Cargando…

Future directions of Doctor of Public Health education in the United States: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND: The Doctor of Public Health (DrPH) degree is an advanced and terminal professional degree that prepares the future workforce to engage in public health research, teaching, practice, and leadership. The purpose of the present research was to discuss the desirable future direction and opti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Chulwoo, Migliaccio, Gene, Edberg, Mark, Frehywot, Seble, Johnson, Geralyn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8173852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34082751
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11086-z
_version_ 1783702791637696512
author Park, Chulwoo
Migliaccio, Gene
Edberg, Mark
Frehywot, Seble
Johnson, Geralyn
author_facet Park, Chulwoo
Migliaccio, Gene
Edberg, Mark
Frehywot, Seble
Johnson, Geralyn
author_sort Park, Chulwoo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Doctor of Public Health (DrPH) degree is an advanced and terminal professional degree that prepares the future workforce to engage in public health research, teaching, practice, and leadership. The purpose of the present research was to discuss the desirable future direction and optimal education strategies for the DrPH degree in the United States. METHODS: A total of 28 Council on Education for Public Health (CEPH)-accredited DrPH programs in the United States was identified through the Association of Schools and Programs of Public Health (ASPPH) Academic Program Finder. Then, a qualitative analysis was conducted to obtain perspectives from a total of 20 DrPH program directors through in-depth interviews. RESULTS: A DrPH program should be recognized as equal but different from an MPH or a PhD program and strengthen the curriculum of methodology and leadership education. It is important that a DrPH program establishes specific partnerships with other entities and provide funding for students. In addition, rather than being standardized nationwide, there is value in each DrPH program maintaining its unique character and enabling students to be open to all career pathways. CONCLUSIONS: The future of DrPH programs in the twenty-first century should aim at effective interdisciplinary public health approaches that draw from the best of both academic and applied sectors. A DrPH program is expected to provide academic, applied public health, and leadership training for students to pursue careers in either academia or the public/private sector, because public health is an applied social science that bridges the gap between research and practice. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-021-11086-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8173852
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81738522021-06-03 Future directions of Doctor of Public Health education in the United States: a qualitative study Park, Chulwoo Migliaccio, Gene Edberg, Mark Frehywot, Seble Johnson, Geralyn BMC Public Health Research BACKGROUND: The Doctor of Public Health (DrPH) degree is an advanced and terminal professional degree that prepares the future workforce to engage in public health research, teaching, practice, and leadership. The purpose of the present research was to discuss the desirable future direction and optimal education strategies for the DrPH degree in the United States. METHODS: A total of 28 Council on Education for Public Health (CEPH)-accredited DrPH programs in the United States was identified through the Association of Schools and Programs of Public Health (ASPPH) Academic Program Finder. Then, a qualitative analysis was conducted to obtain perspectives from a total of 20 DrPH program directors through in-depth interviews. RESULTS: A DrPH program should be recognized as equal but different from an MPH or a PhD program and strengthen the curriculum of methodology and leadership education. It is important that a DrPH program establishes specific partnerships with other entities and provide funding for students. In addition, rather than being standardized nationwide, there is value in each DrPH program maintaining its unique character and enabling students to be open to all career pathways. CONCLUSIONS: The future of DrPH programs in the twenty-first century should aim at effective interdisciplinary public health approaches that draw from the best of both academic and applied sectors. A DrPH program is expected to provide academic, applied public health, and leadership training for students to pursue careers in either academia or the public/private sector, because public health is an applied social science that bridges the gap between research and practice. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-021-11086-z. BioMed Central 2021-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8173852/ /pubmed/34082751 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11086-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Park, Chulwoo
Migliaccio, Gene
Edberg, Mark
Frehywot, Seble
Johnson, Geralyn
Future directions of Doctor of Public Health education in the United States: a qualitative study
title Future directions of Doctor of Public Health education in the United States: a qualitative study
title_full Future directions of Doctor of Public Health education in the United States: a qualitative study
title_fullStr Future directions of Doctor of Public Health education in the United States: a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Future directions of Doctor of Public Health education in the United States: a qualitative study
title_short Future directions of Doctor of Public Health education in the United States: a qualitative study
title_sort future directions of doctor of public health education in the united states: a qualitative study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8173852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34082751
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11086-z
work_keys_str_mv AT parkchulwoo futuredirectionsofdoctorofpublichealtheducationintheunitedstatesaqualitativestudy
AT migliacciogene futuredirectionsofdoctorofpublichealtheducationintheunitedstatesaqualitativestudy
AT edbergmark futuredirectionsofdoctorofpublichealtheducationintheunitedstatesaqualitativestudy
AT frehywotseble futuredirectionsofdoctorofpublichealtheducationintheunitedstatesaqualitativestudy
AT johnsongeralyn futuredirectionsofdoctorofpublichealtheducationintheunitedstatesaqualitativestudy