Cargando…

Women in Cardiology Twitter Network: An Analysis of a Global Professional Virtual Community From 2016 to 2019

BACKGROUND: Social media is an effective channel for the advancement of women physicians; however, its use by women in cardiology has not been systematically studied. Our study seeks to characterize the current Women in Cardiology Twitter network. METHODS AND RESULTS: Six women‐specific cardiology T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chandra, Neha V., Hsiao, Ruth, Shapiro, Hilary, Snow, Sarah, Truong, Katie, Beach, Shire, Brown, Sherry‐Ann, Calfon Press, Marcella A., Gulati, Martha, Horwich, Tamara B., Lundberg, Gina P., Michos, Erin D., Parwani, Purvi, Thamman, Ritu, Watson, Karol E., Han, Janet K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8174265/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33619976
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.019321
_version_ 1783702870940450816
author Chandra, Neha V.
Hsiao, Ruth
Shapiro, Hilary
Snow, Sarah
Truong, Katie
Beach, Shire
Brown, Sherry‐Ann
Calfon Press, Marcella A.
Gulati, Martha
Horwich, Tamara B.
Lundberg, Gina P.
Michos, Erin D.
Parwani, Purvi
Thamman, Ritu
Watson, Karol E.
Han, Janet K.
author_facet Chandra, Neha V.
Hsiao, Ruth
Shapiro, Hilary
Snow, Sarah
Truong, Katie
Beach, Shire
Brown, Sherry‐Ann
Calfon Press, Marcella A.
Gulati, Martha
Horwich, Tamara B.
Lundberg, Gina P.
Michos, Erin D.
Parwani, Purvi
Thamman, Ritu
Watson, Karol E.
Han, Janet K.
author_sort Chandra, Neha V.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Social media is an effective channel for the advancement of women physicians; however, its use by women in cardiology has not been systematically studied. Our study seeks to characterize the current Women in Cardiology Twitter network. METHODS AND RESULTS: Six women‐specific cardiology Twitter hashtags were analyzed: #ACCWIC (American College of Cardiology Women in Cardiology), #AHAWIC (American Heart Association Women in Cardiology), #ilooklikeacardiologist, #SCAIWIN (Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Women in Innovations), #WomeninCardiology, and #WomeninEP (Women in Electrophysiology). Twitter data from 2016 to 2019 were obtained from Symplur Signals. Quantitative and descriptive content analyses were performed. The Women in Cardiology Twitter network generated 48 236 tweets, 266 180 903 impressions, and 12 485 users. Tweets increased by 706% (from 2083 to 16 780), impressions by 207% (from 26 755 476 to 82 080 472), and users by 440% (from 796 to 4300), including a 471% user increase internationally. The network generated 6530 (13%) original tweets and 43 103 (86%) amplification tweets. Most original and amplification tweets were authored by women (81% and 62%, respectively) and women physicians (76% and 52%, respectively), with an increase in original and amplification tweets authored by academic women physicians (98% and 109%, respectively) and trainees (390% and 249%, respectively) over time. Community building, professional development, and gender advocacy were the most common tweet contents over the study period. Community building was the most common tweet category for #ACCWIC, #AHAWIC, #ilooklikeacardiologist, #SCAIWIN, and #WomeninCardiology, whereas professional development was most common for #WomeninEP. CONCLUSIONS: The Women in Cardiology Twitter network has grown immensely from 2016 to 2019, with women physicians as the driving contributors. This network has become an important channel for community building, professional development, and gender advocacy discussions in an effort to advance women in cardiology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8174265
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81742652021-06-11 Women in Cardiology Twitter Network: An Analysis of a Global Professional Virtual Community From 2016 to 2019 Chandra, Neha V. Hsiao, Ruth Shapiro, Hilary Snow, Sarah Truong, Katie Beach, Shire Brown, Sherry‐Ann Calfon Press, Marcella A. Gulati, Martha Horwich, Tamara B. Lundberg, Gina P. Michos, Erin D. Parwani, Purvi Thamman, Ritu Watson, Karol E. Han, Janet K. J Am Heart Assoc Go Red for Women Spotlight BACKGROUND: Social media is an effective channel for the advancement of women physicians; however, its use by women in cardiology has not been systematically studied. Our study seeks to characterize the current Women in Cardiology Twitter network. METHODS AND RESULTS: Six women‐specific cardiology Twitter hashtags were analyzed: #ACCWIC (American College of Cardiology Women in Cardiology), #AHAWIC (American Heart Association Women in Cardiology), #ilooklikeacardiologist, #SCAIWIN (Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Women in Innovations), #WomeninCardiology, and #WomeninEP (Women in Electrophysiology). Twitter data from 2016 to 2019 were obtained from Symplur Signals. Quantitative and descriptive content analyses were performed. The Women in Cardiology Twitter network generated 48 236 tweets, 266 180 903 impressions, and 12 485 users. Tweets increased by 706% (from 2083 to 16 780), impressions by 207% (from 26 755 476 to 82 080 472), and users by 440% (from 796 to 4300), including a 471% user increase internationally. The network generated 6530 (13%) original tweets and 43 103 (86%) amplification tweets. Most original and amplification tweets were authored by women (81% and 62%, respectively) and women physicians (76% and 52%, respectively), with an increase in original and amplification tweets authored by academic women physicians (98% and 109%, respectively) and trainees (390% and 249%, respectively) over time. Community building, professional development, and gender advocacy were the most common tweet contents over the study period. Community building was the most common tweet category for #ACCWIC, #AHAWIC, #ilooklikeacardiologist, #SCAIWIN, and #WomeninCardiology, whereas professional development was most common for #WomeninEP. CONCLUSIONS: The Women in Cardiology Twitter network has grown immensely from 2016 to 2019, with women physicians as the driving contributors. This network has become an important channel for community building, professional development, and gender advocacy discussions in an effort to advance women in cardiology. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8174265/ /pubmed/33619976 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.019321 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Go Red for Women Spotlight
Chandra, Neha V.
