Cargando…

Role of positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the evaluation of renal cell carcinoma

INTRODUCTION: Positron emission tomography (PET) is not a standard recommendation in most of the major guidelines for the evaluation of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Earlier studies evaluating PET scan in patients with RCC have provided discordant results. However, with the advent of newer hybrid PET/...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jena, Rahul, Narain, Tushar Aditya, Singh, Uday Pratap, Srivastava, Aneesh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8173953/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34103794
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/iju.IJU_268_20
_version_ 1783702812790620160
author Jena, Rahul
Narain, Tushar Aditya
Singh, Uday Pratap
Srivastava, Aneesh
author_facet Jena, Rahul
Narain, Tushar Aditya
Singh, Uday Pratap
Srivastava, Aneesh
author_sort Jena, Rahul
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Positron emission tomography (PET) is not a standard recommendation in most of the major guidelines for the evaluation of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Earlier studies evaluating PET scan in patients with RCC have provided discordant results. However, with the advent of newer hybrid PET/computed tomography (CT) scanning systems, this modality has shown increased efficacy in the evaluation of primary renal masses along with the detection of extrarenal metastases, restaging recurrent RCC, and also in monitoring response to targeted therapy. We performed a systematic review of the existing literature on the role of PET scan in the evaluation of RCC. METHODOLOGY: We systematically searched the databases of PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Google Scholar to identify studies on the use of PET scan in RCC. Using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines, 94 full-text articles were selected, of which 54 relevant articles were then reviewed, after a consensus by the authors. RESULTS: Several studies have shown similar sensitivity and specificity of fluoro-2-deoxy-2-d-glucose-PET (FDG-PET) scan as compared to conventional CT scan for the initial diagnosis of RCC, and an improved sensitivity and specificity for the detection of metastases and recurrences following curative therapy. The PET scan may also play a role in predicting the initial tumor biology and pathology and predicting the prognosis as well as the response to therapy. CONCLUSION: The current guidelines do not recommend PET scan in the staging armamentarium of RCCs. However, FDG-PET scan is as efficacious, if not better than conventional imaging alone, in the evaluation of the primary and metastatic RCC, as well as in evaluating the response to therapy, due to its ability to pick up areas of increased metabolic activity early on. Newer tracers such as (Ga)68 prostate specific membrane antigen-labeled ligands may help in opening up newer avenues of theragnostics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8173953
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81739532021-06-07 Role of positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the evaluation of renal cell carcinoma Jena, Rahul Narain, Tushar Aditya Singh, Uday Pratap Srivastava, Aneesh Indian J Urol Review Article INTRODUCTION: Positron emission tomography (PET) is not a standard recommendation in most of the major guidelines for the evaluation of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Earlier studies evaluating PET scan in patients with RCC have provided discordant results. However, with the advent of newer hybrid PET/computed tomography (CT) scanning systems, this modality has shown increased efficacy in the evaluation of primary renal masses along with the detection of extrarenal metastases, restaging recurrent RCC, and also in monitoring response to targeted therapy. We performed a systematic review of the existing literature on the role of PET scan in the evaluation of RCC. METHODOLOGY: We systematically searched the databases of PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Google Scholar to identify studies on the use of PET scan in RCC. Using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines, 94 full-text articles were selected, of which 54 relevant articles were then reviewed, after a consensus by the authors. RESULTS: Several studies have shown similar sensitivity and specificity of fluoro-2-deoxy-2-d-glucose-PET (FDG-PET) scan as compared to conventional CT scan for the initial diagnosis of RCC, and an improved sensitivity and specificity for the detection of metastases and recurrences following curative therapy. The PET scan may also play a role in predicting the initial tumor biology and pathology and predicting the prognosis as well as the response to therapy. CONCLUSION: The current guidelines do not recommend PET scan in the staging armamentarium of RCCs. However, FDG-PET scan is as efficacious, if not better than conventional imaging alone, in the evaluation of the primary and metastatic RCC, as well as in evaluating the response to therapy, due to its ability to pick up areas of increased metabolic activity early on. Newer tracers such as (Ga)68 prostate specific membrane antigen-labeled ligands may help in opening up newer avenues of theragnostics. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021 2021-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8173953/ /pubmed/34103794 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/iju.IJU_268_20 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Indian Journal of Urology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Review Article
Jena, Rahul
Narain, Tushar Aditya
Singh, Uday Pratap
Srivastava, Aneesh
Role of positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the evaluation of renal cell carcinoma
title Role of positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the evaluation of renal cell carcinoma
title_full Role of positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the evaluation of renal cell carcinoma
title_fullStr Role of positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the evaluation of renal cell carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Role of positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the evaluation of renal cell carcinoma
title_short Role of positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the evaluation of renal cell carcinoma
title_sort role of positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the evaluation of renal cell carcinoma
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8173953/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34103794
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/iju.IJU_268_20
work_keys_str_mv AT jenarahul roleofpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyintheevaluationofrenalcellcarcinoma
AT naraintusharaditya roleofpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyintheevaluationofrenalcellcarcinoma
AT singhudaypratap roleofpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyintheevaluationofrenalcellcarcinoma
AT srivastavaaneesh roleofpositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyintheevaluationofrenalcellcarcinoma