Cargando…

Comparison of pregnancy outcomes using a time-lapse monitoring system for embryo incubation versus a conventional incubator in in vitro fertilization: An age-stratification analysis

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the pregnancy outcomes of in vitro fertilization with embryo transfer between embryos cultured in a time-lapse monitoring system (TLS) and those cultured in a conventional incubator (CI). METHODS: The medical records of 250 fertilized embryos from 141...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chera-aree, Pattraporn, Thanaboonyawat, Isarin, Thokha, Benjawan, Laokirkkiat, Pitak
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society for Reproductive Medicine 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8176153/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34024081
http://dx.doi.org/10.5653/cerm.2020.04091
_version_ 1783703200088457216
author Chera-aree, Pattraporn
Thanaboonyawat, Isarin
Thokha, Benjawan
Laokirkkiat, Pitak
author_facet Chera-aree, Pattraporn
Thanaboonyawat, Isarin
Thokha, Benjawan
Laokirkkiat, Pitak
author_sort Chera-aree, Pattraporn
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the pregnancy outcomes of in vitro fertilization with embryo transfer between embryos cultured in a time-lapse monitoring system (TLS) and those cultured in a conventional incubator (CI). METHODS: The medical records of 250 fertilized embryos from 141 patients undergoing infertility treatment with assisted reproductive technology at a tertiary hospital from June 2018 to May 2020 were reviewed. The study population was divided into TLS and CI groups at a 1 to 1 ratio (125 embryos per group). The primary outcome was the live birth rate. RESULTS: The TLS group had a significantly higher clinical pregnancy rate (46.4% vs. 27.2%, p=0.002), implantation rate (27.1% vs. 12.0%, p=0.004), and live birth rate (32.0% vs. 18.4%, p=0.013) than the CI group. Furthermore, subgroup analyses of the clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate in the different age groups favored the TLS group. However, this difference only reached statistical significance in the live birth rate in women aged over 40 years and the clinical pregnancy rate in women aged 35–40 years (p=0.048 and p=0.031, respectively). The miscarriage rate, cleavage rate, and blastocyst rate were comparable. CONCLUSION: TLS application improved the live birth rate, implantation rate, and clinical pregnancy rate, particularly in the advanced age group in this study, while the other reproductive outcomes were comparable. Large randomized controlled trials are needed to further explore the ramifications of these findings, especially in different age groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8176153
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Korean Society for Reproductive Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81761532021-06-15 Comparison of pregnancy outcomes using a time-lapse monitoring system for embryo incubation versus a conventional incubator in in vitro fertilization: An age-stratification analysis Chera-aree, Pattraporn Thanaboonyawat, Isarin Thokha, Benjawan Laokirkkiat, Pitak Clin Exp Reprod Med Original Article OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the pregnancy outcomes of in vitro fertilization with embryo transfer between embryos cultured in a time-lapse monitoring system (TLS) and those cultured in a conventional incubator (CI). METHODS: The medical records of 250 fertilized embryos from 141 patients undergoing infertility treatment with assisted reproductive technology at a tertiary hospital from June 2018 to May 2020 were reviewed. The study population was divided into TLS and CI groups at a 1 to 1 ratio (125 embryos per group). The primary outcome was the live birth rate. RESULTS: The TLS group had a significantly higher clinical pregnancy rate (46.4% vs. 27.2%, p=0.002), implantation rate (27.1% vs. 12.0%, p=0.004), and live birth rate (32.0% vs. 18.4%, p=0.013) than the CI group. Furthermore, subgroup analyses of the clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate in the different age groups favored the TLS group. However, this difference only reached statistical significance in the live birth rate in women aged over 40 years and the clinical pregnancy rate in women aged 35–40 years (p=0.048 and p=0.031, respectively). The miscarriage rate, cleavage rate, and blastocyst rate were comparable. CONCLUSION: TLS application improved the live birth rate, implantation rate, and clinical pregnancy rate, particularly in the advanced age group in this study, while the other reproductive outcomes were comparable. Large randomized controlled trials are needed to further explore the ramifications of these findings, especially in different age groups. Korean Society for Reproductive Medicine 2021-06 2021-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8176153/ /pubmed/34024081 http://dx.doi.org/10.5653/cerm.2020.04091 Text en Copyright © 2021. THE KOREAN SOCIETY FOR REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Chera-aree, Pattraporn
Thanaboonyawat, Isarin
Thokha, Benjawan
Laokirkkiat, Pitak
Comparison of pregnancy outcomes using a time-lapse monitoring system for embryo incubation versus a conventional incubator in in vitro fertilization: An age-stratification analysis
title Comparison of pregnancy outcomes using a time-lapse monitoring system for embryo incubation versus a conventional incubator in in vitro fertilization: An age-stratification analysis
title_full Comparison of pregnancy outcomes using a time-lapse monitoring system for embryo incubation versus a conventional incubator in in vitro fertilization: An age-stratification analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of pregnancy outcomes using a time-lapse monitoring system for embryo incubation versus a conventional incubator in in vitro fertilization: An age-stratification analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of pregnancy outcomes using a time-lapse monitoring system for embryo incubation versus a conventional incubator in in vitro fertilization: An age-stratification analysis
title_short Comparison of pregnancy outcomes using a time-lapse monitoring system for embryo incubation versus a conventional incubator in in vitro fertilization: An age-stratification analysis
title_sort comparison of pregnancy outcomes using a time-lapse monitoring system for embryo incubation versus a conventional incubator in in vitro fertilization: an age-stratification analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8176153/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34024081
http://dx.doi.org/10.5653/cerm.2020.04091
work_keys_str_mv AT cheraareepattraporn comparisonofpregnancyoutcomesusingatimelapsemonitoringsystemforembryoincubationversusaconventionalincubatorininvitrofertilizationanagestratificationanalysis
AT thanaboonyawatisarin comparisonofpregnancyoutcomesusingatimelapsemonitoringsystemforembryoincubationversusaconventionalincubatorininvitrofertilizationanagestratificationanalysis
AT thokhabenjawan comparisonofpregnancyoutcomesusingatimelapsemonitoringsystemforembryoincubationversusaconventionalincubatorininvitrofertilizationanagestratificationanalysis
AT laokirkkiatpitak comparisonofpregnancyoutcomesusingatimelapsemonitoringsystemforembryoincubationversusaconventionalincubatorininvitrofertilizationanagestratificationanalysis