Cargando…
The role of ethics in science: a systematic literature review from the first wave of COVID-19
This paper proposes a systematic literature review on ethics and CoviD-19, aiming to understand the impact and the perception of the pandemic during the first wave (January-June 2020) and the consequences one year later. PubMed was systematically searched up May 2020 to identify studies that took in...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8175060/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34104626 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12553-021-00570-6 |
_version_ | 1783702981154177024 |
---|---|
author | Maccaro, Alessia Piaggio, Davide Pagliara, Silvio Pecchia, Leandro |
author_facet | Maccaro, Alessia Piaggio, Davide Pagliara, Silvio Pecchia, Leandro |
author_sort | Maccaro, Alessia |
collection | PubMed |
description | This paper proposes a systematic literature review on ethics and CoviD-19, aiming to understand the impact and the perception of the pandemic during the first wave (January-June 2020) and the consequences one year later. PubMed was systematically searched up May 2020 to identify studies that took into consideration various ethical issues that have been arising from the Covid-19 outbreak. The eligibility of the papers was determined by two authors, who screened the results mediated by a third author. In order to facilitate the screening, the titles were divided into five sub-thematic macro-areas, namely allocation, policy, specialist, clinical trials, and technology and, when possible, per geographical area. Specifically, a posteriori, we decided to focus on the papers referring to policies and technology, as they highlighted ethical issues that are not overused and worthy of particular attention. Thus, 38 studies out of 233 met our inclusion criteria and were fully analysed. Accordingly, this review touches on themes such as fairness, equity, transparency of information, the duty of care, racial disparities, the marginalisation of the poor, and privacy and ethical concerns. Overall, it was found that despite the increased awareness of interdisciplinarity and the essential reference to ethics, many scientific articles use it with little competence, considering it only a "humanitarian" enrichment. In fact, as we understand, reflecting a year after the outbreak of the pandemic, although Covid-19 is leading scientists to increasingly recognise the importance of ethical issues, there is still a lot of confusion that could be helped by establishing international guidelines to act as a moral compass in times of crisis. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12553-021-00570-6. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8175060 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81750602021-06-04 The role of ethics in science: a systematic literature review from the first wave of COVID-19 Maccaro, Alessia Piaggio, Davide Pagliara, Silvio Pecchia, Leandro Health Technol (Berl) Review Paper This paper proposes a systematic literature review on ethics and CoviD-19, aiming to understand the impact and the perception of the pandemic during the first wave (January-June 2020) and the consequences one year later. PubMed was systematically searched up May 2020 to identify studies that took into consideration various ethical issues that have been arising from the Covid-19 outbreak. The eligibility of the papers was determined by two authors, who screened the results mediated by a third author. In order to facilitate the screening, the titles were divided into five sub-thematic macro-areas, namely allocation, policy, specialist, clinical trials, and technology and, when possible, per geographical area. Specifically, a posteriori, we decided to focus on the papers referring to policies and technology, as they highlighted ethical issues that are not overused and worthy of particular attention. Thus, 38 studies out of 233 met our inclusion criteria and were fully analysed. Accordingly, this review touches on themes such as fairness, equity, transparency of information, the duty of care, racial disparities, the marginalisation of the poor, and privacy and ethical concerns. Overall, it was found that despite the increased awareness of interdisciplinarity and the essential reference to ethics, many scientific articles use it with little competence, considering it only a "humanitarian" enrichment. In fact, as we understand, reflecting a year after the outbreak of the pandemic, although Covid-19 is leading scientists to increasingly recognise the importance of ethical issues, there is still a lot of confusion that could be helped by establishing international guidelines to act as a moral compass in times of crisis. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12553-021-00570-6. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-06-03 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8175060/ /pubmed/34104626 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12553-021-00570-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Paper Maccaro, Alessia Piaggio, Davide Pagliara, Silvio Pecchia, Leandro The role of ethics in science: a systematic literature review from the first wave of COVID-19 |
title | The role of ethics in science: a systematic literature review from the first wave of COVID-19 |
title_full | The role of ethics in science: a systematic literature review from the first wave of COVID-19 |
title_fullStr | The role of ethics in science: a systematic literature review from the first wave of COVID-19 |
title_full_unstemmed | The role of ethics in science: a systematic literature review from the first wave of COVID-19 |
title_short | The role of ethics in science: a systematic literature review from the first wave of COVID-19 |
title_sort | role of ethics in science: a systematic literature review from the first wave of covid-19 |
topic | Review Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8175060/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34104626 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12553-021-00570-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maccaroalessia theroleofethicsinscienceasystematicliteraturereviewfromthefirstwaveofcovid19 AT piaggiodavide theroleofethicsinscienceasystematicliteraturereviewfromthefirstwaveofcovid19 AT pagliarasilvio theroleofethicsinscienceasystematicliteraturereviewfromthefirstwaveofcovid19 AT pecchialeandro theroleofethicsinscienceasystematicliteraturereviewfromthefirstwaveofcovid19 AT maccaroalessia roleofethicsinscienceasystematicliteraturereviewfromthefirstwaveofcovid19 AT piaggiodavide roleofethicsinscienceasystematicliteraturereviewfromthefirstwaveofcovid19 AT pagliarasilvio roleofethicsinscienceasystematicliteraturereviewfromthefirstwaveofcovid19 AT pecchialeandro roleofethicsinscienceasystematicliteraturereviewfromthefirstwaveofcovid19 |