Cargando…
Prospective Validation and Comparative Analysis of Coronary Risk Stratification Strategies Among Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain
BACKGROUND: Coronary risk stratification is recommended for emergency department patients with chest pain. Many protocols are designed as “rule‐out” binary classification strategies, while others use graded‐risk stratification. The comparative performance of competing approaches at varying levels of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8174350/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33787290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.020082 |
_version_ | 1783702891498831872 |
---|---|
author | Mark, Dustin G. Huang, Jie Kene, Mamata V. Sax, Dana R. Cotton, Dale M. Lin, James S. Bouvet, Sean C. Chettipally, Uli K. Anderson, Megan L. McLachlan, Ian D. Simon, Laura E. Shan, Judy Rauchwerger, Adina S. Vinson, David R. Ballard, Dustin W. Reed, Mary E. |
author_facet | Mark, Dustin G. Huang, Jie Kene, Mamata V. Sax, Dana R. Cotton, Dale M. Lin, James S. Bouvet, Sean C. Chettipally, Uli K. Anderson, Megan L. McLachlan, Ian D. Simon, Laura E. Shan, Judy Rauchwerger, Adina S. Vinson, David R. Ballard, Dustin W. Reed, Mary E. |
author_sort | Mark, Dustin G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Coronary risk stratification is recommended for emergency department patients with chest pain. Many protocols are designed as “rule‐out” binary classification strategies, while others use graded‐risk stratification. The comparative performance of competing approaches at varying levels of risk tolerance has not been widely reported. METHODS AND RESULTS: This is a prospective cohort study of adult patients with chest pain presenting between January 2018 and December 2019 to 13 medical center emergency departments within an integrated healthcare delivery system. Using an electronic clinical decision support interface, we externally validated and assessed the net benefit (at varying risk thresholds) of several coronary risk scores (History, ECG, Age, Risk Factors, and Troponin [HEART] score, HEART pathway, Emergency Department Assessment of Chest Pain Score Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol), troponin‐only strategies (fourth‐generation assay), unstructured physician gestalt, and a novel risk algorithm (RISTRA‐ACS). The primary outcome was 60‐day major adverse cardiac event defined as myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, cardiogenic shock, coronary revascularization, or all‐cause mortality. There were 13 192 patient encounters included with a 60‐day major adverse cardiac event incidence of 3.7%. RISTRA‐ACS and HEART pathway had the lowest negative likelihood ratios (0.06, 95% CI, 0.03–0.10 and 0.07, 95% CI, 0.04–0.11, respectively) and the greatest net benefit across a range of low‐risk thresholds. RISTRA‐ACS demonstrated the highest discrimination for 60‐day major adverse cardiac event (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.92, 95% CI, 0.91–0.94, P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: RISTRA‐ACS and HEART pathway were the optimal rule‐out approaches, while RISTRA‐ACS was the best‐performing graded‐risk approach. RISTRA‐ACS offers promise as a versatile single approach to emergency department coronary risk stratification. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03286179. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8174350 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81743502021-06-11 Prospective Validation and Comparative Analysis of Coronary Risk Stratification Strategies Among Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain Mark, Dustin G. Huang, Jie Kene, Mamata V. Sax, Dana R. Cotton, Dale M. Lin, James S. Bouvet, Sean C. Chettipally, Uli K. Anderson, Megan L. McLachlan, Ian D. Simon, Laura E. Shan, Judy Rauchwerger, Adina S. Vinson, David R. Ballard, Dustin W. Reed, Mary E. J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Coronary risk stratification is recommended for emergency department patients with chest pain. Many protocols are designed as “rule‐out” binary classification strategies, while others use graded‐risk stratification. The comparative performance of competing approaches at varying levels of risk tolerance has not been widely reported. METHODS AND RESULTS: This is a prospective cohort study of adult patients with chest pain presenting between January 2018 and December 2019 to 13 medical center emergency departments within an integrated healthcare delivery system. Using an electronic clinical decision support interface, we externally validated and assessed the net benefit (at varying risk thresholds) of several coronary risk scores (History, ECG, Age, Risk Factors, and Troponin [HEART] score, HEART pathway, Emergency Department Assessment of Chest Pain Score Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol), troponin‐only strategies (fourth‐generation assay), unstructured physician gestalt, and a novel risk algorithm (RISTRA‐ACS). The primary outcome was 60‐day major adverse cardiac event defined as myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, cardiogenic shock, coronary revascularization, or all‐cause mortality. There were 13 192 patient encounters included with a 60‐day major adverse cardiac event incidence of 3.7%. RISTRA‐ACS and HEART pathway had the lowest negative likelihood ratios (0.06, 95% CI, 0.03–0.10 and 0.07, 95% CI, 0.04–0.11, respectively) and the greatest net benefit across a range of low‐risk thresholds. RISTRA‐ACS demonstrated the highest discrimination for 60‐day major adverse cardiac event (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.92, 95% CI, 0.91–0.94, P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: RISTRA‐ACS and HEART pathway were the optimal rule‐out approaches, while RISTRA‐ACS was the best‐performing graded‐risk approach. RISTRA‐ACS offers promise as a versatile single approach to emergency department coronary risk stratification. