Cargando…
Women in Cardiology Twitter Network: An Analysis of a Global Professional Virtual Community From 2016 to 2019
BACKGROUND: Social media is an effective channel for the advancement of women physicians; however, its use by women in cardiology has not been systematically studied. Our study seeks to characterize the current Women in Cardiology Twitter network. METHODS AND RESULTS: Six women‐specific cardiology T...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8174265/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33619976 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.019321 |
_version_ | 1783702870940450816 |
---|---|
author | Chandra, Neha V. Hsiao, Ruth Shapiro, Hilary Snow, Sarah Truong, Katie Beach, Shire Brown, Sherry‐Ann Calfon Press, Marcella A. Gulati, Martha Horwich, Tamara B. Lundberg, Gina P. Michos, Erin D. Parwani, Purvi Thamman, Ritu Watson, Karol E. Han, Janet K. |
author_facet | Chandra, Neha V. Hsiao, Ruth Shapiro, Hilary Snow, Sarah Truong, Katie Beach, Shire Brown, Sherry‐Ann Calfon Press, Marcella A. Gulati, Martha Horwich, Tamara B. Lundberg, Gina P. Michos, Erin D. Parwani, Purvi Thamman, Ritu Watson, Karol E. Han, Janet K. |
author_sort | Chandra, Neha V. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Social media is an effective channel for the advancement of women physicians; however, its use by women in cardiology has not been systematically studied. Our study seeks to characterize the current Women in Cardiology Twitter network. METHODS AND RESULTS: Six women‐specific cardiology Twitter hashtags were analyzed: #ACCWIC (American College of Cardiology Women in Cardiology), #AHAWIC (American Heart Association Women in Cardiology), #ilooklikeacardiologist, #SCAIWIN (Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Women in Innovations), #WomeninCardiology, and #WomeninEP (Women in Electrophysiology). Twitter data from 2016 to 2019 were obtained from Symplur Signals. Quantitative and descriptive content analyses were performed. The Women in Cardiology Twitter network generated 48 236 tweets, 266 180 903 impressions, and 12 485 users. Tweets increased by 706% (from 2083 to 16 780), impressions by 207% (from 26 755 476 to 82 080 472), and users by 440% (from 796 to 4300), including a 471% user increase internationally. The network generated 6530 (13%) original tweets and 43 103 (86%) amplification tweets. Most original and amplification tweets were authored by women (81% and 62%, respectively) and women physicians (76% and 52%, respectively), with an increase in original and amplification tweets authored by academic women physicians (98% and 109%, respectively) and trainees (390% and 249%, respectively) over time. Community building, professional development, and gender advocacy were the most common tweet contents over the study period. Community building was the most common tweet category for #ACCWIC, #AHAWIC, #ilooklikeacardiologist, #SCAIWIN, and #WomeninCardiology, whereas professional development was most common for #WomeninEP. CONCLUSIONS: The Women in Cardiology Twitter network has grown immensely from 2016 to 2019, with women physicians as the driving contributors. This network has become an important channel for community building, professional development, and gender advocacy discussions in an effort to advance women in cardiology. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8174265 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81742652021-06-11 Women in Cardiology Twitter Network: An Analysis of a Global Professional Virtual Community From 2016 to 2019 Chandra, Neha V. Hsiao, Ruth Shapiro, Hilary Snow, Sarah Truong, Katie Beach, Shire Brown, Sherry‐Ann Calfon Press, Marcella A. Gulati, Martha Horwich, Tamara B. Lundberg, Gina P. Michos, Erin D. Parwani, Purvi Thamman, Ritu Watson, Karol E. Han, Janet K. J Am Heart Assoc Go Red for Women Spotlight BACKGROUND: Social media is an effective channel for the advancement of women physicians; however, its use by women in cardiology has not been systematically studied. Our study seeks to characterize the current Women in Cardiology Twitter network. METHODS AND RESULTS: Six women‐specific cardiology Twitter hashtags were analyzed: #ACCWIC (American College of Cardiology Women in Cardiology), #AHAWIC (American Heart Association Women in Cardiology), #ilooklikeacardiologist, #SCAIWIN (Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Women in Innovations), #WomeninCardiology, and #WomeninEP (Women in Electrophysiology). Twitter data from 2016 to 2019 were obtained from Symplur Signals. Quantitative and descriptive content analyses were performed. The Women in Cardiology