Cargando…
Comparative anticancer activities of Ficus carica and Ficus salicifolia latex in MDA-MB-231 cells
Ficus latex is rich in polyphenolic compounds and hence considered as an antioxidant and anti-proliferative. Many studies are available on Ficus carica (common fig) whereas Ficus salicifolia is less studied. F. salicifolia grows in a harsh dry environment, therefore its latex was selected in the cur...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8176001/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34121859 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.02.061 |
_version_ | 1783703167486132224 |
---|---|
author | AlGhalban, Fatma Mousa Khan, Amir Ali Khattak, Muhammad Nasir Khan |
author_facet | AlGhalban, Fatma Mousa Khan, Amir Ali Khattak, Muhammad Nasir Khan |
author_sort | AlGhalban, Fatma Mousa |
collection | PubMed |
description | Ficus latex is rich in polyphenolic compounds and hence considered as an antioxidant and anti-proliferative. Many studies are available on Ficus carica (common fig) whereas Ficus salicifolia is less studied. F. salicifolia grows in a harsh dry environment, therefore its latex was selected in the current study along with the F. carica for their comparative anti-cancer potential and the involved molecular mechanism. Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) derived MDA-MB-231 cells were used in the study. MTT and morphological studies indicated that the latex of both plants has anti-proliferative effects. To know their anti-metastatic effects, a wound-healing assay was performed. Both species were able to maintain the wound size compared to the untreated cells indicating their anti-metastatic effects. Using a DNA damage assay kit, we found that both fig species have genotoxic and cytotoxic effects in MDA-MB-231 cells compared to the untreated control. To know the potential molecular mechanism involved, we used a human kinase array kit. We found that ERK2, CREB, and AKT2 were downregulated after treatment the MDA-Mb-231 cells with the latex of F. carica. We assumed that F. salicifolia will also affect the same pathways, however after confirmation through real-time (RT)-PCR, downregulations of the above mentioned pathways were confirmed in cells treated with F. carica latex, however, in cells treated with F. salicifolia the selected genes were upregulated at the transcriptional level. We conclude that latex of both species of ficus have anti-cancer effects in MDA-MB-231 cells, however differ in their level of toxicity and the mechanism of action at the molecular level. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8176001 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81760012021-06-11 Comparative anticancer activities of Ficus carica and Ficus salicifolia latex in MDA-MB-231 cells AlGhalban, Fatma Mousa Khan, Amir Ali Khattak, Muhammad Nasir Khan Saudi J Biol Sci Original Article Ficus latex is rich in polyphenolic compounds and hence considered as an antioxidant and anti-proliferative. Many studies are available on Ficus carica (common fig) whereas Ficus salicifolia is less studied. F. salicifolia grows in a harsh dry environment, therefore its latex was selected in the current study along with the F. carica for their comparative anti-cancer potential and the involved molecular mechanism. Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) derived MDA-MB-231 cells were used in the study. MTT and morphological studies indicated that the latex of both plants has anti-proliferative effects. To know their anti-metastatic effects, a wound-healing assay was performed. Both species were able to maintain the wound size compared to the untreated cells indicating their anti-metastatic effects. Using a DNA damage assay kit, we found that both fig species have genotoxic and cytotoxic effects in MDA-MB-231 cells compared to the untreated control. To know the potential molecular mechanism involved, we used a human kinase array kit. We found that ERK2, CREB, and AKT2 were downregulated after treatment the MDA-Mb-231 cells with the latex of F. carica. We assumed that F. salicifolia will also affect the same pathways, however after confirmation through real-time (RT)-PCR, downregulations of the above mentioned pathways were confirmed in cells treated with F. carica latex, however, in cells treated with F. salicifolia the selected genes were upregulated at the transcriptional level. We conclude that latex of both species of ficus have anti-cancer effects in MDA-MB-231 cells, however differ in their level of toxicity and the mechanism of action at the molecular level. Elsevier 2021-06 2021-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8176001/ /pubmed/34121859 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.02.061 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article AlGhalban, Fatma Mousa Khan, Amir Ali Khattak, Muhammad Nasir Khan Comparative anticancer activities of Ficus carica and Ficus salicifolia latex in MDA-MB-231 cells |
title | Comparative anticancer activities of Ficus carica and Ficus salicifolia latex in MDA-MB-231 cells |
title_full | Comparative anticancer activities of Ficus carica and Ficus salicifolia latex in MDA-MB-231 cells |
title_fullStr | Comparative anticancer activities of Ficus carica and Ficus salicifolia latex in MDA-MB-231 cells |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative anticancer activities of Ficus carica and Ficus salicifolia latex in MDA-MB-231 cells |
title_short | Comparative anticancer activities of Ficus carica and Ficus salicifolia latex in MDA-MB-231 cells |
title_sort | comparative anticancer activities of ficus carica and ficus salicifolia latex in mda-mb-231 cells |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8176001/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34121859 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.02.061 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alghalbanfatmamousa comparativeanticanceractivitiesofficuscaricaandficussalicifolialatexinmdamb231cells AT khanamirali comparativeanticanceractivitiesofficuscaricaandficussalicifolialatexinmdamb231cells AT khattakmuhammadnasirkhan comparativeanticanceractivitiesofficuscaricaandficussalicifolialatexinmdamb231cells |