Cargando…

Creation and Validation of a Novel Sex‐Specific Mortality Risk Score in LVAD Recipients

BACKGROUND: Prior studies have shown that women have worse 3‐month survival after receiving a left ventricular assist device compared with men. Currently used prognostic scores, including the Heartmate II Risk Score, do not account for the increased residual risk in women. We used the IMACS (Interna...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nayak, Aditi, Hu, Yingtian, Ko, Yi‐An, Steinberg, Rebecca, Das, Subrat, Mehta, Anurag, Liu, Chang, Pennington, John, Xie, Rongbing, Kirklin, James K., Kormos, Robert L., Cowger, Jennifer, Simon, Marc A., Morris, Alanna A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8174331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33764158
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.020019
_version_ 1783702886741442560
author Nayak, Aditi
Hu, Yingtian
Ko, Yi‐An
Steinberg, Rebecca
Das, Subrat
Mehta, Anurag
Liu, Chang
Pennington, John
Xie, Rongbing
Kirklin, James K.
Kormos, Robert L.
Cowger, Jennifer
Simon, Marc A.
Morris, Alanna A.
author_facet Nayak, Aditi
Hu, Yingtian
Ko, Yi‐An
Steinberg, Rebecca
Das, Subrat
Mehta, Anurag
Liu, Chang
Pennington, John
Xie, Rongbing
Kirklin, James K.
Kormos, Robert L.
Cowger, Jennifer
Simon, Marc A.
Morris, Alanna A.
author_sort Nayak, Aditi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Prior studies have shown that women have worse 3‐month survival after receiving a left ventricular assist device compared with men. Currently used prognostic scores, including the Heartmate II Risk Score, do not account for the increased residual risk in women. We used the IMACS (International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support) registry to create and validate a sex‐specific risk score for early mortality in left ventricular assist device recipients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Adult patients with a continuous‐flow LVAD from the IMACS registry were randomly divided into a derivation cohort (DC; n=9113; 21% female) and a validation cohort (VC; n=6074; 21% female). The IMACS Risk Score was developed in the DC to predict 3‐month mortality, from preoperative candidate predictors selected using the Akaike information criterion, or significant sex × variable interaction. In the DC, age, cardiogenic shock at implantation, body mass index, blood urea nitrogen, bilirubin, hemoglobin, albumin, platelet count, left ventricular end‐diastolic diameter, tricuspid regurgitation, dialysis, and major infection before implantation were retained as significant predictors of 3‐month mortality. There was significant ischemic heart failure × sex and platelet count × sex interaction. For each quartile increase in IMACS risk score, men (odds ratio [OR], 1.86; 95% CI, 1.74–2.00; P<0.0001), and women (OR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.47–2.59; P<0.0001) had higher odds of 3‐month mortality. The IMACS risk score represented a significant improvement over Heartmate II Risk Score (IMACS risk score area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: men: DC, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.69–0.73; VC, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.66–0.72; women: DC, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.70–0.77; VC, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.66–0.76; P<0.01 for improvement in receiver operating characteristic) and provided excellent risk calibration in both sexes. Removal of sex‐specific interaction terms resulted in significant loss of model fit. CONCLUSIONS: A sex‐specific risk score provides excellent risk prediction in LVAD recipients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8174331
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81743312021-06-11 Creation and Validation of a Novel Sex‐Specific Mortality Risk Score in LVAD Recipients Nayak, Aditi Hu, Yingtian Ko, Yi‐An Steinberg, Rebecca Das, Subrat Mehta, Anurag Liu, Chang Pennington, John Xie, Rongbing Kirklin, James K. Kormos, Robert L. Cowger, Jennifer Simon, Marc A. Morris, Alanna A. J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Prior studies have shown that women have worse 3‐month survival after receiving a left ventricular assist device compared with men. Currently used prognostic scores, including the Heartmate II Risk Score, do not account for the increased residual risk in women. We used the IMACS (International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support) registry