Cargando…

Clinical use, challenges, and barriers to implementation of deformable image registration in radiotherapy – the need for guidance and QA tools

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the current status of the clinical use of deformable image registration (DIR) in radiotherapy and to gain an understanding of the challenges faced by centres in clinical implementation of DIR, including commissioning and quality assurance (QA), and to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hussein, Mohammad, Akintonde, Adeyemi, McClelland, Jamie, Speight, Richard, Clark, Catharine H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The British Institute of Radiology. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8173691/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33882253
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20210001
_version_ 1783702766754988032
author Hussein, Mohammad
Akintonde, Adeyemi
McClelland, Jamie
Speight, Richard
Clark, Catharine H
author_facet Hussein, Mohammad
Akintonde, Adeyemi
McClelland, Jamie
Speight, Richard
Clark, Catharine H
author_sort Hussein, Mohammad
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the current status of the clinical use of deformable image registration (DIR) in radiotherapy and to gain an understanding of the challenges faced by centres in clinical implementation of DIR, including commissioning and quality assurance (QA), and to determine the barriers faced. The goal was to inform whether additional guidance and QA tools were needed. METHODS: A survey focussed on clinical use, metrics used, how centres would like to use DIR in the future and challenges faced, was designed and sent to 71 radiotherapy centres in the UK. Data were gathered specifically on which centres we using DIR clinically, which applications were being used, what commissioning and QA tests were performed, and what barriers were preventing the integration of DIR into the clinical workflow. Centres that did not use DIR clinically were encouraged to fill in the survey and were asked if they have any future plans and in what timescale. RESULTS: 51 out of 71 (70%) radiotherapy centres responded. 47 centres reported access to a commercial software that could perform DIR. 20 centres already used DIR clinically, and 22 centres had plans to implement an application of DIR within 3 years of the survey. The most common clinical application of DIR was to propagate contours from one scan to another (19 centres). In each of the applications, the types of commissioning and QA tests performed varied depending on the type of application and between centres. Some of the key barriers were determining when a DIR was satisfactory including which metrics to use, and lack of resources. CONCLUSION: The survey results highlighted that there is a need for additional guidelines, training, better tools for commissioning DIR software and for the QA of registration results, which should include developing or recommending which quantitative metrics to use. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This survey has given a useful picture of the clinical use and lack of use of DIR in UK radiotherapy centres. The survey provided useful insight into how centres commission and QA DIR applications, especially the variability among centres. It was also possible to highlight key barriers to implementation and determine factors that may help overcome this which include the need for additional guidance specific to different applications, better tools and metrics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8173691
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The British Institute of Radiology.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81736912021-10-18 Clinical use, challenges, and barriers to implementation of deformable image registration in radiotherapy – the need for guidance and QA tools Hussein, Mohammad Akintonde, Adeyemi McClelland, Jamie Speight, Richard Clark, Catharine H Br J Radiol Full Paper OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the current status of the clinical use of deformable image registration (DIR) in radiotherapy and to gain an understanding of the challenges faced by centres in clinical implementation of DIR, including commissioning and quality assurance (QA), and to determine the barriers faced. The goal was to inform whether additional guidance and QA tools were needed. METHODS: A survey focussed on clinical use, metrics used, how centres would like to use DIR in the future and challenges faced, was designed and sent to 71 radiotherapy centres in the UK. Data were gathered specifically on which centres we using DIR clinically, which applications were being used, what commissioning and QA tests were performed, and what barriers were preventing the integration of DIR into the clinical workflow. Centres that did not use DIR clinically were encouraged to fill in the survey and were asked if they have any future plans and in what timescale. RESULTS: 51 out of 71 (70%) radiotherapy centres responded. 47 centres reported access to a commercial software that could perform DIR. 20 centres already used DIR clinically, and 22 centres had plans to implement an application of DIR within 3 years of the survey. The most common clinical application of DIR was to propagate contours from one scan to another (19 centres). In each of the applications, the types of commissioning and QA tests performed varied depending on the type of application and between centres. Some of the key barriers were determining when a DIR was satisfactory including which metrics to use, and lack of resources. CONCLUSION: The survey results highlighted that there is a need for additional guidelines, training, better tools for commissioning DIR software and for the QA of registration results, which should include developing or recommending which quantitative metrics to use. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This survey has given a useful picture of the clinical use and lack of use of DIR in UK radiotherapy centres. The survey provided useful insight into how centres commission and QA DIR applications, especially the variability among centres. It was also possible to highlight key barriers to implementation and determine factors that may help overcome this which include the need for additional guidance specific to different applications, better tools and metrics. The British Institute of Radiology. 2021-06-01 2021-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8173691/ /pubmed/33882253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20210001 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Full Paper
Hussein, Mohammad
Akintonde, Adeyemi
McClelland, Jamie
Speight, Richard
Clark, Catharine H
Clinical use, challenges, and barriers to implementation of deformable image registration in radiotherapy – the need for guidance and QA tools
title Clinical use, challenges, and barriers to implementation of deformable image registration in radiotherapy – the need for guidance and QA tools
title_full Clinical use, challenges, and barriers to implementation of deformable image registration in radiotherapy – the need for guidance and QA tools
title_fullStr Clinical use, challenges, and barriers to implementation of deformable image registration in radiotherapy – the need for guidance and QA tools
title_full_unstemmed Clinical use, challenges, and barriers to implementation of deformable image registration in radiotherapy – the need for guidance and QA tools
title_short Clinical use, challenges, and barriers to implementation of deformable image registration in radiotherapy – the need for guidance and QA tools
title_sort clinical use, challenges, and barriers to implementation of deformable image registration in radiotherapy – the need for guidance and qa tools
topic Full Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8173691/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33882253
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20210001
work_keys_str_mv AT husseinmohammad clinicalusechallengesandbarrierstoimplementationofdeformableimageregistrationinradiotherapytheneedforguidanceandqatools
AT akintondeadeyemi clinicalusechallengesandbarrierstoimplementationofdeformableimageregistrationinradiotherapytheneedforguidanceandqatools
AT mcclellandjamie clinicalusechallengesandbarrierstoimplementationofdeformableimageregistrationinradiotherapytheneedforguidanceandqatools
AT speightrichard clinicalusechallengesandbarrierstoimplementationofdeformableimageregistrationinradiotherapytheneedforguidanceandqatools
AT clarkcatharineh clinicalusechallengesandbarrierstoimplementationofdeformableimageregistrationinradiotherapytheneedforguidanceandqatools