Cargando…

A media intervention applying debunking versus non-debunking content to combat vaccine misinformation in elderly in the Netherlands: A digital randomised trial

BACKGROUND: As several COVID-19 vaccines are rolled-out globally, it has become important to develop an effective strategy for vaccine acceptance, especially in high-risk groups, such as elderly. Vaccine misconception was declared by WHO as one of the top 10 health issues in 2019. Here we test the e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yousuf, Hamza, van der Linden, Sander, Bredius, Luke, (Ted) van Essen, G.A., Sweep, Govert, Preminger, Zohar, van Gorp, Eric, Scherder, Erik, Narula, Jagat, Hofstra, Leonard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8176124/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34124631
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100881
_version_ 1783703195299610624
author Yousuf, Hamza
van der Linden, Sander
Bredius, Luke
(Ted) van Essen, G.A.
Sweep, Govert
Preminger, Zohar
van Gorp, Eric
Scherder, Erik
Narula, Jagat
Hofstra, Leonard
author_facet Yousuf, Hamza
van der Linden, Sander
Bredius, Luke
(Ted) van Essen, G.A.
Sweep, Govert
Preminger, Zohar
van Gorp, Eric
Scherder, Erik
Narula, Jagat
Hofstra, Leonard
author_sort Yousuf, Hamza
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: As several COVID-19 vaccines are rolled-out globally, it has become important to develop an effective strategy for vaccine acceptance, especially in high-risk groups, such as elderly. Vaccine misconception was declared by WHO as one of the top 10 health issues in 2019. Here we test the effectiveness of applying debunking to combat vaccine misinformation, and reduce vaccine hesitancy. METHODS: Participants were recruited via a daily news show on Dutch Television, targeted to elderly viewers. The study was conducted in 980 elderly citizens during the October 2020 National Influenza Vaccination Campaign. Borrowing from the recent literature in behavioural science and psychology we conducted a two-arm randomized blinded parallel study, in which participants were allocated to exposure to a video containing social norms, vaccine information plus debunking of vaccination myths (intervention group, n = 505) or a video only containing vaccine information plus social norm (control group, n = 475). Participants who viewed either of the video's and completed both a pre- and post-intervention survey on vaccination trust and knowledge, were included in the analysis. The main outcomes of this study were improvement on vaccine knowledge and awareness. FINDINGS: Participants were recruited from the 13th of October 2020 till the 16th of October 2020 and could immediately participate in the pre-intervention survey. Subsequently, eligible participants were randomly assigned to an interventional video and the follow-up survey, distributed through email on the 18th of October 2020, and available for participation till the 24th of October 2020. We found that exposure to the video with addition of debunking strategies on top of social norm modelling and information resulted in substantially stronger rejection of vaccination misconceptions, including the belief that: (1) vaccinations can cause Autism Spectrum Disorders; (2) vaccinations weaken the immune system; (3) influenza vaccination would hamper the COVID-19 vaccine efficacy. Additionally, we observed that exposure to debunking in the intervention resulted in enhanced trust in government. INTERPRETATION: Utilizing debunking in media campaigns on top of vaccine information and social norm modeling is an effective means to combat misinformation and distrust associated with vaccination in elderly, and could help maximize grounds for the acceptance of vaccines, including the COVID-19 vaccines. FUNDING: Dutch Influenza Foundation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8176124
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81761242021-06-11 A media intervention applying debunking versus non-debunking content to combat vaccine misinformation in elderly in the Netherlands: A digital randomised trial Yousuf, Hamza van der Linden, Sander Bredius, Luke (Ted) van Essen, G.A. Sweep, Govert Preminger, Zohar van Gorp, Eric Scherder, Erik Narula, Jagat Hofstra, Leonard EClinicalMedicine Research paper BACKGROUND: As several COVID-19 vaccines are rolled-out globally, it has become important to develop an effective strategy for vaccine acceptance, especially in high-risk groups, such as elderly. Vaccine misconception was declared by WHO as one of the top 10 health issues in 2019. Here we test the effectiveness of applying debunking to combat vaccine misinformation, and reduce vaccine hesitancy. METHODS: Participants were recruited via a daily news show on Dutch Television, targeted to elderly viewers. The study was conducted in 980 elderly citizens during the October 2020 National Influenza Vaccination Campaign. Borrowing from the recent literature in behavioural science and psychology we conducted a two-arm randomized blinded parallel study, in which participants were allocated to exposure to a video containing social norms, vaccine information plus debunking of vaccination myths (intervention group, n = 505) or a video only containing vaccine information plus social norm (control group, n = 475). Participants who viewed either of the video's and completed both a pre- and post-intervention survey on vaccination trust and knowledge, were included in the analysis. The main outcomes of this study were improvement on vaccine knowledge and awareness. FINDINGS: Participants were recruited from the 13th of October 2020 till the 16th of October 2020 and could immediately participate in the pre-intervention survey. Subsequently, eligible participants were randomly assigned to an interventional video and the follow-up survey, distributed through email on the 18th of October 2020, and available for participation till the 24th of October 2020. We found that exposure to the video with addition of debunking strategies on top of social norm modelling and information resulted in substantially stronger rejection of vaccination misconceptions, including the belief that: (1) vaccinations can cause Autism Spectrum Disorders; (2) vaccinations weaken the immune system; (3) influenza vaccination would hamper the COVID-19 vaccine efficacy. Additionally, we observed that exposure to debunking in the intervention resulted in enhanced trust in government. INTERPRETATION: Utilizing debunking in media campaigns on top of vaccine information and social norm modeling is an effective means to combat misinformation and distrust associated with vaccination in elderly, and could help maximize grounds for the acceptance of vaccines, including the COVID-19 vaccines. FUNDING: Dutch Influenza Foundation. Elsevier 2021-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8176124/ /pubmed/34124631 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100881 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research paper
Yousuf, Hamza
van der Linden, Sander
Bredius, Luke
(Ted) van Essen, G.A.