Twitter network generated 48 236 tweets, 266 180 903 impressions, and 12 485 users. Tweets increased by 706% (from 2083 to 16 780), impressions by 207% (from 26 755 476 to 82 080 472), and users by 440% (from 796 to 4300), including a 471% user increase internationally. The network generated 6530 (13%) original tweets and 43 103 (86%) amplification tweets. Most original and amplification tweets were authored by women (81% and 62%, respectively) and women physicians (76% and 52%, respectively), with an increase in original and amplification tweets authored by academic women physicians (98% and 109%, respectively) and trainees (390% and 249%, respectively) over time. Community building, professional development, and gender advocacy were the most common tweet contents over the study period. Community building was the most common tweet category for #ACCWIC, #AHAWIC, #ilooklikeacardiologist, #SCAIWIN, and #WomeninCardiology, whereas professional development was most common for #WomeninEP. CONCLUSIONS: The Women in Cardiology Twitter network has grown immensely from 2016 to 2019, with women physicians as the driving contributors. This network has become an important channel for community building, professional development, and gender advocacy discussions in an effort to advance women in cardiology. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8174265/ /pubmed/33619976 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.019321 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Go Red for Women Spotlight Chandra, Neha V. Hsiao, Ruth Shapiro, Hilary Snow, Sarah Truong, Katie Beach, Shire Brown, Sherry‐Ann Calfon Press, Marcella A. Gulati, Martha Horwich, Tamara B. Lundberg, Gina P. Michos, Erin D. Parwani, Purvi Thamman, Ritu Watson, Karol E. Han, Janet K. Women in Cardiology Twitter Network: An Analysis of a Global Professional Virtual Community From 2016 to 2019 |
title | Women in Cardiology Twitter Network: An Analysis of a Global Professional Virtual Community From 2016 to 2019 |
title_full | Women in Cardiology Twitter Network: An Analysis of a Global Professional Virtual Community From 2016 to 2019 |
title_fullStr | Women in Cardiology Twitter Network: An Analysis of a Global Professional Virtual Community From 2016 to 2019 |
title_full_unstemmed | Women in Cardiology Twitter Network: An Analysis of a Global Professional Virtual Community From 2016 to 2019 |
title_short | Women in Cardiology Twitter Network: An Analysis of a Global Professional Virtual Community From 2016 to 2019 |
title_sort | women in cardiology twitter network: an analysis of a global professional virtual community from 2016 to 2019 |
topic | Go Red for Women Spotlight |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8174265/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33619976 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.019321 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chandranehav womenincardiologytwitternetworkananalysisofaglobalprofessionalvirtualcommunityfrom2016to2019 AT hsiaoruth womenincardiologytwitternetworkananalysisofaglobalprofessionalvirtualcommunityfrom2016to2019 AT shapirohilary womenincardiologytwitternetworkananalysisofaglobalprofessionalvirtualcommunityfrom2016to2019 AT snowsarah womenincardiologytwitternetworkananalysisofaglobalprofessionalvirtualcommunityfrom2016to2019 AT truongkatie womenincardiologytwitternetworkananalysisofaglobalprofessionalvirtualcommunityfrom2016to2019 AT beachshire womenincardiologytwitternetworkananalysisofaglobalprofessionalvirtualcommunityfrom2016to2019 AT brownsherryann womenincardiologytwitternetworkananalysisofaglobalprofessionalvirtualcommunityfrom2016to2019 AT calfonpressmarcellaa womenincardiologytwitternetworkananalysisofaglobalprofessionalvirtualcommunityfrom2016to2019 AT gulatimartha womenincardiologytwitternetworkananalysisofaglobalprofessionalvirtualcommunityfrom2016to2019 AT horwichtamarab womenincardiologytwitternetworkananalysisofaglobalprofessionalvirtualcommunityfrom2016to2019 AT lundbergginap womenincardiologytwitternetworkananalysisofaglobalprofessionalvirtualcommunityfrom2016to2019 AT michoserind womenincardiologytwitternetworkananalysisofaglobalprofessionalvirtualcommunityfrom2016to2019 AT parwanipurvi womenincardiologytwitternetworkananalysisofaglobalprofessionalvirtualcommunityfrom2016to2019 AT thammanritu womenincardiologytwitternetworkananalysisofaglobalprofessionalvirtualcommunityfrom2016to2019 AT watsonkarole womenincardiologytwitternetworkananalysisofaglobalprofessionalvirtualcommunityfrom2016to2019 AT hanjanetk womenincardiologytwitternetworkananalysisofaglobalprofessionalvirtualcommunityfrom2016to2019 |