Cargando…

Accuracy of Electrode Placement in IRE Treatment with Navigated Guidance

PURPOSE: Evaluate the accuracy of multiple electrode placements in IRE treatment of liver tumours using a stereotactic CT-based navigation system. METHOD: Analysing data from all IRE treatments of liver tumours at one institution until 31 December 2018. Comparing planned with validated electrode pla...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stillström, David, Sandu, Raluca-Maria, Freedman, Jacob
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8172499/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33474604
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00270-020-02762-5
_version_ 1783702542200340480
author Stillström, David
Sandu, Raluca-Maria
Freedman, Jacob
author_facet Stillström, David
Sandu, Raluca-Maria
Freedman, Jacob
author_sort Stillström, David
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Evaluate the accuracy of multiple electrode placements in IRE treatment of liver tumours using a stereotactic CT-based navigation system. METHOD: Analysing data from all IRE treatments of liver tumours at one institution until 31 December 2018. Comparing planned with validated electrode placement. Analysing lateral and angular errors and parallelism between electrode pairs RESULTS: Eighty-four tumours were treated in 60 patients. Forty-six per cent were hepatocellular carcinoma, and 36% were colorectal liver metastases. The tumours were located in all segments of the liver. Data were complete from 51 treatments. Two hundred and six electrodes and 336 electrode pairs were analysed. The median lateral and angular error, comparing planned and validated electrode placement, was 3.6 mm (range 0.2–13.6 mm) and 3.1° (range 0°–16.1°). All electrodes with a lateral error >10 mm were either re-positioned or excluded before treatment. The median angle between the electrode pairs was 3.8° (range 0.3°–17.2°). There were no electrode placement-related complications. CONCLUSION: The use of a stereotactic CT-based system for navigation of electrode placement in IRE treatment of liver tumours is safe, accurate and user friendly.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8172499
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81724992021-06-07 Accuracy of Electrode Placement in IRE Treatment with Navigated Guidance Stillström, David Sandu, Raluca-Maria Freedman, Jacob Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol Technical Note PURPOSE: Evaluate the accuracy of multiple electrode placements in IRE treatment of liver tumours using a stereotactic CT-based navigation system. METHOD: Analysing data from all IRE treatments of liver tumours at one institution until 31 December 2018. Comparing planned with validated electrode placement. Analysing lateral and angular errors and parallelism between electrode pairs RESULTS: Eighty-four tumours were treated in 60 patients. Forty-six per cent were hepatocellular carcinoma, and 36% were colorectal liver metastases. The tumours were located in all segments of the liver. Data were complete from 51 treatments. Two hundred and six electrodes and 336 electrode pairs were analysed. The median lateral and angular error, comparing planned and validated electrode placement, was 3.6 mm (range 0.2–13.6 mm) and 3.1° (range 0°–16.1°). All electrodes with a lateral error >10 mm were either re-positioned or excluded before treatment. The median angle between the electrode pairs was 3.8° (range 0.3°–17.2°). There were no electrode placement-related complications. CONCLUSION: The use of a stereotactic CT-based system for navigation of electrode placement in IRE treatment of liver tumours is safe, accurate and user friendly. Springer US 2021-01-20 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8172499/ /pubmed/33474604 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00270-020-02762-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Technical Note
Stillström, David
Sandu, Raluca-Maria
Freedman, Jacob
Accuracy of Electrode Placement in IRE Treatment with Navigated Guidance
title Accuracy of Electrode Placement in IRE Treatment with Navigated Guidance
title_full Accuracy of Electrode Placement in IRE Treatment with Navigated Guidance
title_fullStr Accuracy of Electrode Placement in IRE Treatment with Navigated Guidance
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of Electrode Placement in IRE Treatment with Navigated Guidance
title_short Accuracy of Electrode Placement in IRE Treatment with Navigated Guidance
title_sort accuracy of electrode placement in ire treatment with navigated guidance
topic Technical Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8172499/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33474604
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00270-020-02762-5
work_keys_str_mv AT stillstromdavid accuracyofelectrodeplacementiniretreatmentwithnavigatedguidance
AT sanduralucamaria accuracyofelectrodeplacementiniretreatmentwithnavigatedguidance
AT freedmanjacob accuracyofelectrodeplacementiniretreatmentwithnavigatedguidance