Cargando…

Autonomic Alterations After Pulmonary Vein Isolation in the CIRCA‐DOSE (Cryoballoon vs Irrigated Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation) Study

BACKGROUND: The natural history of autonomic alterations following catheter ablation of drug‐refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation is poorly defined, largely because of the historical reliance on non‐invasive intermittent rhythm monitoring for outcome ascertainment. METHODS AND RESULTS: The stud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tang, Lisa Y. W., Hawkins, Nathaniel M., Ho, Kendall, Tam, Roger, Deyell, Marc W., Macle, Laurent, Verma, Atul, Khairy, Paul, Sheldon, Robert, Andrade, Jason G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8174287/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33634706
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.018610
_version_ 1783702876442329088
author Tang, Lisa Y. W.
Hawkins, Nathaniel M.
Ho, Kendall
Tam, Roger
Deyell, Marc W.
Macle, Laurent
Verma, Atul
Khairy, Paul
Sheldon, Robert
Andrade, Jason G.
author_facet Tang, Lisa Y. W.
Hawkins, Nathaniel M.
Ho, Kendall
Tam, Roger
Deyell, Marc W.
Macle, Laurent
Verma, Atul
Khairy, Paul
Sheldon, Robert
Andrade, Jason G.
author_sort Tang, Lisa Y. W.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The natural history of autonomic alterations following catheter ablation of drug‐refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation is poorly defined, largely because of the historical reliance on non‐invasive intermittent rhythm monitoring for outcome ascertainment. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study included 346 patients with drug‐refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation undergoing pulmonary vein isolation using contemporary advanced‐generation ablation technologies. All patients underwent insertion of a Reveal LINQ (Medtronic) implantable cardiac monitor before ablation. The implantable cardiac monitor continuously recorded physical activity, heart rate variability (measured as the SD of the average normal‐to‐normal), daytime heart rate, and nighttime heart rate. Longitudinal autonomic data in the 2‐month period leading up to the date of ablation were compared with the period from 91 to 365 days following ablation. Following ablation there was a significant decrease in SD of the average normal‐to‐normal (mean difference versus baseline of 19.3 ms; range, 12.9–25.7; P<0.0001), and significant increases in daytime and nighttime heart rates (mean difference versus baseline of 9.6 bpm; range, 7.4–11.8; P<0.0001, and 7.4 bpm; range, 5.4–9.3; P<0.0001, respectively). Patients free of arrhythmia recurrence had significantly faster daytime (11±11 versus 8±12 bpm, P=0.001) and nighttime heart rates (8±9 versus 6±8 bpm, P=0.049), but no difference in SD of the average normal‐to‐normal (P=0.09) compared with those with atrial fibrillation recurrence. Ablation technology and cryoablation duration did not influence these autonomic nervous system effects. CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary vein isolation results in significant sustained changes in the heart rate parameters related to autonomic function. These changes are correlated with procedural outcome and are independent of the ablation technology used. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01913522.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8174287
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81742872021-06-11 Autonomic Alterations After Pulmonary Vein Isolation in the CIRCA‐DOSE (Cryoballoon vs Irrigated Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation) Study Tang, Lisa Y. W. Hawkins, Nathaniel M. Ho, Kendall Tam, Roger Deyell, Marc W. Macle, Laurent Verma, Atul Khairy, Paul Sheldon, Robert Andrade, Jason G. J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: The natural history of autonomic alterations following catheter ablation of drug‐refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation is poorly defined, largely because of the historical reliance on non‐invasive intermittent rhythm monitoring for outcome ascertainment. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study included 346 patients with drug‐refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation undergoing pulmonary vein isolation using contemporary advanced‐generation ablation technologies. All patients underwent insertion of a Reveal LINQ (Medtronic) implantable cardiac monitor before ablation. The implantable cardiac monitor continuously recorded physical activity, heart rate variability (measured as the SD of the average normal‐to‐normal), daytime heart rate, and nighttime heart rate. Longitudinal autonomic data in the 2‐month period leading up to the date of ablation were compared with the period from 91 to 365 days following ablation. Following ablation there was a significant decrease in SD of the average normal‐to‐normal (mean difference versus baseline of 19.3 ms; range, 12.9–25.7; P<0.0001), and significant increases in daytime and nighttime heart rates (mean difference versus baseline of 9.6 bpm; range, 7.4–11.8; P<0.0001, and 7.4 bpm; range, 5.4–9.3; P<0.0001, respectively). Patients free of arrhythmia recurrence had significantly faster daytime (11±11 versus 8±12 bpm, P=0.001) and nighttime heart rates (8±9 versus 6±8 bpm, P=0.049), but no difference in SD of the average normal‐to‐normal (P=0.09) compared with those with atrial fibrillation recurrence. Ablation technology and cryoablation duration did not influence these autonomic nervous system effects. CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary vein isolation results in significant sustained changes in the heart rate parameters related to autonomic function. These changes are correlated with procedural outcome and are independent of the ablation technology used. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01913522. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8174287/ /pubmed/33634706 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.018610 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Tang, Lisa Y. W.
