Cargando…

Do Emotional Cues Influence the Performance of Domestic Dogs in an Observational Learning Task?

Using social information is not indiscriminate and being able to choose what to copy and from whom to copy is critical. Dogs are able to learn socially, to recognize, and respond to dog as well as human emotional expressions, and to make reputation-like inferences based on how people behave towards...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Albuquerque, Natalia, Savalli, Carine, Cabral, Francisco, Resende, Briseida
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8172801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34093306
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.615074
_version_ 1783702587225145344
author Albuquerque, Natalia
Savalli, Carine
Cabral, Francisco
Resende, Briseida
author_facet Albuquerque, Natalia
Savalli, Carine
Cabral, Francisco
Resende, Briseida
author_sort Albuquerque, Natalia
collection PubMed
description Using social information is not indiscriminate and being able to choose what to copy and from whom to copy is critical. Dogs are able to learn socially, to recognize, and respond to dog as well as human emotional expressions, and to make reputation-like inferences based on how people behave towards their owner. Yet, the mechanisms dogs use for obtaining and utilizing social information are still to be fully understood, especially concerning whether emotional cues influence dogs’ social learning. Therefore, our main aim was to test the hypothesis that an emotionally charged (negative, positive, or neutral) interaction with the demonstrator of a “V” detour task prior to testing would affect subjects’ performance, by: (i) changing the value of the information provided by the demonstrator or (ii) changing the valence of the learning environment. Our experimental design consisted of three phases: pre-test (subjects were allowed to solve the task alone); emotional display (dogs watched the unfamiliar human behaving in either a positive, negative or neutral way towards their owner); test (demonstrator showed the task and subjects were allowed to move freely). Only dogs that failed in pre-test were considered for analysis (n = 46). We analyzed four dependent variables: success, time to solve the task, latency to reach the fence and matching the side of demonstration. For each, we used four models (GEEs and GLMMs) to investigate the effect of (1) demographic factors; (2) experimental design factors (including emotional group); (3) behavior of the dog; and (4) side chosen and matching. All models took into account all trials (random effect included) and the first trials only. Our findings corroborate previous studies of social learning, but present no evidence to sustain our hypothesis. We discuss the possibility of our stimuli not being salient enough in a task that involves highly motivating food and relies on long and highly distracting interval between phases. Nevertheless, these results represent an important contribution to the study of dog behavior and social cognition and pave the way for further investigations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8172801
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81728012021-06-04 Do Emotional Cues Influence the Performance of Domestic Dogs in an Observational Learning Task? Albuquerque, Natalia Savalli, Carine Cabral, Francisco Resende, Briseida Front Psychol Psychology Using social information is not indiscriminate and being able to choose what to copy and from whom to copy is critical. Dogs are able to learn socially, to recognize, and respond to dog as well as human emotional expressions, and to make reputation-like inferences based on how people behave towards their owner. Yet, the mechanisms dogs use for obtaining and utilizing social information are still to be fully understood, especially concerning whether emotional cues influence dogs’ social learning. Therefore, our main aim was to test the hypothesis that an emotionally charged (negative, positive, or neutral) interaction with the demonstrator of a “V” detour task prior to testing would affect subjects’ performance, by: (i) changing the value of the information provided by the demonstrator or (ii) changing the valence of the learning environment. Our experimental design consisted of three phases: pre-test (subjects were allowed to solve the task alone); emotional display (dogs watched the unfamiliar human behaving in either a positive, negative or neutral way towards their owner); test (demonstrator showed the task and subjects were allowed to move freely). Only dogs that failed in pre-test were considered for analysis (n = 46). We analyzed four dependent variables: success, time to solve the task, latency to reach the fence and matching the side of demonstration. For each, we used four models (GEEs and GLMMs) to investigate the effect of (1) demographic factors; (2) experimental design factors (including emotional group); (3) behavior of the dog; and (4) side chosen and matching. All models took into account all trials (random effect included) and the first trials only. Our findings corroborate previous studies of social learning, but present no evidence to sustain our hypothesis. We discuss the possibility of our stimuli not being salient enough in a task that involves highly motivating food and relies on long and highly distracting interval between phases. Nevertheless, these results represent an important contribution to the study of dog behavior and social cognition and pave the way for further investigations. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8172801/ /pubmed/34093306 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.615074 Text en Copyright © 2021 Albuquerque, Savalli, Cabral and Resende. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Albuquerque, Natalia
Savalli, Carine
Cabral, Francisco
Resende, Briseida
Do Emotional Cues Influence the Performance of Domestic Dogs in an Observational Learning Task?
title Do Emotional Cues Influence the Performance of Domestic Dogs in an Observational Learning Task?
title_full Do Emotional Cues Influence the Performance of Domestic Dogs in an Observational Learning Task?
title_fullStr Do Emotional Cues Influence the Performance of Domestic Dogs in an Observational Learning Task?
title_full_unstemmed Do Emotional Cues Influence the Performance of Domestic Dogs in an Observational Learning Task?
title_short Do Emotional Cues Influence the Performance of Domestic Dogs in an Observational Learning Task?
title_sort do emotional cues influence the performance of domestic dogs in an observational learning task?
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8172801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34093306
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.615074
work_keys_str_mv AT albuquerquenatalia doemotionalcuesinfluencetheperformanceofdomesticdogsinanobservationallearningtask
AT savallicarine doemotionalcuesinfluencetheperformanceofdomesticdogsinanobservationallearningtask
AT cabralfrancisco doemotionalcuesinfluencetheperformanceofdomesticdogsinanobservationallearningtask
AT resendebriseida doemotionalcuesinfluencetheperformanceofdomesticdogsinanobservationallearningtask