Cargando…
A novel specific grading standard study of auto-segmentation of organs at risk in thorax: subjective–objective-combined grading standard
BACKGROUND: To develop a novel subjective–objective-combined (SOC) grading standard for auto-segmentation for each organ at risk (OAR) in the thorax. METHODS: A radiation oncologist manually delineated 13 thoracic OARs from computed tomography (CT) images of 40 patients. OAR auto-segmentation accura...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8173789/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34082755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-021-00890-8 |
_version_ | 1783702778067025920 |
---|---|
author | Ying, Yanchen Wang, Hao Chen, Hua Cheng, Jianfan Gu, Hengle Shao, Yan Duan, Yanhua Feng, Aihui Feng, Wen Fu, Xiaolong Quan, Hong Xu, Zhiyong |
author_facet | Ying, Yanchen Wang, Hao Chen, Hua Cheng, Jianfan Gu, Hengle Shao, Yan Duan, Yanhua Feng, Aihui Feng, Wen Fu, Xiaolong Quan, Hong Xu, Zhiyong |
author_sort | Ying, Yanchen |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To develop a novel subjective–objective-combined (SOC) grading standard for auto-segmentation for each organ at risk (OAR) in the thorax. METHODS: A radiation oncologist manually delineated 13 thoracic OARs from computed tomography (CT) images of 40 patients. OAR auto-segmentation accuracy was graded by five geometric objective indexes, including the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), the difference of the Euclidean distance between centers of mass (ΔCMD), the difference of volume (ΔV), maximum Hausdorff distance (MHD), and average Hausdorff distance (AHD). The grading results were compared with those of the corresponding geometric indexes obtained by geometric objective methods in the other two centers. OAR auto-segmentation accuracy was also graded by our subjective evaluation standard. These grading results were compared with those of DSC. Based on the subjective evaluation standard and the five geometric indexes, the correspondence between the subjective evaluation level and the geometric index range was established for each OAR. RESULTS: For ΔCMD, ΔV, and MHD, the grading results of the geometric objective evaluation methods at our center and the other two centers were inconsistent. For DSC and AHD, the grading results of three centers were consistent. Seven OARs’ grading results in the subjective evaluation standard were inconsistent with those of DSC. Six OARs’ grading results in the subjective evaluation standard were consistent with those of DSC. Finally, we proposed a new evaluation method that combined the subjective evaluation level of those OARs with the range of corresponding DSC to determine the grading standard. If the DSC ranges between the adjacent levels did not overlap, the DSC range was used as the grading standard. Otherwise, the mean value of DSC was used as the grading standard. CONCLUSIONS: A novel OAR-specific SOC grading standard in thorax was developed. The SOC grading standard provides a possible alternative for evaluation of the auto-segmentation accuracy for thoracic OARs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8173789 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81737892021-06-03 A novel specific grading standard study of auto-segmentation of organs at risk in thorax: subjective–objective-combined grading standard Ying, Yanchen Wang, Hao Chen, Hua Cheng, Jianfan Gu, Hengle Shao, Yan Duan, Yanhua Feng, Aihui Feng, Wen Fu, Xiaolong Quan, Hong Xu, Zhiyong Biomed Eng Online Research BACKGROUND: To develop a novel subjective–objective-combined (SOC) grading standard for auto-segmentation for each organ at risk (OAR) in the thorax. METHODS: A radiation oncologist manually delineated 13 thoracic OARs from computed tomography (CT) images of 40 patients. OAR auto-segmentation accuracy was graded by five geometric objective indexes, including the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), the difference of the Euclidean distance between centers of mass (ΔCMD), the difference of volume (ΔV), maximum Hausdorff distance (MHD), and average Hausdorff distance (AHD). The grading results were compared with those of the corresponding geometric indexes obtained by geometric objective methods in the other two centers. OAR auto-segmentation accuracy was also graded by our subjective evaluation standard. These grading results were compared with those of DSC. Based on the subjective evaluation standard and the five geometric indexes, the correspondence between the subjective evaluation level and the geometric index range was established for each OAR. RESULTS: For ΔCMD, ΔV, and MHD, the grading results of the geometric objective evaluation methods at our center and the other two centers were inconsistent. For DSC and AHD, the grading results of three centers were consistent. Seven OARs’ grading results in the subjective evaluation standard were inconsistent with those of DSC. Six OARs’ grading results in the subjective evaluation standard were consistent with those of DSC. Finally, we proposed a new evaluation method that combined the subjective evaluation level of those OARs with the