Cargando…

Young athletes: Preventing sudden death by adopting a modern screening approach? A critical review and the opening of a debate

Preventing sudden cardiac death (SCD) in athletes is a primary duty of sports cardiologists. Current recommendations for detecting high-risk cardiovascular conditions (hr-CVCs) are history and physical examination (H&P)-based. We discuss the effectiveness of H&P-based screening versus more-m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Angelini, Paolo, Muthupillai, Raja, Lopez, Alberto, Cheong, Benjamin, Uribe, Carlo, Hernandez, Eduardo, Coulter, Stephanie, Perin, Emerson, Molossi, Silvana, Gentile, Federico, Flamm, Scott, Lorenz, Giovanni, D'Ascenzi, Flavio, Tobis, Jonathan, Sarnari, Roberto, Corno, Antonio, Furgerson, James, Chiribiri, Amedeo, Villa, Adriana D.M., Orzan, Fulvio, Brugada, Pedro, Jefferies, John, Aubry, Pierre, Towbin, Jeffrey, Thiene, Gaetano, Tomanek, Robert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8175289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34124338
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2021.100790
Descripción
Sumario:Preventing sudden cardiac death (SCD) in athletes is a primary duty of sports cardiologists. Current recommendations for detecting high-risk cardiovascular conditions (hr-CVCs) are history and physical examination (H&P)-based. We discuss the effectiveness of H&P-based screening versus more-modern and accurate methods. In this position paper, we review current authoritative statements and suggest a novel alternative: screening MRI (s-MRI), supported by evidence from a preliminary population-based study (completed in 2018), and a prospective, controlled study in military recruits (in development). We present: 1. Literature-Based Comparisons (for diagnosing hr-CVCs): Two recent studies using traditional methods to identify hr-CVCs in >3,000 young athletes are compared with our s-MRI-based study of 5,169 adolescents. 2. Critical Review of Previous Results: The reported incidence of SCD in athletes is presently based on retrospective, observational, and incomplete studies. H&P’s screening value seems minimal for structural heart disease, versus echocardiography (which improves diagnosis for high-risk cardiomyopathies) and s-MRI (which also identifies high-risk coronary artery anomalies). Electrocardiography is valuable in screening for potentially high-risk electrophysiological anomalies. 3. Proposed Project: We propose a prospective, controlled study (2 comparable large cohorts: one historical, one prospective) to compare: (1) diagnostic accuracy and resulting mortality-prevention performance of traditional screening methods versus questionnaire/electrocardiography/s-MRI, during 2-month periods of intense, structured exercise (in military recruits, in advanced state of preparation); (2) global costs and cost/efficiency between these two methods. This study should contribute significantly toward a comprehensive understanding of the incidence and causes of exercise-related mortality (including establishing a definition of hr-CVCs) while aiming to reduce mortality.