Cargando…

Comparison of Cup Setting Angle Accuracy between Computed Tomography-Based and Computed Tomography-Free Navigation in the Same Patients with Crowe's Classification I or II Hip Dysplasia

BACKGROUD: In total hip arthroplasty, the cup setting angle may affect the postoperative results. In recent years, both computed tomography-based navigation and computed tomography-free (imageless) navigation have been reported to produce high accuracy in cup installation; however, no direct compari...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaku, Nobuhiro, Tagomori, Hiroaki, Tsumura, Hiroshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Orthopaedic Association 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8173244/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34094004
http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios20145
_version_ 1783702688451526656
author Kaku, Nobuhiro
Tagomori, Hiroaki
Tsumura, Hiroshi
author_facet Kaku, Nobuhiro
Tagomori, Hiroaki
Tsumura, Hiroshi
author_sort Kaku, Nobuhiro
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUD: In total hip arthroplasty, the cup setting angle may affect the postoperative results. In recent years, both computed tomography-based navigation and computed tomography-free (imageless) navigation have been reported to produce high accuracy in cup installation; however, no direct comparison between these two methods has been performed. The present study aimed to directly compare the cup installation angle accuracy between computed tomography-based navigation and computed tomography-free navigation in patients with Crowe's classification stage I or II dysplastic osteoarthritis and to examine the factors affecting the cup installation accuracy. METHODS: Using both navigation systems for the same technique, primary total hip arthroplasty was performed by the same surgeon in 36 patients. A cup was installed using computed tomography-based navigation, and the installed cup was measured again using computed tomography-free navigation. We compared the error between the target angle and the intraoperative installation angle for each navigation method by performing statistical analyses. RESULTS: For computed tomography-based navigation, errors in the inclination and the anteversion angles compared to the target angle were 3.14° ± 1.55° and 1.47° ± 0.99°, respectively. For computed tomography-free navigation, the inclination and anteversion angle errors were significantly larger, i.e., 6.84° ± 4.78° and 5.43° ± 5.22°, respectively (p < 0.01). The inclination and anteversion angles of computed tomography-free navigation were correlated, and there were no significant factors influencing the error. CONCLUSIONS: Computed tomography-based navigation is more accurate for cup installation than computed tomography-free navigation. When using computed tomography-free navigation, it is necessary to add technical schemes before and during surgery to improve the cup installation accuracy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8173244
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Korean Orthopaedic Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81732442021-06-04 Comparison of Cup Setting Angle Accuracy between Computed Tomography-Based and Computed Tomography-Free Navigation in the Same Patients with Crowe's Classification I or II Hip Dysplasia Kaku, Nobuhiro Tagomori, Hiroaki Tsumura, Hiroshi Clin Orthop Surg Original Article BACKGROUD: In total hip arthroplasty, the cup setting angle may affect the postoperative results. In recent years, both computed tomography-based navigation and computed tomography-free (imageless) navigation have been reported to produce high accuracy in cup installation; however, no direct comparison between these two methods has been performed. The present study aimed to directly compare the cup installation angle accuracy between computed tomography-based navigation and computed tomography-free navigation in patients with Crowe's classification stage I or II dysplastic osteoarthritis and to examine the factors affecting the cup installation accuracy. METHODS: Using both navigation systems for the same technique, primary total hip arthroplasty was performed by the same surgeon in 36 patients. A cup was installed using computed tomography-based navigation, and the installed cup was measured again using computed tomography-free navigation. We compared the error between the target angle and the intraoperative installation angle for each navigation method by performing statistical analyses. RESULTS: For computed tomography-based navigation, errors in the inclination and the anteversion angles compared to the target angle were 3.14° ± 1.55° and 1.47° ± 0.99°, respectively. For computed tomography-free navigation, the inclination and anteversion angle errors were significantly larger, i.e., 6.84° ± 4.78° and 5.43° ± 5.22°, respectively (p < 0.01). The inclination and anteversion angles of computed tomography-free navigation were correlated, and there were no significant factors influencing the error. CONCLUSIONS: Computed tomography-based navigation is more accurate for cup installation than computed tomography-free navigation. When using computed tomography-free navigation, it is necessary to add technical schemes before and during surgery to improve the cup installation accuracy. The Korean Orthopaedic Association 2021-06 2021-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8173244/ /pubmed/34094004 http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios20145 Text en Copyright © 2021 by The Korean Orthopaedic Association https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kaku, Nobuhiro
Tagomori, Hiroaki
Tsumura, Hiroshi
Comparison of Cup Setting Angle Accuracy between Computed Tomography-Based and Computed Tomography-Free Navigation in the Same Patients with Crowe's Classification I or II Hip Dysplasia
title Comparison of Cup Setting Angle Accuracy between Computed Tomography-Based and Computed Tomography-Free Navigation in the Same Patients with Crowe's Classification I or II Hip Dysplasia
title_full Comparison of Cup Setting Angle Accuracy between Computed Tomography-Based and Computed Tomography-Free Navigation in the Same Patients with Crowe's Classification I or II Hip Dysplasia
title_fullStr Comparison of Cup Setting Angle Accuracy between Computed Tomography-Based and Computed Tomography-Free Navigation in the Same Patients with Crowe's Classification I or II Hip Dysplasia
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Cup Setting Angle Accuracy between Computed Tomography-Based and Computed Tomography-Free Navigation in the Same Patients with Crowe's Classification I or II Hip Dysplasia
title_short Comparison of Cup Setting Angle Accuracy between Computed Tomography-Based and Computed Tomography-Free Navigation in the Same Patients with Crowe's Classification I or II Hip Dysplasia
title_sort comparison of cup setting angle accuracy between computed tomography-based and computed tomography-free navigation in the same patients with crowe's classification i or ii hip dysplasia
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8173244/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34094004
http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios20145
work_keys_str_mv AT kakunobuhiro comparisonofcupsettingangleaccuracybetweencomputedtomographybasedandcomputedtomographyfreenavigationinthesamepatientswithcrowesclassificationioriihipdysplasia
AT tagomorihiroaki comparisonofcupsettingangleaccuracybetweencomputedtomographybasedandcomputedtomographyfreenavigationinthesamepatientswithcrowesclassificationioriihipdysplasia
AT tsumurahiroshi comparisonofcupsettingangleaccuracybetweencomputedtomographybasedandcomputedtomographyfreenavigationinthesamepatientswithcrowesclassificationioriihipdysplasia