Cargando…

Promoting HIV indicator condition-guided testing in hospital settings (PROTEST 2.0): study protocol for a multicentre interventional study

BACKGROUND: Late presentation remains a key barrier towards controlling the HIV epidemic. Indicator conditions (ICs) are those that are AIDS-defining, associated with a prevalence of undiagnosed HIV > 0.1%, or whose clinical management would be impeded if an HIV infection were undiagnosed. IC-gui...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bogers, Saskia J., Schim van der Loeff, Maarten F., Davidovich, Udi, Boyd, Anders, van der Valk, Marc, Brinkman, Kees, de Bree, Godelieve J., Reiss, Peter, van Bergen, Jan E. A. M., Geerlings, Suzanne E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8173796/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34078315
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-06183-8
_version_ 1783702779726921728
author Bogers, Saskia J.
Schim van der Loeff, Maarten F.
Davidovich, Udi
Boyd, Anders
van der Valk, Marc
Brinkman, Kees
de Bree, Godelieve J.
Reiss, Peter
van Bergen, Jan E. A. M.
Geerlings, Suzanne E.
author_facet Bogers, Saskia J.
Schim van der Loeff, Maarten F.
Davidovich, Udi
Boyd, Anders
van der Valk, Marc
Brinkman, Kees
de Bree, Godelieve J.
Reiss, Peter
van Bergen, Jan E. A. M.
Geerlings, Suzanne E.
author_sort Bogers, Saskia J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Late presentation remains a key barrier towards controlling the HIV epidemic. Indicator conditions (ICs) are those that are AIDS-defining, associated with a prevalence of undiagnosed HIV > 0.1%, or whose clinical management would be impeded if an HIV infection were undiagnosed. IC-guided HIV testing is an effective strategy in identifying undiagnosed HIV, but opportunities for earlier HIV diagnosis through IC-guided testing are being missed. We present a protocol for an interventional study to improve awareness of IC-guided testing and increase HIV testing in patients presenting with ICs in a hospital setting. METHODS: We designed a multicentre interventional study to be implemented at five hospitals in the region of Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Seven ICs were selected for which HIV test ratios (proportion of patients with an IC tested for HIV) will be measured: tuberculosis, cervical/vulvar cancer or high-grade cervical/vulvar dysplasia, malignant lymphoma, hepatitis B and C, and peripheral neuropathy. Prior to the intervention, a baseline assessment of HIV test ratios across ICs will be performed in eligible patients (IC diagnosed January 2015 through May 2020, ≥18 years, not known HIV positive) and an assessment of barriers and facilitators for HIV testing amongst relevant specialties will be conducted using qualitative (interviews) and quantitative methods (questionnaires). The intervention phase will consist of an educational intervention, including presentation of baseline results as competitive graphical audit and feedback combined with discussion on implementation and opportunities for improvement. The effect of the intervention will be assessed by comparing HIV test ratios of the pre-intervention and post-intervention periods. The primary endpoint is the HIV test ratio within ±3 months of IC diagnosis. Secondary endpoints are the HIV test ratio within ±6 months of diagnosis, ratio ever tested for HIV, HIV positivity percentage, proportion of late presenters and proportion with known HIV status prior to initiating treatment for their IC. DISCUSSION: This protocol presents a strategy aimed at increasing awareness of the benefits of IC-guided testing and increasing HIV testing in patients presenting with ICs in hospital settings to identify undiagnosed HIV in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch trial registry: NL7521. Registered 14 February 2019. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-021-06183-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8173796
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81737962021-06-03 Promoting HIV indicator condition-guided testing in hospital settings (PROTEST 2.0): study protocol for a multicentre interventional study Bogers, Saskia J. Schim van der Loeff, Maarten F. Davidovich, Udi Boyd, Anders van der Valk, Marc Brinkman, Kees de Bree, Godelieve J. Reiss, Peter van Bergen, Jan E. A. M. Geerlings, Suzanne E. BMC Infect Dis Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Late presentation remains a key barrier towards controlling the HIV epidemic. Indicator conditions (ICs) are those that are AIDS-defining, associated with a prevalence of undiagnosed HIV > 0.1%, or whose clinical management would be impeded if an HIV infection were undiagnosed. IC-guided HIV testing is an effective strategy in identifying undiagnosed HIV, but opportunities for earlier HIV diagnosis through IC-guided testing are being missed. We present a protocol for an interventional study to improve awareness of IC-guided testing and increase HIV testing in patients presenting with ICs in a