Cargando…

Endourology Methods in Pediatric Population for Kidney Stones Located in Lower Calyx: FlexURS vs. Micro PCNL (MicroPERC®)

Kidney stone disease in children is always a therapeutic challenge. It is a multifactorial condition and it should be approached, diagnosed and treated as such. One of the biggest challenges is kidney stones located in the lower renal calyx. There are currently three main surgical techniques to trea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Halinski, Adam, Steyaert, Henri, Wojciech, Magdalena, Sobolewski, Bartłomiej, Haliński, Andrzej
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8175969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34095024
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2021.640995
_version_ 1783703160058019840
author Halinski, Adam
Steyaert, Henri
Wojciech, Magdalena
Sobolewski, Bartłomiej
Haliński, Andrzej
author_facet Halinski, Adam
Steyaert, Henri
Wojciech, Magdalena
Sobolewski, Bartłomiej
Haliński, Andrzej
author_sort Halinski, Adam
collection PubMed
description Kidney stone disease in children is always a therapeutic challenge. It is a multifactorial condition and it should be approached, diagnosed and treated as such. One of the biggest challenges is kidney stones located in the lower renal calyx. There are currently three main surgical techniques to treat this condition: ESWL—Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy, RIRS—Retrograde IntraRenal Surgery, and PCNL—PerCutaneous Nephro-Lithotripsy. In pediatric population, the most frequently used method is ESWL, and in the event of failure, endoscopic procedures are the second-best choice. In this article, a sample of 53 children admitted to a tertiary medical center was examined. Thirty-eight of those children underwent flexible URS, while the remaining 15—micro PCNL. The average size of the deposit in the former group was 12.2 mm, against 13.5 mm in the latter. The full Stone Free Rate (SFR) was achieved in RIRS at 84.21 and 86.7% in percutaneous nephrolithotripsy. Flexible ureterorenoscopy and MicroPERC are two comparably effective methods for treating lower calyx stones of any size. However, according to our data, flexible ureterorenoscopy carries a lower risk of complications and inpatient care (with the mean of 3 days). The learning curve for these procedures in pediatric urology is long and relies on a limited number of patients. The number of pediatric patients qualifying for these procedures is restricted also due to the high efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in pediatric population. Radiation exposure is an important factor in every endoscopy procedure and should never exceed the limits set in the ALARA protocol. ESWL remains to this day the treatment of choice for stone disease in children and can be performed under ultrasound control. For many parents, it is a first-choice treatment preference for their child due to its greater apparent safety, although data on this remains insufficient. Prospective, randomized, multicenter trials are definitely needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8175969
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81759692021-06-05 Endourology Methods in Pediatric Population for Kidney Stones Located in Lower Calyx: FlexURS vs. Micro PCNL (MicroPERC®) Halinski, Adam Steyaert, Henri Wojciech, Magdalena Sobolewski, Bartłomiej Haliński, Andrzej Front Pediatr Pediatrics Kidney stone disease in children is always a therapeutic challenge. It is a multifactorial condition and it should be approached, diagnosed and treated as such. One of the biggest challenges is kidney stones located in the lower renal calyx. There are currently three main surgical techniques to treat this condition: ESWL—Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy, RIRS—Retrograde IntraRenal Surgery, and PCNL—PerCutaneous Nephro-Lithotripsy. In pediatric population, the most frequently used method is ESWL, and in the event of failure, endoscopic procedures are the second-best choice. In this article, a sample of 53 children admitted to a tertiary medical center was examined. Thirty-eight of those children underwent flexible URS, while the remaining 15—micro PCNL. The average size of the deposit in the former group was 12.2 mm, against 13.5 mm in the latter. The full Stone Free Rate (SFR) was achieved in RIRS at 84.21 and 86.7% in percutaneous nephrolithotripsy. Flexible ureterorenoscopy and MicroPERC are two comparably effective methods for treating lower calyx stones of any size. However, according to our data, flexible ureterorenoscopy carries a lower risk of complications and inpatient care (with the mean of 3 days). The learning curve for these procedures in pediatric urology is long and relies on a limited number of patients. The number of pediatric patients qualifying for these procedures is restricted also due to the high efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in pediatric population. Radiation exposure is an important factor in every endoscopy procedure and should never exceed the limits set in the ALARA protocol. ESWL remains to this day the treatment of choice for stone disease in children and can be performed under ultrasound control. For many parents, it is a first-choice treatment preference for their child due to its greater apparent safety, although data on this remains insufficient. Prospective, randomized, multicenter trials are definitely needed. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8175969/ /pubmed/34095024 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2021.640995 Text en Copyright © 2021 Halinski, Steyaert, Wojciech, Sobolewski and Haliński. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pediatrics
Halinski, Adam
Steyaert, Henri
Wojciech, Magdalena
Sobolewski, Bartłomiej
Haliński, Andrzej
Endourology Methods in Pediatric Population for Kidney Stones Located in Lower Calyx: FlexURS vs. Micro PCNL (MicroPERC®)
title Endourology Methods in Pediatric Population for Kidney Stones Located in Lower Calyx: FlexURS vs. Micro PCNL (MicroPERC®)
title_full Endourology Methods in Pediatric Population for Kidney Stones Located in Lower Calyx: FlexURS vs. Micro PCNL (MicroPERC®)
title_fullStr Endourology Methods in Pediatric Population for Kidney Stones Located in Lower Calyx: FlexURS vs. Micro PCNL (MicroPERC®)
title_full_unstemmed Endourology Methods in Pediatric Population for Kidney Stones Located in Lower Calyx: FlexURS vs. Micro PCNL (MicroPERC®)
title_short Endourology Methods in Pediatric Population for Kidney Stones Located in Lower Calyx: FlexURS vs. Micro PCNL (MicroPERC®)
title_sort endourology methods in pediatric population for kidney stones located in lower calyx: flexurs vs. micro pcnl (microperc®)
topic Pediatrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8175969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34095024
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2021.640995
work_keys_str_mv AT halinskiadam endourologymethodsinpediatricpopulationforkidneystoneslocatedinlowercalyxflexursvsmicropcnlmicroperc
AT steyaerthenri endourologymethodsinpediatricpopulationforkidneystoneslocatedinlowercalyxflexursvsmicropcnlmicroperc
AT wojciechmagdalena endourologymethodsinpediatricpopulationforkidneystoneslocatedinlowercalyxflexursvsmicropcnlmicroperc
AT sobolewskibartłomiej endourologymethodsinpediatricpopulationforkidneystoneslocatedinlowercalyxflexursvsmicropcnlmicroperc
AT halinskiandrzej endourologymethodsinpediatricpopulationforkidneystoneslocatedinlowercalyxflexursvsmicropcnlmicroperc