Cargando…

Airway management using LMA-evaluation of three insertional techniques-a prospective randomised study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Laryngeal Mask Airway [LMA] insertion has become as a basic procedural skill needed for all health care providers. Search for the most successful insertion technique continues. We evaluated the success rate of the three LMA insertion techniques- standard, 90 degree rotational an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shyam, T., Selvaraj, Venkatesh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8174429/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34103833
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joacp.JOACP_60_19
_version_ 1783702908883173376
author Shyam, T.
Selvaraj, Venkatesh
author_facet Shyam, T.
Selvaraj, Venkatesh
author_sort Shyam, T.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Laryngeal Mask Airway [LMA] insertion has become as a basic procedural skill needed for all health care providers. Search for the most successful insertion technique continues. We evaluated the success rate of the three LMA insertion techniques- standard, 90 degree rotational and 180 degree rotational technique. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 180 patients of ASA I-II aged 18-65 years undergoing open superficial surgical procedures with (LMA® Unique™ Airway, Teleflex®, Teleflex Medical Europe Ltd, Ireland) as an airway management device and with neuromuscular blocking agents, were randomly allocated to three groups, in this prospective randomized study. In the standard technique group (n = 60), the LMA was inserted by standard digital intraoral method. In the 90 degree rotational technique group (n = 60), the LMA was rotated counter-clockwise through 90 degree in the mouth and advanced until the resistance of the hypopharynx was felt, and then straightened out in the hypopharynx. In 180 degree rotational technique, LMA was inserted back-to-front, like a Guedel airway. The parameters studied were: the LMA placement success at first attempt, insertion time, need for more than one attempt at insertion, need for external airway manipulations, postoperative sore throat, blood staining and other post-operative (airway related) complications. RESULTS: The first attempt success rate in the standard technique was 83.9%, in 90 degree rotational technique was 75% and 180 degree rotational was 93.5%. The first attempt success rate was higher in 180 degree rotational group compared to 90 degree rotational group (P < 0.05), but there was no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05) between 90 degree rotational group and the standard technique group. There was no statistically significant difference among the two groups in terms of the secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: We conclude that 180 degree rotational technique of LMA insertion is more successful than 90 degree rotational technique in adult patients under general anaesthesia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8174429
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81744292021-06-07 Airway management using LMA-evaluation of three insertional techniques-a prospective randomised study Shyam, T. Selvaraj, Venkatesh J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Laryngeal Mask Airway [LMA] insertion has become as a basic procedural skill needed for all health care providers. Search for the most successful insertion technique continues. We evaluated the success rate of the three LMA insertion techniques- standard, 90 degree rotational and 180 degree rotational technique. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 180 patients of ASA I-II aged 18-65 years undergoing open superficial surgical procedures with (LMA® Unique™ Airway, Teleflex®, Teleflex Medical Europe Ltd, Ireland) as an airway management device and with neuromuscular blocking agents, were randomly allocated to three groups, in this prospective randomized study. In the standard technique group (n = 60), the LMA was inserted by standard digital intraoral method. In the 90 degree rotational technique group (n = 60), the LMA was rotated counter-clockwise through 90 degree in the mouth and advanced until the resistance of the hypopharynx was felt, and then straightened out in the hypopharynx. In 180 degree rotational technique, LMA was inserted back-to-front, like a Guedel airway. The parameters studied were: the LMA placement success at first attempt, insertion time, need for more than one attempt at insertion, need for external airway manipulations, postoperative sore throat, blood staining and other post-operative (airway related) complications. RESULTS: The first attempt success rate in the standard technique was 83.9%, in 90 degree rotational technique was 75% and 180 degree rotational was 93.5%. The first attempt success rate was higher in 180 degree rotational group compared to 90 degree rotational group (P < 0.05), but there was no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05) between 90 degree rotational group and the standard technique group. There was no statistically significant difference among the two groups in terms of the secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: We conclude that 180 degree rotational technique of LMA insertion is more successful than 90 degree rotational technique in adult patients under general anaesthesia. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021 2021-04-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8174429/ /pubmed/34103833 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joacp.JOACP_60_19 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Shyam, T.
Selvaraj, Venkatesh
Airway management using LMA-evaluation of three insertional techniques-a prospective randomised study
title Airway management using LMA-evaluation of three insertional techniques-a prospective randomised study
title_full Airway management using LMA-evaluation of three insertional techniques-a prospective randomised study
title_fullStr Airway management using LMA-evaluation of three insertional techniques-a prospective randomised study
title_full_unstemmed Airway management using LMA-evaluation of three insertional techniques-a prospective randomised study
title_short Airway management using LMA-evaluation of three insertional techniques-a prospective randomised study
title_sort airway management using lma-evaluation of three insertional techniques-a prospective randomised study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8174429/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34103833
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joacp.JOACP_60_19
work_keys_str_mv AT shyamt airwaymanagementusinglmaevaluationofthreeinsertionaltechniquesaprospectiverandomisedstudy
AT selvarajvenkatesh airwaymanagementusinglmaevaluationofthreeinsertionaltechniquesaprospectiverandomisedstudy