hospital setting. METHODS: We designed a multicentre interventional study to be implemented at five hospitals in the region of Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Seven ICs were selected for which HIV test ratios (proportion of patients with an IC tested for HIV) will be measured: tuberculosis, cervical/vulvar cancer or high-grade cervical/vulvar dysplasia, malignant lymphoma, hepatitis B and C, and peripheral neuropathy. Prior to the intervention, a baseline assessment of HIV test ratios across ICs will be performed in eligible patients (IC diagnosed January 2015 through May 2020, ≥18 years, not known HIV positive) and an assessment of barriers and facilitators for HIV testing amongst relevant specialties will be conducted using qualitative (interviews) and quantitative methods (questionnaires). The intervention phase will consist of an educational intervention, including presentation of baseline results as competitive graphical audit and feedback combined with discussion on implementation and opportunities for improvement. The effect of the intervention will be assessed by comparing HIV test ratios of the pre-intervention and post-intervention periods. The primary endpoint is the HIV test ratio within ±3 months of IC diagnosis. Secondary endpoints are the HIV test ratio within ±6 months of diagnosis, ratio ever tested for HIV, HIV positivity percentage, proportion of late presenters and proportion with known HIV status prior to initiating treatment for their IC. DISCUSSION: This protocol presents a strategy aimed at increasing awareness of the benefits of IC-guided testing and increasing HIV testing in patients presenting with ICs in hospital settings to identify undiagnosed HIV in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch trial registry: NL7521. Registered 14 February 2019. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-021-06183-8. BioMed Central 2021-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8173796/ /pubmed/34078315 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-06183-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Bogers, Saskia J.
Schim van der Loeff, Maarten F.
Davidovich, Udi
Boyd, Anders
van der Valk, Marc
Brinkman, Kees
de Bree, Godelieve J.
Reiss, Peter
van Bergen, Jan E. A. M.
Geerlings, Suzanne E.
Promoting HIV indicator condition-guided testing in hospital settings (PROTEST 2.0): study protocol for a multicentre interventional study
title Promoting HIV indicator condition-guided testing in hospital settings (PROTEST 2.0): study protocol for a multicentre interventional study
title_full Promoting HIV indicator condition-guided testing in hospital settings (PROTEST 2.0): study protocol for a multicentre interventional study
title_fullStr Promoting HIV indicator condition-guided testing in hospital settings (PROTEST 2.0): study protocol for a multicentre interventional study
title_full_unstemmed Promoting HIV indicator condition-guided testing in hospital settings (PROTEST 2.0): study protocol for a multicentre interventional study
title_short Promoting HIV indicator condition-guided testing in hospital settings (PROTEST 2.0): study protocol for a multicentre interventional study
title_sort promoting hiv indicator condition-guided testing in hospital settings (protest 2.0): study protocol for a multicentre interventional study
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8173796/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34078315
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-06183-8
work_keys_str_mv AT bogerssaskiaj promotinghivindicatorconditionguidedtestinginhospitalsettingsprotest20studyprotocolforamulticentreinterventionalstudy
AT schimvanderloeffmaartenf promotinghivindicatorconditionguidedtestinginhospitalsettingsprotest20studyprotocolforamulticentreinterventionalstudy
AT davidovichudi promotinghivindicatorconditionguidedtestinginhospitalsettingsprotest20studyprotocolforamulticentreinterventionalstudy
AT boydanders promotinghivindicatorconditionguidedtestinginhospitalsettingsprotest20studyprotocolforamulticentreinterventionalstudy
AT vandervalkmarc promotinghivindicatorconditionguidedtestinginhospitalsettingsprotest20studyprotocolforamulticentreinterventionalstudy
AT brinkmankees promotinghivindicatorconditionguidedtestinginhospitalsettingsprotest20studyprotocolforamulticentreinterventionalstudy
AT debreegodelievej promotinghivindicatorconditionguidedtestinginhospitalsettingsprotest20studyprotocolforamulticentreinterventionalstudy
AT reisspeter promotinghivindicatorconditionguidedtestinginhospitalsettingsprotest20studyprotocolforamulticentreinterventionalstudy
AT vanbergenjaneam promotinghivindicatorconditionguidedtestinginhospitalsettingsprotest20studyprotocolforamulticentreinterventionalstudy
AT geerlingssuzannee promotinghivindicatorconditionguidedtestinginhospitalsettingsprotest20studyprotocolforamulticentreinterventionalstudy
AT promotinghivindicatorconditionguidedtestinginhospitalsettingsprotest20studyprotocolforamulticentreinterventionalstudy