Cargando…

Prospective Validation and Comparative Analysis of Coronary Risk Stratification Strategies Among Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain

BACKGROUND: Coronary risk stratification is recommended for emergency department patients with chest pain. Many protocols are designed as “rule‐out” binary classification strategies, while others use graded‐risk stratification. The comparative performance of competing approaches at varying levels of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mark, Dustin G., Huang, Jie, Kene, Mamata V., Sax, Dana R., Cotton, Dale M., Lin, James S., Bouvet, Sean C., Chettipally, Uli K., Anderson, Megan L., McLachlan, Ian D., Simon, Laura E., Shan, Judy, Rauchwerger, Adina S., Vinson, David R., Ballard, Dustin W., Reed, Mary E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8174350/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33787290
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.020082
_version_ 1783702891498831872
author Mark, Dustin G.
Huang, Jie
Kene, Mamata V.
Sax, Dana R.
Cotton, Dale M.
Lin, James S.
Bouvet, Sean C.
Chettipally, Uli K.
Anderson, Megan L.
McLachlan, Ian D.
Simon, Laura E.
Shan, Judy
Rauchwerger, Adina S.
Vinson, David R.
Ballard, Dustin W.
Reed, Mary E.
author_facet Mark, Dustin G.
Huang, Jie
Kene, Mamata V.
Sax, Dana R.
Cotton, Dale M.
Lin, James S.
Bouvet, Sean C.
Chettipally, Uli K.
Anderson, Megan L.
McLachlan, Ian D.
Simon, Laura E.
Shan, Judy
Rauchwerger, Adina S.
Vinson, David R.
Ballard, Dustin W.
Reed, Mary E.
author_sort Mark, Dustin G.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Coronary risk stratification is recommended for emergency department patients with chest pain. Many protocols are designed as “rule‐out” binary classification strategies, while others use graded‐risk stratification. The comparative performance of competing approaches at varying levels of risk tolerance has not been widely reported. METHODS AND RESULTS: This is a prospective cohort study of adult patients with chest pain presenting between January 2018 and December 2019 to 13 medical center emergency departments within an integrated healthcare delivery system. Using an electronic clinical decision support interface, we externally validated and assessed the net benefit (at varying risk thresholds) of several coronary risk scores (History, ECG, Age, Risk Factors, and Troponin [HEART] score, HEART pathway, Emergency Department Assessment of Chest Pain Score Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol), troponin‐only strategies (fourth‐generation assay), unstructured physician gestalt, and a novel risk algorithm (RISTRA‐ACS). The primary outcome was 60‐day major adverse cardiac event defined as myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, cardiogenic shock, coronary revascularization, or all‐cause mortality. There were 13 192 patient encounters included with a 60‐day major adverse cardiac event incidence of 3.7%. RISTRA‐ACS and HEART pathway had the lowest negative likelihood ratios (0.06, 95% CI, 0.03–0.10 and 0.07, 95% CI, 0.04–0.11, respectively) and the greatest net benefit across a range of low‐risk thresholds. RISTRA‐ACS demonstrated the highest discrimination for 60‐day major adverse cardiac event (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.92, 95% CI, 0.91–0.94, P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: RISTRA‐ACS and HEART pathway were the optimal rule‐out approaches, while RISTRA‐ACS was the best‐performing graded‐risk approach. RISTRA‐ACS offers promise as a versatile single approach to emergency department coronary risk stratification. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03286179.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8174350
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81743502021-06-11 Prospective Validation and Comparative Analysis of Coronary Risk Stratification Strategies Among Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain Mark, Dustin G. Huang, Jie Kene, Mamata V. Sax, Dana R. Cotton, Dale M. Lin, James S. Bouvet, Sean C. Chettipally, Uli K. Anderson, Megan L. McLachlan, Ian D. Simon, Laura E. Shan, Judy Rauchwerger, Adina S. Vinson, David R. Ballard, Dustin W. Reed, Mary E. J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Coronary risk stratification is recommended for emergency department patients with chest pain. Many protocols are designed as “rule‐out” binary classification strategies, while others use graded‐risk stratification. The comparative performance of competing approaches at varying levels of risk tolerance has not been widely reported. METHODS AND RESULTS: This is a prospective cohort study of adult patients with chest pain presenting between January 2018 and December 2019 to 13 medical center emergency departments within an integrated healthcare delivery system. Using an electronic clinical decision support interface, we externally validated and assessed the net benefit (at varying risk thresholds) of several coronary risk scores (History, ECG, Age, Risk Factors, and Troponin [HEART] score, HEART pathway, Emergency Department Assessment of Chest Pain Score Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol), troponin‐only strategies (fourth‐generation assay), unstructured physician gestalt, and a novel risk algorithm (RISTRA‐ACS). The primary outcome was 60‐day major adverse cardiac event defined as myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, cardiogenic shock, coronary revascularization, or all‐cause mortality. There were 13 192 patient encounters included with a 60‐day major adverse cardiac event incidence of 3.7%. RISTRA‐ACS and HEART pathway had the lowest negative likelihood ratios (0.06, 95% CI, 0.03–0.10 and 0.07, 95% CI, 0.04–0.11, respectively) and the greatest net benefit across a range of low‐risk thresholds. RISTRA‐ACS demonstrated the highest discrimination for 60‐day major adverse cardiac event (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.92, 95% CI, 0.91–0.94, P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: RISTRA‐ACS and HEART pathway were the optimal rule‐out approaches, while RISTRA‐ACS was the best‐performing graded‐risk approach. RISTRA‐ACS offers promise as a versatile single approach to emergency department coronary risk stratification. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03286179. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8174350/ /pubmed/33787290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.020082 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Research
Mark, Dustin G.
Huang, Jie
Kene, Mamata V.
Sax, Dana R.
Cotton, Dale M.
Lin, James S.
Bouvet, Sean C.
Chettipally, Uli K.
Anderson, Megan L.
McLachlan, Ian D.
Simon, Laura E.
Shan, Judy
Rauchwerger, Adina S.
Vinson, David R.
Ballard, Dustin W.
Reed, Mary E.
Prospective Validation and Comparative Analysis of Coronary Risk Stratification Strategies Among Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain
title Prospective Validation and Comparative Analysis of Coronary Risk Stratification Strategies Among Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain
title_full Prospective Validation and Comparative Analysis of Coronary Risk Stratification Strategies Among Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain
title_fullStr Prospective Validation and Comparative Analysis of Coronary Risk Stratification Strategies Among Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain
title_full_unstemmed Prospective Validation and Comparative Analysis of Coronary Risk Stratification Strategies Among Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain
title_short Prospective Validation and Comparative Analysis of Coronary Risk Stratification Strategies Among Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain
title_sort prospective validation and comparative analysis of coronary risk stratification strategies among emergency department patients with chest pain
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8174350/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33787290
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.020082
work_keys_str_mv AT markdusting prospectivevalidationandcomparativeanalysisofcoronaryriskstratificationstrategiesamongemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpain
AT huangjie prospectivevalidationandcomparativeanalysisofcoronaryriskstratificationstrategiesamongemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpain
AT kenemamatav prospectivevalidationandcomparativeanalysisofcoronaryriskstratificationstrategiesamongemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpain
AT saxdanar prospectivevalidationandcomparativeanalysisofcoronaryriskstratificationstrategiesamongemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpain
AT cottondalem prospectivevalidationandcomparativeanalysisofcoronaryriskstratificationstrategiesamongemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpain
AT linjamess prospectivevalidationandcomparativeanalysisofcoronaryriskstratificationstrategiesamongemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpain
AT bouvetseanc prospectivevalidationandcomparativeanalysisofcoronaryriskstratificationstrategiesamongemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpain
AT chettipallyulik prospectivevalidationandcomparativeanalysisofcoronaryriskstratificationstrategiesamongemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpain
AT andersonmeganl prospectivevalidationandcomparativeanalysisofcoronaryriskstratificationstrategiesamongemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpain
AT mclachlaniand prospectivevalidationandcomparativeanalysisofcoronaryriskstratificationstrategiesamongemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpain
AT simonlaurae prospectivevalidationandcomparativeanalysisofcoronaryriskstratificationstrategiesamongemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpain
AT shanjudy prospectivevalidationandcomparativeanalysisofcoronaryriskstratificationstrategiesamongemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpain
AT rauchwergeradinas prospectivevalidationandcomparativeanalysisofcoronaryriskstratificationstrategiesamongemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpain
AT vinsondavidr prospectivevalidationandcomparativeanalysisofcoronaryriskstratificationstrategiesamongemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpain
AT ballarddustinw prospectivevalidationandcomparativeanalysisofcoronaryriskstratificationstrategiesamongemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpain
AT reedmarye prospectivevalidationandcomparativeanalysisofcoronaryriskstratificationstrategiesamongemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpain
AT prospectivevalidationandcomparativeanalysisofcoronaryriskstratificationstrategiesamongemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpain