Cargando…

National Bariatric Surgery Registries: an International Comparison

INTRODUCTION: Pooling population-based data from all national bariatric registries may provide international real-world evidence for outcomes that will help establish a universal standard of care, provided that the same variables and definitions are used. Therefore, this study aims to assess the con...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Akpinar, Erman O., Marang- van de Mheen, Perla J., Nienhuijs, Simon W., Greve, Jan Willem M., Liem, Ronald S. L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8175300/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33786743
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05359-0
_version_ 1783703025460707328
author Akpinar, Erman O.
Marang- van de Mheen, Perla J.
Nienhuijs, Simon W.
Greve, Jan Willem M.
Liem, Ronald S. L.
author_facet Akpinar, Erman O.
Marang- van de Mheen, Perla J.
Nienhuijs, Simon W.
Greve, Jan Willem M.
Liem, Ronald S. L.
author_sort Akpinar, Erman O.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Pooling population-based data from all national bariatric registries may provide international real-world evidence for outcomes that will help establish a universal standard of care, provided that the same variables and definitions are used. Therefore, this study aims to assess the concordance of variables across national registries to identify which outcomes can be used for international collaborations. METHODS: All 18 countries with a national bariatric registry who contributed to The International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO) Global Registry report 2019 were requested to share their data dictionary by email. The primary outcome was the percentage of perfect agreement for variables by domain: patient, prior bariatric history, screening, operation, complication, and follow-up. Perfect agreement was defined as 100% concordance, meaning that the variable was registered with the same definition across all registries. Secondary outcomes were defined as variables having “substantial agreement” (75–99.9%) and “moderate agreement” (50–74.9%) across registries. RESULTS: Eleven registries responded and had a total of 2585 recorded variables that were grouped into 250 variables measuring the same concept. A total of 25 (10%) variables have a perfect agreement across all domains: 3 (18.75%) for the patient domain, 0 (0.0%) for prior bariatric history, 5 (8.2%) for screening, 6 (11.8%) for operation, 5 (8.8%) for complications, and 6 (11.8%) for follow-up. Furthermore, 28 (11.2%) variables have substantial agreement and 59 (23.6%) variables have moderate agreement across registries. CONCLUSION: There is limited uniform agreement in variables across national bariatric registries. Further alignment and uniformity in collected variables are required to enable future international collaborations and comparison. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11695-021-05359-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8175300
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81753002021-06-17 National Bariatric Surgery Registries: an International Comparison Akpinar, Erman O. Marang- van de Mheen, Perla J. Nienhuijs, Simon W. Greve, Jan Willem M. Liem, Ronald S. L. Obes Surg Original Contributions INTRODUCTION: Pooling population-based data from all national bariatric registries may provide international real-world evidence for outcomes that will help establish a universal standard of care, provided that the same variables and definitions are used. Therefore, this study aims to assess the concordance of variables across national registries to identify which outcomes can be used for international collaborations. METHODS: All 18 countries with a national bariatric registry who contributed to The International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO) Global Registry report 2019 were requested to share their data dictionary by email. The primary outcome was the percentage of perfect agreement for variables by domain: patient, prior bariatric history, screening, operation, complication, and follow-up. Perfect agreement was defined as 100% concordance, meaning that the variable was registered with the same definition across all registries. Secondary outcomes were defined as variables having “substantial agreement” (75–99.9%) and “moderate agreement” (50–74.9%) across registries. RESULTS: Eleven registries responded and had a total of 2585 recorded variables that were grouped into 250 variables measuring the same concept. A total of 25 (10%) variables have a perfect agreement across all domains: 3 (18.75%) for the patient domain, 0 (0.0%) for prior bariatric history, 5 (8.2%) for screening, 6 (11.8%) for operation, 5 (8.8%) for complications, and 6 (11.8%) for follow-up. Furthermore, 28 (11.2%) variables have substantial agreement and 59 (23.6%) variables have moderate agreement across registries. CONCLUSION: There is limited uniform agreement in variables across national bariatric registries. Further alignment and uniformity in collected variables are required to enable future international collaborations and comparison. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11695-021-05359-0. Springer US 2021-03-30 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8175300/ /pubmed/33786743 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05359-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Contributions
Akpinar, Erman O.
Marang- van de Mheen, Perla J.
Nienhuijs, Simon W.
Greve, Jan Willem M.
Liem, Ronald S. L.
National Bariatric Surgery Registries: an International Comparison
title National Bariatric Surgery Registries: an International Comparison
title_full National Bariatric Surgery Registries: an International Comparison
title_fullStr National Bariatric Surgery Registries: an International Comparison
title_full_unstemmed National Bariatric Surgery Registries: an International Comparison
title_short National Bariatric Surgery Registries: an International Comparison
title_sort national bariatric surgery registries: an international comparison
topic Original Contributions
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8175300/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33786743
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05359-0
work_keys_str_mv AT akpinarermano nationalbariatricsurgeryregistriesaninternationalcomparison
AT marangvandemheenperlaj nationalbariatricsurgeryregistriesaninternationalcomparison
AT nienhuijssimonw nationalbariatricsurgeryregistriesaninternationalcomparison
AT grevejanwillemm nationalbariatricsurgeryregistriesaninternationalcomparison
AT liemronaldsl nationalbariatricsurgeryregistriesaninternationalcomparison