Cargando…

Comparative anticancer activities of Ficus carica and Ficus salicifolia latex in MDA-MB-231 cells

Ficus latex is rich in polyphenolic compounds and hence considered as an antioxidant and anti-proliferative. Many studies are available on Ficus carica (common fig) whereas Ficus salicifolia is less studied. F. salicifolia grows in a harsh dry environment, therefore its latex was selected in the cur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: AlGhalban, Fatma Mousa, Khan, Amir Ali, Khattak, Muhammad Nasir Khan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8176001/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34121859
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.02.061
_version_ 1783703167486132224
author AlGhalban, Fatma Mousa
Khan, Amir Ali
Khattak, Muhammad Nasir Khan
author_facet AlGhalban, Fatma Mousa
Khan, Amir Ali
Khattak, Muhammad Nasir Khan
author_sort AlGhalban, Fatma Mousa
collection PubMed
description Ficus latex is rich in polyphenolic compounds and hence considered as an antioxidant and anti-proliferative. Many studies are available on Ficus carica (common fig) whereas Ficus salicifolia is less studied. F. salicifolia grows in a harsh dry environment, therefore its latex was selected in the current study along with the F. carica for their comparative anti-cancer potential and the involved molecular mechanism. Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) derived MDA-MB-231 cells were used in the study. MTT and morphological studies indicated that the latex of both plants has anti-proliferative effects. To know their anti-metastatic effects, a wound-healing assay was performed. Both species were able to maintain the wound size compared to the untreated cells indicating their anti-metastatic effects. Using a DNA damage assay kit, we found that both fig species have genotoxic and cytotoxic effects in MDA-MB-231 cells compared to the untreated control. To know the potential molecular mechanism involved, we used a human kinase array kit. We found that ERK2, CREB, and AKT2 were downregulated after treatment the MDA-Mb-231 cells with the latex of F. carica. We assumed that F. salicifolia will also affect the same pathways, however after confirmation through real-time (RT)-PCR, downregulations of the above mentioned pathways were confirmed in cells treated with F. carica latex, however, in cells treated with F. salicifolia the selected genes were upregulated at the transcriptional level. We conclude that latex of both species of ficus have anti-cancer effects in MDA-MB-231 cells, however differ in their level of toxicity and the mechanism of action at the molecular level.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8176001
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81760012021-06-11 Comparative anticancer activities of Ficus carica and Ficus salicifolia latex in MDA-MB-231 cells AlGhalban, Fatma Mousa Khan, Amir Ali Khattak, Muhammad Nasir Khan Saudi J Biol Sci Original Article Ficus latex is rich in polyphenolic compounds and hence considered as an antioxidant and anti-proliferative. Many studies are available on Ficus carica (common fig) whereas Ficus salicifolia is less studied. F. salicifolia grows in a harsh dry environment, therefore its latex was selected in the current study along with the F. carica for their comparative anti-cancer potential and the involved molecular mechanism. Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) derived MDA-MB-231 cells were used in the study. MTT and morphological studies indicated that the latex of both plants has anti-proliferative effects. To know their anti-metastatic effects, a wound-healing assay was performed. Both species were able to maintain the wound size compared to the untreated cells indicating their anti-metastatic effects. Using a DNA damage assay kit, we found that both fig species have genotoxic and cytotoxic effects in MDA-MB-231 cells compared to the untreated control. To know the potential molecular mechanism involved, we used a human kinase array kit. We found that ERK2, CREB, and AKT2 were downregulated after treatment the MDA-Mb-231 cells with the latex of F. carica. We assumed that F. salicifolia will also affect the same pathways, however after confirmation through real-time (RT)-PCR, downregulations of the above mentioned pathways were confirmed in cells treated with F. carica latex, however, in cells treated with F. salicifolia the selected genes were upregulated at the transcriptional level. We conclude that latex of both species of ficus have anti-cancer effects in MDA-MB-231 cells, however differ in their level of toxicity and the mechanism of action at the molecular level. Elsevier 2021-06 2021-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8176001/ /pubmed/34121859 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.02.061 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
AlGhalban, Fatma Mousa
Khan, Amir Ali
Khattak, Muhammad Nasir Khan
Comparative anticancer activities of Ficus carica and Ficus salicifolia latex in MDA-MB-231 cells
title Comparative anticancer activities of Ficus carica and Ficus salicifolia latex in MDA-MB-231 cells
title_full Comparative anticancer activities of Ficus carica and Ficus salicifolia latex in MDA-MB-231 cells
title_fullStr Comparative anticancer activities of Ficus carica and Ficus salicifolia latex in MDA-MB-231 cells
title_full_unstemmed Comparative anticancer activities of Ficus carica and Ficus salicifolia latex in MDA-MB-231 cells
title_short Comparative anticancer activities of Ficus carica and Ficus salicifolia latex in MDA-MB-231 cells
title_sort comparative anticancer activities of ficus carica and ficus salicifolia latex in mda-mb-231 cells
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8176001/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34121859
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.02.061
work_keys_str_mv AT alghalbanfatmamousa comparativeanticanceractivitiesofficuscaricaandficussalicifolialatexinmdamb231cells
AT khanamirali comparativeanticanceractivitiesofficuscaricaandficussalicifolialatexinmdamb231cells
AT khattakmuhammadnasirkhan comparativeanticanceractivitiesofficuscaricaandficussalicifolialatexinmdamb231cells