Cargando…
National Bariatric Surgery Registries: an International Comparison
INTRODUCTION: Pooling population-based data from all national bariatric registries may provide international real-world evidence for outcomes that will help establish a universal standard of care, provided that the same variables and definitions are used. Therefore, this study aims to assess the con...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8175300/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33786743 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05359-0 |
_version_ | 1783703025460707328 |
---|---|
author | Akpinar, Erman O. Marang- van de Mheen, Perla J. Nienhuijs, Simon W. Greve, Jan Willem M. Liem, Ronald S. L. |
author_facet | Akpinar, Erman O. Marang- van de Mheen, Perla J. Nienhuijs, Simon W. Greve, Jan Willem M. Liem, Ronald S. L. |
author_sort | Akpinar, Erman O. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Pooling population-based data from all national bariatric registries may provide international real-world evidence for outcomes that will help establish a universal standard of care, provided that the same variables and definitions are used. Therefore, this study aims to assess the concordance of variables across national registries to identify which outcomes can be used for international collaborations. METHODS: All 18 countries with a national bariatric registry who contributed to The International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO) Global Registry report 2019 were requested to share their data dictionary by email. The primary outcome was the percentage of perfect agreement for variables by domain: patient, prior bariatric history, screening, operation, complication, and follow-up. Perfect agreement was defined as 100% concordance, meaning that the variable was registered with the same definition across all registries. Secondary outcomes were defined as variables having “substantial agreement” (75–99.9%) and “moderate agreement” (50–74.9%) across registries. RESULTS: Eleven registries responded and had a total of 2585 recorded variables that were grouped into 250 variables measuring the same concept. A total of 25 (10%) variables have a perfect agreement across all domains: 3 (18.75%) for the patient domain, 0 (0.0%) for prior bariatric history, 5 (8.2%) for screening, 6 (11.8%) for operation, 5 (8.8%) for complications, and 6 (11.8%) for follow-up. Furthermore, 28 (11.2%) variables have substantial agreement and 59 (23.6%) variables have moderate agreement across registries. CONCLUSION: There is limited uniform agreement in variables across national bariatric registries. Further alignment and uniformity in collected variables are required to enable future international collaborations and comparison. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11695-021-05359-0. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8175300 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81753002021-06-17 National Bariatric Surgery Registries: an International Comparison Akpinar, Erman O. Marang- van de Mheen, Perla J. Nienhuijs, Simon W. Greve, Jan Willem M. Liem, Ronald S. L. Obes Surg Original Contributions INTRODUCTION: Pooling population-based data from all national bariatric registries may provide international real-world evidence for outcomes that will help establish a universal standard of care, provided that the same variables and definitions are used. Therefore, this study aims to assess the concordance of variables across national registries to identify which outcomes can be used for international collaborations. METHODS: All 18 countries with a national bariatric registry who contributed to The International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO) Global Registry report 2019 were requested to share their data dictionary by email. The primary outcome was the percentage of perfect agreement for variables by domain: patient, prior bariatric history, screening, operation, complication, and follow-up. Perfect agreement was defined as 100% concordance, meaning that the variable was registered with the same definition across all registries. Secondary outcomes were defined as variables having “substantial agreement” (75–99.9%) and “moderate agreement” (50–74.9%) across registries. RESULTS: Eleven registries responded and had a total of 2585 recorded variables that were grouped into 250 variables measuring the same concept. A total of 25 (10%) variables have a perfect agreement across all domains: 3 (18.75%) for the patient domain, 0 (0.0%) for prior bariatric history, 5 (8.2%) for screening, 6 (11.8%) for operation, 5 (8.8%) for complications, and 6 (11.8%) for follow-up. Furthermore, 28 (11.2%) variables have substantial agreement and 59 (23.6%) variables have moderate agreement across registries. CONCLUSION: There is limited uniform agreement in variables across national bariatric registries. Further alignment and uniformity in collected variables are required to enable future international collaborations and comparison. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11695-021-05359-0. Springer US 2021-03-30 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8175300/ /pubmed/33786743 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05359-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Contributions Akpinar, Erman O. Marang- van de Mheen, Perla J. Nienhuijs, Simon W. Greve, Jan Willem M. Liem, Ronald S. L. National Bariatric Surgery Registries: an International Comparison |
title | National Bariatric Surgery Registries: an International Comparison |
title_full | National Bariatric Surgery Registries: an International Comparison |
title_fullStr | National Bariatric Surgery Registries: an International Comparison |
title_full_unstemmed | National Bariatric Surgery Registries: an International Comparison |
title_short | National Bariatric Surgery Registries: an International Comparison |
title_sort | national bariatric surgery registries: an international comparison |
topic | Original Contributions |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8175300/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33786743 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05359-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT akpinarermano nationalbariatricsurgeryregistriesaninternationalcomparison AT marangvandemheenperlaj nationalbariatricsurgeryregistriesaninternationalcomparison AT nienhuijssimonw nationalbariatricsurgeryregistriesaninternationalcomparison AT grevejanwillemm nationalbariatricsurgeryregistriesaninternationalcomparison AT liemronaldsl nationalbariatricsurgeryregistriesaninternationalcomparison |