Cargando…
The effects on self-efficacy, motivation and perceived barriers of an intervention targeting physical activity and sedentary behaviours in office workers: a cluster randomized control trial
BACKGROUND: The importance of physical activity on health is clear, but changing behaviour is difficult. Successful interventions aiming to improve physical activity and reduce sedentary behaviour is therefore of importance. The aim of this study was to evaluate effects on motivation, self-efficacy...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8173750/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34078342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11083-2 |
_version_ | 1783702774729408512 |
---|---|
author | Blom, Victoria Drake, Emma Kallings, Lena V. Ekblom, Maria M. Nooijen, Carla F. J. |
author_facet | Blom, Victoria Drake, Emma Kallings, Lena V. Ekblom, Maria M. Nooijen, Carla F. J. |
author_sort | Blom, Victoria |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The importance of physical activity on health is clear, but changing behaviour is difficult. Successful interventions aiming to improve physical activity and reduce sedentary behaviour is therefore of importance. The aim of this study was to evaluate effects on motivation, self-efficacy and barriers to change behaviour from two different behavioural intervention focusing either on reducing sedentary behaviour or on increasing physical activity as compared to a waiting list control group. METHODS: The study was designed as a cluster randomized control trial (RCT) within two private companies. Self-efficacy, motivation and perceived barriers were together with demographic variables assessed before and after a 6-month intervention. Participant cluster teams were randomly allocated to either the physical activity intervention (iPA), the sedentary behaviour intervention (iSED), or control group. The intervention was multi componential and included motivational counselling based on Cognitive behaviour therapy and Motivational interviewing, group activities and management involvement. Group differences were determined using Bayesian multilevel modelling (parameter estimate; credible interval (CI)), analysing complete cases and those who adhered to the protocol by adhering to at least 3 out of 5 intervention sessions. RESULTS: After the intervention, the complete cases analysis showed that the iPA group had significantly higher autonomous motivation (0.33, CI: 0.05–0.61) and controlled motivation (0.27, CI: 0.04–0.51) for physical activity compared with the control group. The iSED group scored less autonomous and controlled motivation compared to the iPA group (0.38, CI: − 0.69- -0.087 respectively − 0.32, CI: − 0.57-0.07) but no significant differences compared with the control group. Among individuals that adhered to the protocol, the results showed higher scores on Exercise (3.03, CI: 0.28–6.02) and Sedentary self-efficacy (3.59, CI: 0.35–7.15) for individuals in the iPA group and on Sedentary self-efficacy (4.77, CI: 0.59–9.44) for the iSED group compared to the control group. CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that the interventions were successful in increasing self-efficacy in each intervention group and autonomous motivation for exercise in the iPA group, in particular when actively participating in the motivational counselling sessions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8173750 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81737502021-06-03 The effects on self-efficacy, motivation and perceived barriers of an intervention targeting physical activity and sedentary behaviours in office workers: a cluster randomized control trial Blom, Victoria Drake, Emma Kallings, Lena V. Ekblom, Maria M. Nooijen, Carla F. J. BMC Public Health Research BACKGROUND: The importance of physical activity on health is clear, but changing behaviour is difficult. Successful interventions aiming to improve physical activity and reduce sedentary behaviour is therefore of importance. The aim of this study was to evaluate effects on motivation, self-efficacy and barriers to change behaviour from two different behavioural intervention focusing either on reducing sedentary behaviour or on increasing physical activity as compared to a waiting list control group. METHODS: The study was designed as a cluster randomized control trial (RCT) within two private companies. Self-efficacy, motivation and perceived barriers were together with demographic variables assessed before and after a 6-month intervention. Participant cluster teams were randomly allocated to either the physical activity intervention (iPA), the sedentary behaviour intervention (iSED), or control group. The intervention was multi componential and included motivational counselling based on Cognitive behaviour therapy and Motivational interviewing, group activities and management involvement. Group differences were determined using