range of corresponding DSC to determine the grading standard. If the DSC ranges between the adjacent levels did not overlap, the DSC range was used as the grading standard. Otherwise, the mean value of DSC was used as the grading standard. CONCLUSIONS: A novel OAR-specific SOC grading standard in thorax was developed. The SOC grading standard provides a possible alternative for evaluation of the auto-segmentation accuracy for thoracic OARs. BioMed Central 2021-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8173789/ /pubmed/34082755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-021-00890-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Ying, Yanchen Wang, Hao Chen, Hua Cheng, Jianfan Gu, Hengle Shao, Yan Duan, Yanhua Feng, Aihui Feng, Wen Fu, Xiaolong Quan, Hong Xu, Zhiyong A novel specific grading standard study of auto-segmentation of organs at risk in thorax: subjective–objective-combined grading standard |
title | A novel specific grading standard study of auto-segmentation of organs at risk in thorax: subjective–objective-combined grading standard |
title_full | A novel specific grading standard study of auto-segmentation of organs at risk in thorax: subjective–objective-combined grading standard |
title_fullStr | A novel specific grading standard study of auto-segmentation of organs at risk in thorax: subjective–objective-combined grading standard |
title_full_unstemmed | A novel specific grading standard study of auto-segmentation of organs at risk in thorax: subjective–objective-combined grading standard |
title_short | A novel specific grading standard study of auto-segmentation of organs at risk in thorax: subjective–objective-combined grading standard |
title_sort | novel specific grading standard study of auto-segmentation of organs at risk in thorax: subjective–objective-combined grading standard |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8173789/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34082755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-021-00890-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yingyanchen anovelspecificgradingstandardstudyofautosegmentationoforgansatriskinthoraxsubjectiveobjectivecombinedgradingstandard AT wanghao anovelspecificgradingstandardstudyofautosegmentationoforgansatriskinthoraxsubjectiveobjectivecombinedgradingstandard AT chenhua anovelspecificgradingstandardstudyofautosegmentationoforgansatriskinthoraxsubjectiveobjectivecombinedgradingstandard AT chengjianfan anovelspecificgradingstandardstudyofautosegmentationoforgansatriskinthoraxsubjectiveobjectivecombinedgradingstandard AT guhengle anovelspecificgradingstandardstudyofautosegmentationoforgansatriskinthoraxsubjectiveobjectivecombinedgradingstandard AT shaoyan anovelspecificgradingstandardstudyofautosegmentationoforgansatriskinthoraxsubjectiveobjectivecombinedgradingstandard AT duanyanhua anovelspecificgradingstandardstudyofautosegmentationoforgansatriskinthoraxsubjectiveobjectivecombinedgradingstandard AT fengaihui anovelspecificgradingstandardstudyofautosegmentationoforgansatriskinthoraxsubjectiveobjectivecombinedgradingstandard AT fengwen anovelspecificgradingstandardstudyofautosegmentationoforgansatriskinthoraxsubjectiveobjectivecombinedgradingstandard AT fuxiaolong anovelspecificgradingstandardstudyofautosegmentationoforgansatriskinthoraxsubjectiveobjectivecombinedgradingstandard AT quanhong anovelspecificgradingstandardstudyofautosegmentationoforgansatriskinthoraxsubjectiveobjectivecombinedgradingstandard AT xuzhiyong anovelspecificgradingstandardstudyofautosegmentationoforgansatriskinthoraxsubjectiveobjectivecombinedgradingstandard AT yingyanchen novelspecificgradingstandardstudyofautosegmentationoforgansatriskinthoraxsubjectiveobjectivecombinedgradingstandard AT wanghao novelspecificgradingstandardstudyofautosegmentationoforgansatriskinthoraxsubjectiveobjectivecombinedgradingstandard AT chenhua novelspecificgradingstandardstudyofautosegmentationoforgansatriskinthoraxsubjectiveobjectivecombinedgradingstandard AT chengjianfan novelspecificgradingstandardstudyofautosegmentationoforgansatriskinthoraxsubjectiveobjectivecombinedgradingstandard AT guhengle novelspecificgradingstandardstudyofautosegmentationoforgansatriskinthoraxsubjectiveobjectivecombinedgradingstandard AT shaoyan novelspecificgradingstandardstudyofautosegmentationoforgansatriskinthoraxsubjectiveobjectivecombinedgradingstandard AT duanyanhua novelspecificgradingstandardstudyofautosegmentationoforgansatriskinthoraxsubjectiveobjectivecombinedgradingstandard AT fengaihui novelspecificgradingstandardstudyofautosegmentationoforgansatriskinthoraxsubjectiveobjectivecombinedgradingstandard AT fengwen novelspecificgradingstandardstudyofautosegmentationoforgansatriskinthoraxsubjectiveobjectivecombinedgradingstandard AT fuxiaolong novelspecificgradingstandardstudyofautosegmentationoforgansatriskinthoraxsubjectiveobjectivecombinedgradingstandard AT quanhong novelspecificgradingstandardstudyofautosegmentationoforgansatriskinthoraxsubjectiveobjectivecombinedgradingstandard AT xuzhiyong novelspecificgradingstandardstudyofautosegmentationoforgansatriskinthoraxsubjectiveobjectivecombinedgradingstandard |