Hsiao, Ruth
Shapiro, Hilary
Snow, Sarah
Truong, Katie
Beach, Shire
Brown, Sherry‐Ann
Calfon Press, Marcella A.
Gulati, Martha
Horwich, Tamara B.
Lundberg, Gina P.
Michos, Erin D.
Parwani, Purvi
Thamman, Ritu
Watson, Karol E.
Han, Janet K.
Women in Cardiology Twitter Network: An Analysis of a Global Professional Virtual Community From 2016 to 2019
title Women in Cardiology Twitter Network: An Analysis of a Global Professional Virtual Community From 2016 to 2019
title_full Women in Cardiology Twitter Network: An Analysis of a Global Professional Virtual Community From 2016 to 2019
title_fullStr Women in Cardiology Twitter Network: An Analysis of a Global Professional Virtual Community From 2016 to 2019
title_full_unstemmed Women in Cardiology Twitter Network: An Analysis of a Global Professional Virtual Community From 2016 to 2019
title_short Women in Cardiology Twitter Network: An Analysis of a Global Professional Virtual Community From 2016 to 2019
title_sort women in cardiology twitter network: an analysis of a global professional virtual community from 2016 to 2019
topic Go Red for Women Spotlight
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8174265/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33619976
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.019321
work_keys_str_mv AT chandranehav womenincardiologytwitternetworkananalysisofaglobalprofessionalvirtualcommunityfrom2016to2019
AT hsiaoruth womenincardiologytwitternetworkananalysisofaglobalprofessionalvirtualcommunityfrom2016to2019
AT shapirohilary womenincardiologytwitternetworkananalysisofaglobalprofessionalvirtualcommunityfrom2016to2019
AT snowsarah womenincardiologytwitternetworkananalysisofaglobalprofessionalvirtualcommunityfrom2016to2019
AT truongkatie womenincardiologytwitternetworkananalysisofaglobalprofessionalvirtualcommunityfrom2016to2019
AT beachshire womenincardiologytwitternetworkananalysisofaglobalprofessionalvirtualcommunityfrom2016to2019
AT brownsherryann womenincardiologytwitternetworkananalysisofaglobalprofessionalvirtualcommunityfrom2016to2019
AT calfonpressmarcellaa womenincardiologytwitternetworkananalysisofaglobalprofessionalvirtualcommunityfrom2016to2019
AT gulatimartha womenincardiologytwitternetworkananalysisofaglobalprofessionalvirtualcommunityfrom2016to2019
AT horwichtamarab womenincardiologytwitternetworkananalysisofaglobalprofessionalvirtualcommunityfrom2016to2019
AT lundbergginap womenincardiologytwitternetworkananalysisofaglobalprofessionalvirtualcommunityfrom2016to2019
AT michoserind womenincardiologytwitternetworkananalysisofaglobalprofessionalvirtualcommunityfrom2016to2019
AT parwanipurvi womenincardiologytwitternetworkananalysisofaglobalprofessionalvirtualcommunityfrom2016to2019
AT thammanritu womenincardiologytwitternetworkananalysisofaglobalprofessionalvirtualcommunityfrom2016to2019
AT watsonkarole womenincardiologytwitternetworkananalysisofaglobalprofessionalvirtualcommunityfrom2016to2019
AT hanjanetk womenincardiologytwitternetworkananalysisofaglobalprofessionalvirtualcommunityfrom2016to2019