Cargando…

Deep Neural Network Approach for Continuous ECG‐Based Automated External Defibrillator Shock Advisory System During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

BACKGROUND: Because chest compressions induce artifacts in the ECG, current automated external defibrillators instruct the user to stop cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) while an automated rhythm analysis is performed. It has been shown that minimizing interruptions in CPR increases the chance of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hajeb‐M, Shirin, Cascella, Alicia, Valentine, Matt, Chon, K. H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8174215/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33663222
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.019065
_version_ 1783702859593809920
author Hajeb‐M, Shirin
Cascella, Alicia
Valentine, Matt
Chon, K. H.
author_facet Hajeb‐M, Shirin
Cascella, Alicia
Valentine, Matt
Chon, K. H.
author_sort Hajeb‐M, Shirin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Because chest compressions induce artifacts in the ECG, current automated external defibrillators instruct the user to stop cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) while an automated rhythm analysis is performed. It has been shown that minimizing interruptions in CPR increases the chance of survival. METHODS AND RESULTS: The objective of this study was to apply a deep‐learning algorithm using convolutional layers, residual networks, and bidirectional long short‐term memory method to classify shockable versus nonshockable rhythms in the presence and absence of CPR artifact. Forty subjects' data from Physionet with 1131 shockable and 2741 nonshockable samples contaminated with 43 different CPR artifacts that were acquired from a commercial automated external defibrillator during asystole were used. We had separate data as train and test sets. Using our deep neural network model, the sensitivity and specificity of the shock versus no‐shock decision for the entire data set over the 4‐fold cross‐validation sets were 95.21% and 86.03%, respectively. This result was based on the training and testing of the model using ECG data in both the presence and the absence of CPR artifact. For ECG without CPR artifact, the sensitivity was 99.04% and the specificity was 95.2%. A sensitivity of 94.21% and a specificity of 86.14% were obtained for ECG with CPR artifact. In addition to 4‐fold cross‐validation sets, we also examined leave‐one‐subject‐out validation. The sensitivity and specificity for the case of leave‐one‐subject‐out validation were 92.71% and 97.6%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed trained model can make shock versus nonshock decision in automated external defibrillators, regardless of CPR status. The results meet the American Heart Association's sensitivity requirement (>90%).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8174215
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81742152021-06-11 Deep Neural Network Approach for Continuous ECG‐Based Automated External Defibrillator Shock Advisory System During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Hajeb‐M, Shirin Cascella, Alicia Valentine, Matt Chon, K. H. J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Because chest compressions induce artifacts in the ECG, current automated external defibrillators instruct the user to stop cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) while an automated rhythm analysis is performed. It has been shown that minimizing interruptions in CPR increases the chance of survival. METHODS AND RESULTS: The objective of this study was to apply a deep‐learning algorithm using convolutional layers, residual networks, and bidirectional long short‐term memory method to classify shockable versus nonshockable rhythms in the presence and absence of CPR artifact. Forty subjects' data from Physionet with 1131 shockable and 2741 nonshockable samples contaminated with 43 different CPR artifacts that were acquired from a commercial automated external defibrillator during asystole were used. We had separate data as train and test sets. Using our deep neural network model, the sensitivity and specificity of the shock versus no‐shock decision for the entire data set over the 4‐fold cross‐validation sets were 95.21% and 86.03%, respectively. This result was based on the training and testing of the model using ECG data in both the presence and the absence of CPR artifact. For ECG without CPR artifact, the sensitivity was 99.04% and the specificity was 95.2%. A sensitivity of 94.21% and a specificity of 86.14% were obtained for ECG with CPR artifact. In addition to 4‐fold cross‐validation sets, we also examined leave‐one‐subject‐out validation. The sensitivity and specificity for the case of leave‐one‐subject‐out validation were 92.71% and 97.6%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed trained model can make shock versus nonshock decision in automated external defibrillators, regardless of CPR status. The results meet the American Heart Association's sensitivity requirement (>90%). John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8174215/ /pubmed/33663222 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.019065 Text en © 2021 The Authors and Defibtech LLC. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Research
Hajeb‐M, Shirin
Cascella, Alicia
Valentine, Matt
Chon, K. H.
Deep Neural Network Approach for Continuous ECG‐Based Automated External Defibrillator Shock Advisory System During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
title Deep Neural Network Approach for Continuous ECG‐Based Automated External Defibrillator Shock Advisory System During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
title_full Deep Neural Network Approach for Continuous ECG‐Based Automated External Defibrillator Shock Advisory System During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
title_fullStr Deep Neural Network Approach for Continuous ECG‐Based Automated External Defibrillator Shock Advisory System During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
title_full_unstemmed Deep Neural Network Approach for Continuous ECG‐Based Automated External Defibrillator Shock Advisory System During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
title_short Deep Neural Network Approach for Continuous ECG‐Based Automated External Defibrillator Shock Advisory System During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
title_sort deep neural network approach for continuous ecg‐based automated external defibrillator shock advisory system during cardiopulmonary resuscitation
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8174215/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33663222
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.019065
work_keys_str_mv AT hajebmshirin deepneuralnetworkapproachforcontinuousecgbasedautomatedexternaldefibrillatorshockadvisorysystemduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitation
AT cascellaalicia deepneuralnetworkapproachforcontinuousecgbasedautomatedexternaldefibrillatorshockadvisorysystemduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitation
AT valentinematt deepneuralnetworkapproachforcontinuousecgbasedautomatedexternaldefibrillatorshockadvisorysystemduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitation
AT chonkh deepneuralnetworkapproachforcontinuousecgbasedautomatedexternaldefibrillatorshockadvisorysystemduringcardiopulmonaryresuscitation