Hawkins, Nathaniel M.
Ho, Kendall
Tam, Roger
Deyell, Marc W.
Macle, Laurent
Verma, Atul
Khairy, Paul
Sheldon, Robert
Andrade, Jason G.
Autonomic Alterations After Pulmonary Vein Isolation in the CIRCA‐DOSE (Cryoballoon vs Irrigated Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation) Study
title Autonomic Alterations After Pulmonary Vein Isolation in the CIRCA‐DOSE (Cryoballoon vs Irrigated Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation) Study
title_full Autonomic Alterations After Pulmonary Vein Isolation in the CIRCA‐DOSE (Cryoballoon vs Irrigated Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation) Study
title_fullStr Autonomic Alterations After Pulmonary Vein Isolation in the CIRCA‐DOSE (Cryoballoon vs Irrigated Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation) Study
title_full_unstemmed Autonomic Alterations After Pulmonary Vein Isolation in the CIRCA‐DOSE (Cryoballoon vs Irrigated Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation) Study
title_short Autonomic Alterations After Pulmonary Vein Isolation in the CIRCA‐DOSE (Cryoballoon vs Irrigated Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation) Study
title_sort autonomic alterations after pulmonary vein isolation in the circa‐dose (cryoballoon vs irrigated radiofrequency catheter ablation) study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8174287/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33634706
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.018610
work_keys_str_mv AT tanglisayw autonomicalterationsafterpulmonaryveinisolationinthecircadosecryoballoonvsirrigatedradiofrequencycatheterablationstudy
AT hawkinsnathanielm autonomicalterationsafterpulmonaryveinisolationinthecircadosecryoballoonvsirrigatedradiofrequencycatheterablationstudy
AT hokendall autonomicalterationsafterpulmonaryveinisolationinthecircadosecryoballoonvsirrigatedradiofrequencycatheterablationstudy
AT tamroger autonomicalterationsafterpulmonaryveinisolationinthecircadosecryoballoonvsirrigatedradiofrequencycatheterablationstudy
AT deyellmarcw autonomicalterationsafterpulmonaryveinisolationinthecircadosecryoballoonvsirrigatedradiofrequencycatheterablationstudy
AT maclelaurent autonomicalterationsafterpulmonaryveinisolationinthecircadosecryoballoonvsirrigatedradiofrequencycatheterablationstudy
AT vermaatul autonomicalterationsafterpulmonaryveinisolationinthecircadosecryoballoonvsirrigatedradiofrequencycatheterablationstudy
AT khairypaul autonomicalterationsafterpulmonaryveinisolationinthecircadosecryoballoonvsirrigatedradiofrequencycatheterablationstudy
AT sheldonrobert autonomicalterationsafterpulmonaryveinisolationinthecircadosecryoballoonvsirrigatedradiofrequencycatheterablationstudy
AT andradejasong autonomicalterationsafterpulmonaryveinisolationinthecircadosecryoballoonvsirrigatedradiofrequencycatheterablationstudy
AT autonomicalterationsafterpulmonaryveinisolationinthecircadosecryoballoonvsirrigatedradiofrequencycatheterablationstudy