Cargando…

Thalamic but Not Subthalamic Neuromodulation Simplifies Word Use in Spontaneous Language

Several investigations have shown language impairments following electrode implantation surgery for Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) in movement disorders. The impact of the actual stimulation, however, differs between DBS targets with further deterioration in formal language tests induced by thalamic D...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tiedt, Hannes Ole, Ehlen, Felicitas, Wyrobnik, Michelle, Klostermann, Fabian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8173144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34093151
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.656188
_version_ 1783702664238858240
author Tiedt, Hannes Ole
Ehlen, Felicitas
Wyrobnik, Michelle
Klostermann, Fabian
author_facet Tiedt, Hannes Ole
Ehlen, Felicitas
Wyrobnik, Michelle
Klostermann, Fabian
author_sort Tiedt, Hannes Ole
collection PubMed
description Several investigations have shown language impairments following electrode implantation surgery for Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) in movement disorders. The impact of the actual stimulation, however, differs between DBS targets with further deterioration in formal language tests induced by thalamic DBS in contrast to subtle improvement observed in subthalamic DBS. Here, we studied speech samples from interviews with participants treated with DBS of the thalamic ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM) for essential tremor (ET), or the subthalamic nucleus (STN) for Parkinson’s disease (PD), and healthy volunteers (each n = 13). We analyzed word frequency and the use of open and closed class words. Active DBS increased word frequency in case of VIM, but not STN stimulation. Further, relative to controls, both DBS groups produced fewer open class words. Whereas VIM DBS further decreased the proportion of open class words, it was increased by STN DBS. Thus, VIM DBS favors the use of relatively common words in spontaneous language, compatible with the idea of lexical simplification under thalamic stimulation. The absence or even partial reversal of these effects in patients receiving STN DBS is of interest with respect to biolinguistic concepts suggesting dichotomous thalamic vs. basal ganglia roles in language processing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8173144
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81731442021-06-04 Thalamic but Not Subthalamic Neuromodulation Simplifies Word Use in Spontaneous Language Tiedt, Hannes Ole Ehlen, Felicitas Wyrobnik, Michelle Klostermann, Fabian Front Hum Neurosci Human Neuroscience Several investigations have shown language impairments following electrode implantation surgery for Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) in movement disorders. The impact of the actual stimulation, however, differs between DBS targets with further deterioration in formal language tests induced by thalamic DBS in contrast to subtle improvement observed in subthalamic DBS. Here, we studied speech samples from interviews with participants treated with DBS of the thalamic ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM) for essential tremor (ET), or the subthalamic nucleus (STN) for Parkinson’s disease (PD), and healthy volunteers (each n = 13). We analyzed word frequency and the use of open and closed class words. Active DBS increased word frequency in case of VIM, but not STN stimulation. Further, relative to controls, both DBS groups produced fewer open class words. Whereas VIM DBS further decreased the proportion of open class words, it was increased by STN DBS. Thus, VIM DBS favors the use of relatively common words in spontaneous language, compatible with the idea of lexical simplification under thalamic stimulation. The absence or even partial reversal of these effects in patients receiving STN DBS is of interest with respect to biolinguistic concepts suggesting dichotomous thalamic vs. basal ganglia roles in language processing. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8173144/ /pubmed/34093151 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.656188 Text en Copyright © 2021 Tiedt, Ehlen, Wyrobnik and Klostermann. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Human Neuroscience
Tiedt, Hannes Ole
Ehlen, Felicitas
Wyrobnik, Michelle
Klostermann, Fabian
Thalamic but Not Subthalamic Neuromodulation Simplifies Word Use in Spontaneous Language
title Thalamic but Not Subthalamic Neuromodulation Simplifies Word Use in Spontaneous Language
title_full Thalamic but Not Subthalamic Neuromodulation Simplifies Word Use in Spontaneous Language
title_fullStr Thalamic but Not Subthalamic Neuromodulation Simplifies Word Use in Spontaneous Language
title_full_unstemmed Thalamic but Not Subthalamic Neuromodulation Simplifies Word Use in Spontaneous Language
title_short Thalamic but Not Subthalamic Neuromodulation Simplifies Word Use in Spontaneous Language
title_sort thalamic but not subthalamic neuromodulation simplifies word use in spontaneous language
topic Human Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8173144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34093151
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.656188
work_keys_str_mv AT tiedthannesole thalamicbutnotsubthalamicneuromodulationsimplifiesworduseinspontaneouslanguage
AT ehlenfelicitas thalamicbutnotsubthalamicneuromodulationsimplifiesworduseinspontaneouslanguage
AT wyrobnikmichelle thalamicbutnotsubthalamicneuromodulationsimplifiesworduseinspontaneouslanguage
AT klostermannfabian thalamicbutnotsubthalamicneuromodulationsimplifiesworduseinspontaneouslanguage