Cargando…

The Efficacy of Radiofrequency Ablation for Bone Tumors Unsuitable for Radical Excision

BACKGROUND: Bone tumors can cause severe pain and poor quality of life due to recurrence and non-achievement of complete remission after surgery, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) can be considered for minimally invasive treatment of bone tumors that are difficult to radic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koo, Jun Sung, Chung, So Hak
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Orthopaedic Association 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8173228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34094020
http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios19179
_version_ 1783702684481617920
author Koo, Jun Sung
Chung, So Hak
author_facet Koo, Jun Sung
Chung, So Hak
author_sort Koo, Jun Sung
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Bone tumors can cause severe pain and poor quality of life due to recurrence and non-achievement of complete remission after surgery, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) can be considered for minimally invasive treatment of bone tumors that are difficult to radically excise. In this study, RFA was performed for bone tumors that were difficult to radically excise and did not respond to surgery, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy due to their large sizes and/or locations. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively analyze the clinical characteristics and survival rates of bone tumors after RFA and provide one more treatment option for the future. METHODS: There were 43 patients with bone tumors who underwent percutaneous RFA at our hospital from April 2007 to October 2017. The median age of the patients was 59 years (range, 31–75 years), and the median follow-up duration was 67.2 months (range, 10.2–130.5 months). Of the 43 patients, 26 were male and 17 were female. Thirty-four cases were metastatic bone tumors, 5 were chordomas, 3 were osteosarcomas, and 1 was a giant cell tumor. Pain and functional ability of the patients were evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS) and the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) functional scoring system, respectively. Scores were recorded preoperatively, 1 week postoperatively, and 4 weeks postoperatively. The 1-year, 2-year, and 5-year survival rates were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: The mean VAS score was 8.21 preoperatively. The mean VAS score at 1 week, 4 weeks, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks postoperatively were 3.91, 3.67, 3.31, and 3.12, respectively. The mean preoperative MSTS score was 64.0% (range, 32%–87%). The mean postoperative MSTS score was 71.0% (range, 40%–90%). The 1-year, 2-year, and 5-year survival rates were 95.3%, 69.8%, and 30.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: As per our study findings, RFA was effective in reducing pain and improving functional ability of patients with bone tumors that were difficult to radically excise.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8173228
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Korean Orthopaedic Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81732282021-06-04 The Efficacy of Radiofrequency Ablation for Bone Tumors Unsuitable for Radical Excision Koo, Jun Sung Chung, So Hak Clin Orthop Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Bone tumors can cause severe pain and poor quality of life due to recurrence and non-achievement of complete remission after surgery, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) can be considered for minimally invasive treatment of bone tumors that are difficult to radically excise. In this study, RFA was performed for bone tumors that were difficult to radically excise and did not respond to surgery, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy due to their large sizes and/or locations. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively analyze the clinical characteristics and survival rates of bone tumors after RFA and provide one more treatment option for the future. METHODS: There were 43 patients with bone tumors who underwent percutaneous RFA at our hospital from April 2007 to October 2017. The median age of the patients was 59 years (range, 31–75 years), and the median follow-up duration was 67.2 months (range, 10.2–130.5 months). Of the 43 patients, 26 were male and 17 were female. Thirty-four cases were metastatic bone tumors, 5 were chordomas, 3 were osteosarcomas, and 1 was a giant cell tumor. Pain and functional ability of the patients were evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS) and the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) functional scoring system, respectively. Scores were recorded preoperatively, 1 week postoperatively, and 4 weeks postoperatively. The 1-year, 2-year, and 5-year survival rates were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: The mean VAS score was 8.21 preoperatively. The mean VAS score at 1 week, 4 weeks, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks postoperatively were 3.91, 3.67, 3.31, and 3.12, respectively. The mean preoperative MSTS score was 64.0% (range, 32%–87%). The mean postoperative MSTS score was 71.0% (range, 40%–90%). The 1-year, 2-year, and 5-year survival rates were 95.3%, 69.8%, and 30.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: As per our study findings, RFA was effective in reducing pain and improving functional ability of patients with bone tumors that were difficult to radically excise. The Korean Orthopaedic Association 2021-06 2021-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8173228/ /pubmed/34094020 http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios19179 Text en Copyright © 2021 by The Korean Orthopaedic Association https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Koo, Jun Sung
Chung, So Hak
The Efficacy of Radiofrequency Ablation for Bone Tumors Unsuitable for Radical Excision
title The Efficacy of Radiofrequency Ablation for Bone Tumors Unsuitable for Radical Excision
title_full The Efficacy of Radiofrequency Ablation for Bone Tumors Unsuitable for Radical Excision
title_fullStr The Efficacy of Radiofrequency Ablation for Bone Tumors Unsuitable for Radical Excision
title_full_unstemmed The Efficacy of Radiofrequency Ablation for Bone Tumors Unsuitable for Radical Excision
title_short The Efficacy of Radiofrequency Ablation for Bone Tumors Unsuitable for Radical Excision
title_sort efficacy of radiofrequency ablation for bone tumors unsuitable for radical excision
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8173228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34094020
http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios19179
work_keys_str_mv AT koojunsung theefficacyofradiofrequencyablationforbonetumorsunsuitableforradicalexcision
AT chungsohak theefficacyofradiofrequencyablationforbonetumorsunsuitableforradicalexcision
AT koojunsung efficacyofradiofrequencyablationforbonetumorsunsuitableforradicalexcision
AT chungsohak efficacyofradiofrequencyablationforbonetumorsunsuitableforradicalexcision