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03286179. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8174350/ /pubmed/33787290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.020082 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Mark, Dustin G. Huang, Jie Kene, Mamata V. Sax, Dana R. Cotton, Dale M. Lin, James S. Bouvet, Sean C. Chettipally, Uli K. Anderson, Megan L. McLachlan, Ian D. Simon, Laura E. Shan, Judy Rauchwerger, Adina S. Vinson, David R. Ballard, Dustin W. Reed, Mary E. Prospective Validation and Comparative Analysis of Coronary Risk Stratification Strategies Among Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain |
title | Prospective Validation and Comparative Analysis of Coronary Risk Stratification Strategies Among Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain |
title_full | Prospective Validation and Comparative Analysis of Coronary Risk Stratification Strategies Among Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain |
title_fullStr | Prospective Validation and Comparative Analysis of Coronary Risk Stratification Strategies Among Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain |
title_full_unstemmed | Prospective Validation and Comparative Analysis of Coronary Risk Stratification Strategies Among Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain |
title_short | Prospective Validation and Comparative Analysis of Coronary Risk Stratification Strategies Among Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain |
title_sort | prospective validation and comparative analysis of coronary risk stratification strategies among emergency department patients with chest pain |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8174350/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33787290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.020082 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT markdusting prospectivevalidationandcomparativeanalysisofcoronaryriskstratificationstrategiesamongemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpain AT huangjie prospectivevalidationandcomparativeanalysisofcoronaryriskstratificationstrategiesamongemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpain AT kenemamatav prospectivevalidationandcomparativeanalysisofcoronaryriskstratificationstrategiesamongemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpain AT saxdanar prospectivevalidationandcomparativeanalysisofcoronaryriskstratificationstrategiesamongemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpain AT cottondalem prospectivevalidationandcomparativeanalysisofcoronaryriskstratificationstrategiesamongemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpain AT linjamess prospectivevalidationandcomparativeanalysisofcoronaryriskstratificationstrategiesamongemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpain AT bouvetseanc prospectivevalidationandcomparativeanalysisofcoronaryriskstratificationstrategiesamongemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpain AT chettipallyulik prospectivevalidationandcomparativeanalysisofcoronaryriskstratificationstrategiesamongemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpain AT andersonmeganl prospectivevalidationandcomparativeanalysisofcoronaryriskstratificationstrategiesamongemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpain AT mclachlaniand prospectivevalidationandcomparativeanalysisofcoronaryriskstratificationstrategiesamongemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpain AT simonlaurae prospectivevalidationandcomparativeanalysisofcoronaryriskstratificationstrategiesamongemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpain AT shanjudy prospectivevalidationandcomparativeanalysisofcoronaryriskstratificationstrategiesamongemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpain AT rauchwergeradinas prospectivevalidationandcomparativeanalysisofcoronaryriskstratificationstrategiesamongemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpain AT vinsondavidr prospectivevalidationandcomparativeanalysisofcoronaryriskstratificationstrategiesamongemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpain AT ballarddustinw prospectivevalidationandcomparativeanalysisofcoronaryriskstratificationstrategiesamongemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpain AT reedmarye prospectivevalidationandcomparativeanalysisofcoronaryriskstratificationstrategiesamongemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpain AT prospectivevalidationandcomparativeanalysisofcoronaryriskstratificationstrategiesamongemergencydepartmentpatientswithchestpain |