Cargando…
Acute Hemodynamic Effects of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Versus Alternative Pacing Strategies in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices
BACKGROUND: The hemodynamic effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are uncharacterized. We aimed to quantify the hemodynamic effects of different ventricular pacing configurations in patients with LVADs, focusing on short‐term changes in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8174219/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33663225 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.018127 |
_version_ | 1783702860614074368 |
---|---|
author | Tomashitis, Brett Baicu, Catalin F. Butschek, Ross A. Jackson, Gregory R. Winterfield, Jeffrey Tedford, Ryan J. Zile, Michael R. Gold, Michael R. Houston, Brian A. |
author_facet | Tomashitis, Brett Baicu, Catalin F. Butschek, Ross A. Jackson, Gregory R. Winterfield, Jeffrey Tedford, Ryan J. Zile, Michael R. Gold, Michael R. Houston, Brian A. |
author_sort | Tomashitis, Brett |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The hemodynamic effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are uncharacterized. We aimed to quantify the hemodynamic effects of different ventricular pacing configurations in patients with LVADs, focusing on short‐term changes in load‐independent right ventricular (RV) contractility. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with LVADs underwent right heart catheterization during spontaneous respiration without sedation and with pressures recorded at end expiration. Right heart catheterization was performed at different pacemaker configurations (biventricular pacing, left ventricular pacing, RV pacing, and unpaced conduction) in a randomly generated sequence with >3 minutes between configuration change and hemodynamic assessment. The right heart catheterization operator was blinded to the sequence. RV maximal change in pressure over time normalized to instantaneous pressure was calculated from digitized hemodynamic waveforms, consistent with a previously validated protocol. Fifteen patients with LVADs who were in sinus rhythm were included. Load‐independent RV contractility, as assessed by RV maximal change in pressure over time normalized to instantaneous pressure, was higher in biventricular pacing compared with unpaced conduction (15.7±7.6 versus 11.0±4.0 s(−1); P=0.003). Thermodilution cardiac output was higher in biventricular pacing compared with unpaced conduction (4.48±0.7 versus 4.38±0.8 L/min; P=0.05). There were no significant differences in heart rate, ventricular filling pressures, or atrioventricular valvular regurgitation across all pacing configurations. CONCLUSIONS: Biventricular pacing acutely improves load‐independent RV contractility in patients with LVADs. Even in these patients with mechanical left ventricular unloading via LVAD who were relative pacing nonresponders (required LVAD support despite cardiac resynchronization therapy), biventricular pacing was acutely beneficial to RV contractility. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8174219 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81742192021-06-11 Acute Hemodynamic Effects of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Versus Alternative Pacing Strategies in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices Tomashitis, Brett Baicu, Catalin F. Butschek, Ross A. Jackson, Gregory R. Winterfield, Jeffrey Tedford, Ryan J. Zile, Michael R. Gold, Michael R. Houston, Brian A. J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: The hemodynamic effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are uncharacterized. We aimed to quantify the hemodynamic effects of different ventricular pacing configurations in patients with LVADs, focusing on short‐term changes in load‐independent right ventricular (RV) contractility. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with LVADs underwent right heart catheterization during spontaneous respiration without sedation and with pressures recorded at end expiration. Right heart catheterization was performed at different pacemaker configurations (biventricular pacing, left ventricular pacing, RV pacing, and unpaced conduction) in a randomly generated sequence with >3 minutes between configuration change and hemodynamic assessment. The right heart catheterization operator was blinded to the sequence. RV maximal change in pressure over time normalized to instantaneous pressure was calculated from digitized hemodynamic waveforms, consistent with a previously validated protocol. Fifteen patients with LVADs who were in sinus rhythm were included. Load‐independent RV contractility, as assessed by RV maximal change in pressure over time normalized to instantaneous pressure, was higher in biventricular pacing compared with unpaced conduction (15.7±7.6 versus 11.0±4.0 s(−1); P=0.003). Thermodilution cardiac output was higher in biventricular pacing compared with unpaced conduction (4.48±0.7 versus 4.38±0.8 L/min; P=0.05). There were no significant differences in heart rate, ventricular filling pressures, or atrioventricular valvular regurgitation across all pacing configurations. CONCLUSIONS: Biventricular pacing acutely improves load‐independent RV contractility in patients with LVADs. Even in these patients with mechanical left ventricular unloading via LVAD who were relative pacing nonresponders (required LVAD support despite cardiac resynchronization therapy), biventricular pacing was acutely beneficial to RV contractility. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8174219/ /pubmed/33663225 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.018127 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Tomashitis, Brett Baicu, Catalin F. Butschek, Ross A. Jackson, Gregory R. Winterfield, Jeffrey Tedford, Ryan J. Zile, Michael R. Gold, Michael R. Houston, Brian A. Acute Hemodynamic Effects of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Versus Alternative Pacing Strategies in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices |
title | Acute Hemodynamic Effects of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Versus Alternative Pacing Strategies in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices |
title_full | Acute Hemodynamic Effects of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Versus Alternative Pacing Strategies in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices |
title_fullStr | Acute Hemodynamic Effects of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Versus Alternative Pacing Strategies in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices |
title_full_unstemmed | Acute Hemodynamic Effects of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Versus Alternative Pacing Strategies in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices |
title_short | Acute Hemodynamic Effects of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Versus Alternative Pacing Strategies in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices |
title_sort | acute hemodynamic effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy versus alternative pacing strategies in patients with left ventricular assist devices |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8174219/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33663225 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.018127 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tomashitisbrett acutehemodynamiceffectsofcardiacresynchronizationtherapyversusalternativepacingstrategiesinpatientswithleftventricularassistdevices AT baicucatalinf acutehemodynamiceffectsofcardiacresynchronizationtherapyversusalternativepacingstrategiesinpatientswithleftventricularassistdevices AT butschekrossa acutehemodynamiceffectsofcardiacresynchronizationtherapyversusalternativepacingstrategiesinpatientswithleftventricularassistdevices AT jacksongregoryr acutehemodynamiceffectsofcardiacresynchronizationtherapyversusalternativepacingstrategiesinpatientswithleftventricularassistdevices AT winterfieldjeffrey acutehemodynamiceffectsofcardiacresynchronizationtherapyversusalternativepacingstrategiesinpatientswithleftventricularassistdevices AT tedfordryanj acutehemodynamiceffectsofcardiacresynchronizationtherapyversusalternativepacingstrategiesinpatientswithleftventricularassistdevices AT zilemichaelr acutehemodynamiceffectsofcardiacresynchronizationtherapyversusalternativepacingstrategiesinpatientswithleftventricularassistdevices AT goldmichaelr acutehemodynamiceffectsofcardiacresynchronizationtherapyversusalternativepacingstrategiesinpatientswithleftventricularassistdevices AT houstonbriana acutehemodynamiceffectsofcardiacresynchronizationtherapyversusalternativepacingstrategiesinpatientswithleftventricularassistdevices |