Cargando…

The role of ethics in science: a systematic literature review from the first wave of COVID-19

This paper proposes a systematic literature review on ethics and CoviD-19, aiming to understand the impact and the perception of the pandemic during the first wave (January-June 2020) and the consequences one year later. PubMed was systematically searched up May 2020 to identify studies that took in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maccaro, Alessia, Piaggio, Davide, Pagliara, Silvio, Pecchia, Leandro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8175060/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34104626
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12553-021-00570-6
_version_ 1783702981154177024
author Maccaro, Alessia
Piaggio, Davide
Pagliara, Silvio
Pecchia, Leandro
author_facet Maccaro, Alessia
Piaggio, Davide
Pagliara, Silvio
Pecchia, Leandro
author_sort Maccaro, Alessia
collection PubMed
description This paper proposes a systematic literature review on ethics and CoviD-19, aiming to understand the impact and the perception of the pandemic during the first wave (January-June 2020) and the consequences one year later. PubMed was systematically searched up May 2020 to identify studies that took into consideration various ethical issues that have been arising from the Covid-19 outbreak. The eligibility of the papers was determined by two authors, who screened the results mediated by a third author. In order to facilitate the screening, the titles were divided into five sub-thematic macro-areas, namely allocation, policy, specialist, clinical trials, and technology and, when possible, per geographical area. Specifically, a posteriori, we decided to focus on the papers referring to policies and technology, as they highlighted ethical issues that are not overused and worthy of particular attention. Thus, 38 studies out of 233 met our inclusion criteria and were fully analysed. Accordingly, this review touches on themes such as fairness, equity, transparency of information, the duty of care, racial disparities, the marginalisation of the poor, and privacy and ethical concerns. Overall, it was found that despite the increased awareness of interdisciplinarity and the essential reference to ethics, many scientific articles use it with little competence, considering it only a "humanitarian" enrichment. In fact, as we understand, reflecting a year after the outbreak of the pandemic, although Covid-19 is leading scientists to increasingly recognise the importance of ethical issues, there is still a lot of confusion that could be helped by establishing international guidelines to act as a moral compass in times of crisis. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12553-021-00570-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8175060
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81750602021-06-04 The role of ethics in science: a systematic literature review from the first wave of COVID-19 Maccaro, Alessia Piaggio, Davide Pagliara, Silvio Pecchia, Leandro Health Technol (Berl) Review Paper This paper proposes a systematic literature review on ethics and CoviD-19, aiming to understand the impact and the perception of the pandemic during the first wave (January-June 2020) and the consequences one year later. PubMed was systematically searched up May 2020 to identify studies that took into consideration various ethical issues that have been arising from the Covid-19 outbreak. The eligibility of the papers was determined by two authors, who screened the results mediated by a third author. In order to facilitate the screening, the titles were divided into five sub-thematic macro-areas, namely allocation, policy, specialist, clinical trials, and technology and, when possible, per geographical area. Specifically, a posteriori, we decided to focus on the papers referring to policies and technology, as they highlighted ethical issues that are not overused and worthy of particular attention. Thus, 38 studies out of 233 met our inclusion criteria and were fully analysed. Accordingly, this review touches on themes such as fairness, equity, transparency of information, the duty of care, racial disparities, the marginalisation of the poor, and privacy and ethical concerns. Overall, it was found that despite the increased awareness of interdisciplinarity and the essential reference to ethics, many scientific articles use it with little competence, considering it only a "humanitarian" enrichment. In fact, as we understand, reflecting a year after the outbreak of the pandemic, although Covid-19 is leading scientists to increasingly recognise the importance of ethical issues, there is still a lot of confusion that could be helped by establishing international guidelines to act as a moral compass in times of crisis. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12553-021-00570-6. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-06-03 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8175060/ /pubmed/34104626 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12553-021-00570-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Paper
Maccaro, Alessia
Piaggio, Davide
Pagliara, Silvio
Pecchia, Leandro
The role of ethics in science: a systematic literature review from the first wave of COVID-19
title The role of ethics in science: a systematic literature review from the first wave of COVID-19
title_full The role of ethics in science: a systematic literature review from the first wave of COVID-19
title_fullStr The role of ethics in science: a systematic literature review from the first wave of COVID-19
title_full_unstemmed The role of ethics in science: a systematic literature review from the first wave of COVID-19
title_short The role of ethics in science: a systematic literature review from the first wave of COVID-19
title_sort role of ethics in science: a systematic literature review from the first wave of covid-19
topic Review Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8175060/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34104626
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12553-021-00570-6
work_keys_str_mv AT maccaroalessia theroleofethicsinscienceasystematicliteraturereviewfromthefirstwaveofcovid19
AT piaggiodavide theroleofethicsinscienceasystematicliteraturereviewfromthefirstwaveofcovid19
AT pagliarasilvio theroleofethicsinscienceasystematicliteraturereviewfromthefirstwaveofcovid19
AT pecchialeandro theroleofethicsinscienceasystematicliteraturereviewfromthefirstwaveofcovid19
AT maccaroalessia roleofethicsinscienceasystematicliteraturereviewfromthefirstwaveofcovid19
AT piaggiodavide roleofethicsinscienceasystematicliteraturereviewfromthefirstwaveofcovid19
AT pagliarasilvio roleofethicsinscienceasystematicliteraturereviewfromthefirstwaveofcovid19
AT pecchialeandro roleofethicsinscienceasystematicliteraturereviewfromthefirstwaveofcovid19