Cargando…
Development of a balanced scorecard as a strategic performance measurement system for clinical radiology as a cost center
OBJECTIVES: To develop a goal-oriented indicator system based on the balanced scorecard (BSC) concept, which takes into account the perspectives of the referring physician and patient and emphasizes the focus on the internal processes of the radiology department. METHODS: Development of a BSC occurr...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8172821/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34076755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-021-01009-2 |
_version_ | 1783702590906695680 |
---|---|
author | Teichgräber, Ulf Sibbel, Rainer Heinrich, Andreas Güttler, Felix |
author_facet | Teichgräber, Ulf Sibbel, Rainer Heinrich, Andreas Güttler, Felix |
author_sort | Teichgräber, Ulf |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To develop a goal-oriented indicator system based on the balanced scorecard (BSC) concept, which takes into account the perspectives of the referring physician and patient and emphasizes the focus on the internal processes of the radiology department. METHODS: Development of a BSC occurred in six steps: (Step 1) strengths/weaknesses and opportunities/risks (SWOT-) analysis of the radiology department, (Step 2) setting-specific objectives (model, core values, key objective) followed by the development of 4 perspectives, (Step 3) and definition of strategic issues oriented to the value-added chain of the processes of the radiology department. (Step 4) Creation of a “Strategy Map” with regard to the perspective and their cause–effect relationships. (Step 5) Development of an automated key performance indicator (KPI) cockpit for the monitoring, reporting, and management scorecard. RESULTS: A total of 10 success factors were identified using SWOT analysis. The core values include high quality in clinical, teaching, and research areas. The radiological value-added chain is composed of three processing steps. 1. registration, 2. examination, and 3. reading/X-ray demonstration. Three action programs were derived: 1. increase competency (e.g., specialist standard), 2. improve referring physician/patient satisfaction, 3. increase productivity. Daily process monitoring was added to the management cockpit as a monitoring scorecard. The scorecard comprises 18 KPIs and is automatically updated every month. The annual management scorecard comprises 10 KPIs. CONCLUSIONS: The BSC makes it possible to implement a strategy for radiology that is strongly oriented toward the requirements of the referring physicians and the demands of patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8172821 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81728212021-06-17 Development of a balanced scorecard as a strategic performance measurement system for clinical radiology as a cost center Teichgräber, Ulf Sibbel, Rainer Heinrich, Andreas Güttler, Felix Insights Imaging Original Article OBJECTIVES: To develop a goal-oriented indicator system based on the balanced scorecard (BSC) concept, which takes into account the perspectives of the referring physician and patient and emphasizes the focus on the internal processes of the radiology department. METHODS: Development of a BSC occurred in six steps: (Step 1) strengths/weaknesses and opportunities/risks (SWOT-) analysis of the radiology department, (Step 2) setting-specific objectives (model, core values, key objective) followed by the development of 4 perspectives, (Step 3) and definition of strategic issues oriented to the value-added chain of the processes of the radiology department. (Step 4) Creation of a “Strategy Map” with regard to the perspective and their cause–effect relationships. (Step 5) Development of an automated key performance indicator (KPI) cockpit for the monitoring, reporting, and management scorecard. RESULTS: A total of 10 success factors were identified using SWOT analysis. The core values include high quality in clinical, teaching, and research areas. The radiological value-added chain is composed of three processing steps. 1. registration, 2. examination, and 3. reading/X-ray demonstration. Three action programs were derived: 1. increase competency (e.g., specialist standard), 2. improve referring physician/patient satisfaction, 3. increase productivity. Daily process monitoring was added to the management cockpit as a monitoring scorecard. The scorecard comprises 18 KPIs and is automatically updated every month. The annual management scorecard comprises 10 KPIs. CONCLUSIONS: The BSC makes it possible to implement a strategy for radiology that is strongly oriented toward the requirements of the referring physicians and the demands of patients. Springer International Publishing 2021-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8172821/ /pubmed/34076755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-021-01009-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Teichgräber, Ulf Sibbel, Rainer Heinrich, Andreas Güttler, Felix Development of a balanced scorecard as a strategic performance measurement system for clinical radiology as a cost center |
title | Development of a balanced scorecard as a strategic performance measurement system for clinical radiology as a cost center |
title_full | Development of a balanced scorecard as a strategic performance measurement system for clinical radiology as a cost center |
title_fullStr | Development of a balanced scorecard as a strategic performance measurement system for clinical radiology as a cost center |
title_full_unstemmed | Development of a balanced scorecard as a strategic performance measurement system for clinical radiology as a cost center |
title_short | Development of a balanced scorecard as a strategic performance measurement system for clinical radiology as a cost center |
title_sort | development of a balanced scorecard as a strategic performance measurement system for clinical radiology as a cost center |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8172821/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34076755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-021-01009-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT teichgraberulf developmentofabalancedscorecardasastrategicperformancemeasurementsystemforclinicalradiologyasacostcenter AT sibbelrainer developmentofabalancedscorecardasastrategicperformancemeasurementsystemforclinicalradiologyasacostcenter AT heinrichandreas developmentofabalancedscorecardasastrategicperformancemeasurementsystemforclinicalradiologyasacostcenter AT guttlerfelix developmentofabalancedscorecardasastrategicperformancemeasurementsystemforclinicalradiologyasacostcenter |