: 80.8%). Using ≥ 60 points (9.9% of all individuals), we correctly classified 90.3% (sensitivity: 54.9%; specificity: 91.0%). Individuals with 50 to < 60 points had a five times higher risk of a disability pension compared to individuals with low scores, individuals with ≥ 60 points a 17 times higher risk. Conclusions The risk score offers an opportunity to screen for people with a high risk of permanent work disability. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10926-020-09926-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2020-09-10 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8172482/ /pubmed/32910345 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10926-020-09926-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Bethge, Matthias Spanier, Katja Streibelt, Marco Using Administrative Data to Assess the Risk of Permanent Work Disability: A Cohort Study |
title | Using Administrative Data to Assess the Risk of Permanent Work Disability: A Cohort Study |
title_full | Using Administrative Data to Assess the Risk of Permanent Work Disability: A Cohort Study |
title_fullStr | Using Administrative Data to Assess the Risk of Permanent Work Disability: A Cohort Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Using Administrative Data to Assess the Risk of Permanent Work Disability: A Cohort Study |
title_short | Using Administrative Data to Assess the Risk of Permanent Work Disability: A Cohort Study |
title_sort | using administrative data to assess the risk of permanent work disability: a cohort study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8172482/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32910345 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10926-020-09926-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bethgematthias usingadministrativedatatoassesstheriskofpermanentworkdisabilityacohortstudy AT spanierkatja usingadministrativedatatoassesstheriskofpermanentworkdisabilityacohortstudy AT streibeltmarco usingadministrativedatatoassesstheriskofpermanentworkdisabilityacohortstudy |