to create and validate a sex‐specific risk score for early mortality in left ventricular assist device recipients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Adult patients with a continuous‐flow LVAD from the IMACS registry were randomly divided into a derivation cohort (DC; n=9113; 21% female) and a validation cohort (VC; n=6074; 21% female). The IMACS Risk Score was developed in the DC to predict 3‐month mortality, from preoperative candidate predictors selected using the Akaike information criterion, or significant sex × variable interaction. In the DC, age, cardiogenic shock at implantation, body mass index, blood urea nitrogen, bilirubin, hemoglobin, albumin, platelet count, left ventricular end‐diastolic diameter, tricuspid regurgitation, dialysis, and major infection before implantation were retained as significant predictors of 3‐month mortality. There was significant ischemic heart failure × sex and platelet count × sex interaction. For each quartile increase in IMACS risk score, men (odds ratio [OR], 1.86; 95% CI, 1.74–2.00; P<0.0001), and women (OR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.47–2.59; P<0.0001) had higher odds of 3‐month mortality. The IMACS risk score represented a significant improvement over Heartmate II Risk Score (IMACS risk score area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: men: DC, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.69–0.73; VC, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.66–0.72; women: DC, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.70–0.77; VC, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.66–0.76; P<0.01 for improvement in receiver operating characteristic) and provided excellent risk calibration in both sexes. Removal of sex‐specific interaction terms resulted in significant loss of model fit. CONCLUSIONS: A sex‐specific risk score provides excellent risk prediction in LVAD recipients. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8174331/ /pubmed/33764158 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.020019 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Research
Nayak, Aditi
Hu, Yingtian
Ko, Yi‐An
Steinberg, Rebecca
Das, Subrat
Mehta, Anurag
Liu, Chang
Pennington, John
Xie, Rongbing
Kirklin, James K.
Kormos, Robert L.
Cowger, Jennifer
Simon, Marc A.
Morris, Alanna A.
Creation and Validation of a Novel Sex‐Specific Mortality Risk Score in LVAD Recipients
title Creation and Validation of a Novel Sex‐Specific Mortality Risk Score in LVAD Recipients
title_full Creation and Validation of a Novel Sex‐Specific Mortality Risk Score in LVAD Recipients
title_fullStr Creation and Validation of a Novel Sex‐Specific Mortality Risk Score in LVAD Recipients
title_full_unstemmed Creation and Validation of a Novel Sex‐Specific Mortality Risk Score in LVAD Recipients
title_short Creation and Validation of a Novel Sex‐Specific Mortality Risk Score in LVAD Recipients
title_sort creation and validation of a novel sex‐specific mortality risk score in lvad recipients
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8174331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33764158
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.020019
work_keys_str_mv AT nayakaditi creationandvalidationofanovelsexspecificmortalityriskscoreinlvadrecipients
AT huyingtian creationandvalidationofanovelsexspecificmortalityriskscoreinlvadrecipients
AT koyian creationandvalidationofanovelsexspecificmortalityriskscoreinlvadrecipients
AT steinbergrebecca creationandvalidationofanovelsexspecificmortalityriskscoreinlvadrecipients
AT dassubrat creationandvalidationofanovelsexspecificmortalityriskscoreinlvadrecipients
AT mehtaanurag creationandvalidationofanovelsexspecificmortalityriskscoreinlvadrecipients
AT liuchang creationandvalidationofanovelsexspecificmortalityriskscoreinlvadrecipients
AT penningtonjohn creationandvalidationofanovelsexspecificmortalityriskscoreinlvadrecipients
AT xierongbing creationandvalidationofanovelsexspecificmortalityriskscoreinlvadrecipients
AT kirklinjamesk creationandvalidationofanovelsexspecificmortalityriskscoreinlvadrecipients
AT kormosrobertl creationandvalidationofanovelsexspecificmortalityriskscoreinlvadrecipients
AT cowgerjennifer creationandvalidationofanovelsexspecificmortalityriskscoreinlvadrecipients
AT simonmarca creationandvalidationofanovelsexspecificmortalityriskscoreinlvadrecipients
AT morrisalannaa creationandvalidationofanovelsexspecificmortalityriskscoreinlvadrecipients