Sweep, Govert
Preminger, Zohar
van Gorp, Eric
Scherder, Erik
Narula, Jagat
Hofstra, Leonard
A media intervention applying debunking versus non-debunking content to combat vaccine misinformation in elderly in the Netherlands: A digital randomised trial
title A media intervention applying debunking versus non-debunking content to combat vaccine misinformation in elderly in the Netherlands: A digital randomised trial
title_full A media intervention applying debunking versus non-debunking content to combat vaccine misinformation in elderly in the Netherlands: A digital randomised trial
title_fullStr A media intervention applying debunking versus non-debunking content to combat vaccine misinformation in elderly in the Netherlands: A digital randomised trial
title_full_unstemmed A media intervention applying debunking versus non-debunking content to combat vaccine misinformation in elderly in the Netherlands: A digital randomised trial
title_short A media intervention applying debunking versus non-debunking content to combat vaccine misinformation in elderly in the Netherlands: A digital randomised trial
title_sort media intervention applying debunking versus non-debunking content to combat vaccine misinformation in elderly in the netherlands: a digital randomised trial
topic Research paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8176124/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34124631
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100881
work_keys_str_mv AT yousufhamza amediainterventionapplyingdebunkingversusnondebunkingcontenttocombatvaccinemisinformationinelderlyinthenetherlandsadigitalrandomisedtrial
AT vanderlindensander amediainterventionapplyingdebunkingversusnondebunkingcontenttocombatvaccinemisinformationinelderlyinthenetherlandsadigitalrandomisedtrial
AT brediusluke amediainterventionapplyingdebunkingversusnondebunkingcontenttocombatvaccinemisinformationinelderlyinthenetherlandsadigitalrandomisedtrial
AT tedvanessenga amediainterventionapplyingdebunkingversusnondebunkingcontenttocombatvaccinemisinformationinelderlyinthenetherlandsadigitalrandomisedtrial
AT sweepgovert amediainterventionapplyingdebunkingversusnondebunkingcontenttocombatvaccinemisinformationinelderlyinthenetherlandsadigitalrandomisedtrial
AT premingerzohar amediainterventionapplyingdebunkingversusnondebunkingcontenttocombatvaccinemisinformationinelderlyinthenetherlandsadigitalrandomisedtrial
AT vangorperic amediainterventionapplyingdebunkingversusnondebunkingcontenttocombatvaccinemisinformationinelderlyinthenetherlandsadigitalrandomisedtrial
AT scherdererik amediainterventionapplyingdebunkingversusnondebunkingcontenttocombatvaccinemisinformationinelderlyinthenetherlandsadigitalrandomisedtrial
AT narulajagat amediainterventionapplyingdebunkingversusnondebunkingcontenttocombatvaccinemisinformationinelderlyinthenetherlandsadigitalrandomisedtrial
AT hofstraleonard amediainterventionapplyingdebunkingversusnondebunkingcontenttocombatvaccinemisinformationinelderlyinthenetherlandsadigitalrandomisedtrial
AT yousufhamza mediainterventionapplyingdebunkingversusnondebunkingcontenttocombatvaccinemisinformationinelderlyinthenetherlandsadigitalrandomisedtrial
AT vanderlindensander mediainterventionapplyingdebunkingversusnondebunkingcontenttocombatvaccinemisinformationinelderlyinthenetherlandsadigitalrandomisedtrial
AT brediusluke mediainterventionapplyingdebunkingversusnondebunkingcontenttocombatvaccinemisinformationinelderlyinthenetherlandsadigitalrandomisedtrial
AT tedvanessenga mediainterventionapplyingdebunkingversusnondebunkingcontenttocombatvaccinemisinformationinelderlyinthenetherlandsadigitalrandomisedtrial
AT sweepgovert mediainterventionapplyingdebunkingversusnondebunkingcontenttocombatvaccinemisinformationinelderlyinthenetherlandsadigitalrandomisedtrial
AT premingerzohar mediainterventionapplyingdebunkingversusnondebunkingcontenttocombatvaccinemisinformationinelderlyinthenetherlandsadigitalrandomisedtrial
AT vangorperic mediainterventionapplyingdebunkingversusnondebunkingcontenttocombatvaccinemisinformationinelderlyinthenetherlandsadigitalrandomisedtrial
AT scherdererik mediainterventionapplyingdebunkingversusnondebunkingcontenttocombatvaccinemisinformationinelderlyinthenetherlandsadigitalrandomisedtrial
AT narulajagat mediainterventionapplyingdebunkingversusnondebunkingcontenttocombatvaccinemisinformationinelderlyinthenetherlandsadigitalrandomisedtrial
AT hofstraleonard mediainterventionapplyingdebunkingversusnondebunkingcontenttocombatvaccinemisinformationinelderlyinthenetherlandsadigitalrandomisedtrial