Bayesian multilevel modelling (parameter estimate; credible interval (CI)), analysing complete cases and those who adhered to the protocol by adhering to at least 3 out of 5 intervention sessions. RESULTS: After the intervention, the complete cases analysis showed that the iPA group had significantly higher autonomous motivation (0.33, CI: 0.05–0.61) and controlled motivation (0.27, CI: 0.04–0.51) for physical activity compared with the control group. The iSED group scored less autonomous and controlled motivation compared to the iPA group (0.38, CI: − 0.69- -0.087 respectively − 0.32, CI: − 0.57-0.07) but no significant differences compared with the control group. Among individuals that adhered to the protocol, the results showed higher scores on Exercise (3.03, CI: 0.28–6.02) and Sedentary self-efficacy (3.59, CI: 0.35–7.15) for individuals in the iPA group and on Sedentary self-efficacy (4.77, CI: 0.59–9.44) for the iSED group compared to the control group. CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that the interventions were successful in increasing self-efficacy in each intervention group and autonomous motivation for exercise in the iPA group, in particular when actively participating in the motivational counselling sessions. BioMed Central 2021-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8173750/ /pubmed/34078342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11083-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Blom, Victoria Drake, Emma Kallings, Lena V. Ekblom, Maria M. Nooijen, Carla F. J. The effects on self-efficacy, motivation and perceived barriers of an intervention targeting physical activity and sedentary behaviours in office workers: a cluster randomized control trial |
title | The effects on self-efficacy, motivation and perceived barriers of an intervention targeting physical activity and sedentary behaviours in office workers: a cluster randomized control trial |
title_full | The effects on self-efficacy, motivation and perceived barriers of an intervention targeting physical activity and sedentary behaviours in office workers: a cluster randomized control trial |
title_fullStr | The effects on self-efficacy, motivation and perceived barriers of an intervention targeting physical activity and sedentary behaviours in office workers: a cluster randomized control trial |
title_full_unstemmed | The effects on self-efficacy, motivation and perceived barriers of an intervention targeting physical activity and sedentary behaviours in office workers: a cluster randomized control trial |
title_short | The effects on self-efficacy, motivation and perceived barriers of an intervention targeting physical activity and sedentary behaviours in office workers: a cluster randomized control trial |
title_sort | effects on self-efficacy, motivation and perceived barriers of an intervention targeting physical activity and sedentary behaviours in office workers: a cluster randomized control trial |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8173750/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34078342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11083-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT blomvictoria theeffectsonselfefficacymotivationandperceivedbarriersofaninterventiontargetingphysicalactivityandsedentarybehavioursinofficeworkersaclusterrandomizedcontroltrial AT drakeemma theeffectsonselfefficacymotivationandperceivedbarriersofaninterventiontargetingphysicalactivityandsedentarybehavioursinofficeworkersaclusterrandomizedcontroltrial AT kallingslenav theeffectsonselfefficacymotivationandperceivedbarriersofaninterventiontargetingphysicalactivityandsedentarybehavioursinofficeworkersaclusterrandomizedcontroltrial AT ekblommariam theeffectsonselfefficacymotivationandperceivedbarriersofaninterventiontargetingphysicalactivityandsedentarybehavioursinofficeworkersaclusterrandomizedcontroltrial AT nooijencarlafj theeffectsonselfefficacymotivationandperceivedbarriersofaninterventiontargetingphysicalactivityandsedentarybehavioursinofficeworkersaclusterrandomizedcontroltrial AT blomvictoria effectsonselfefficacymotivationandperceivedbarriersofaninterventiontargetingphysicalactivityandsedentarybehavioursinofficeworkersaclusterrandomizedcontroltrial AT drakeemma effectsonselfefficacymotivationandperceivedbarriersofaninterventiontargetingphysicalactivityandsedentarybehavioursinofficeworkersaclusterrandomizedcontroltrial AT kallingslenav effectsonselfefficacymotivationandperceivedbarriersofaninterventiontargetingphysicalactivityandsedentarybehavioursinofficeworkersaclusterrandomizedcontroltrial AT ekblommariam effectsonselfefficacymotivationandperceivedbarriersofaninterventiontargetingphysicalactivityandsedentarybehavioursinofficeworkersaclusterrandomizedcontroltrial AT nooijencarlafj effectsonselfefficacymotivationandperceivedbarriersofaninterventiontargetingphysicalactivityandsedentarybehavioursinofficeworkersaclusterrandomizedcontroltrial |