Cargando…

Myocardial contrast echocardiography assessment of mouse myocardial infarction: comparison of kinetic parameters with conventional methods

This study explores the use of a minimally invasive assessment of myocardial infarction (MI) in mice using myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE). The technique uses existing equipment and software readily available to the average researcher. C57/BL6 mice were randomized to either MI or sham sur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thielen, Nicholas T., Kleinsasser, Adison A., Freeling, Jessica L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8176928/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34141476
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11500
_version_ 1783703331470835712
author Thielen, Nicholas T.
Kleinsasser, Adison A.
Freeling, Jessica L.
author_facet Thielen, Nicholas T.
Kleinsasser, Adison A.
Freeling, Jessica L.
author_sort Thielen, Nicholas T.
collection PubMed
description This study explores the use of a minimally invasive assessment of myocardial infarction (MI) in mice using myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE). The technique uses existing equipment and software readily available to the average researcher. C57/BL6 mice were randomized to either MI or sham surgery and evaluated using MCE at 1- or 2-weeks post-surgery. Size-isolated microbubbles were injected via retro-orbital catheter where their non-linear characteristics were utilized to produce the two-dimensional parameters of Wash-in-Rate and the Peak Enhancement, indicative of relative myocardial perfusion and blood volume, respectively. Three-dimensional cardiac reconstructions allowed the calculation of the Percent Agent, interpreted as the vascularity of the entire myocardium. These MCE parameters were compared to conventional assessments including M-Mode, strain analysis, and 2,3,5-Triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC) staining. Except for the Wash-in-Rate 2-week cohort, all MCE parameters were able to differentiate sham-operated versus MI animals and correlated with TTC staining (P < 0.05). MCE parameters were also able to identify MI group animals which failed to develop infarctions as determined by TTC staining. This study provides basic validation of these MCE parameters to detect MI in mice complementary to conventional methods while providing additional hemodynamic information in vivo.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8176928
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81769282021-06-16 Myocardial contrast echocardiography assessment of mouse myocardial infarction: comparison of kinetic parameters with conventional methods Thielen, Nicholas T. Kleinsasser, Adison A. Freeling, Jessica L. PeerJ Biochemistry This study explores the use of a minimally invasive assessment of myocardial infarction (MI) in mice using myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE). The technique uses existing equipment and software readily available to the average researcher. C57/BL6 mice were randomized to either MI or sham surgery and evaluated using MCE at 1- or 2-weeks post-surgery. Size-isolated microbubbles were injected via retro-orbital catheter where their non-linear characteristics were utilized to produce the two-dimensional parameters of Wash-in-Rate and the Peak Enhancement, indicative of relative myocardial perfusion and blood volume, respectively. Three-dimensional cardiac reconstructions allowed the calculation of the Percent Agent, interpreted as the vascularity of the entire myocardium. These MCE parameters were compared to conventional assessments including M-Mode, strain analysis, and 2,3,5-Triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC) staining. Except for the Wash-in-Rate 2-week cohort, all MCE parameters were able to differentiate sham-operated versus MI animals and correlated with TTC staining (P < 0.05). MCE parameters were also able to identify MI group animals which failed to develop infarctions as determined by TTC staining. This study provides basic validation of these MCE parameters to detect MI in mice complementary to conventional methods while providing additional hemodynamic information in vivo. PeerJ Inc. 2021-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8176928/ /pubmed/34141476 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11500 Text en © 2021 Thielen et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Biochemistry
Thielen, Nicholas T.
Kleinsasser, Adison A.
Freeling, Jessica L.
Myocardial contrast echocardiography assessment of mouse myocardial infarction: comparison of kinetic parameters with conventional methods
title Myocardial contrast echocardiography assessment of mouse myocardial infarction: comparison of kinetic parameters with conventional methods
title_full Myocardial contrast echocardiography assessment of mouse myocardial infarction: comparison of kinetic parameters with conventional methods
title_fullStr Myocardial contrast echocardiography assessment of mouse myocardial infarction: comparison of kinetic parameters with conventional methods
title_full_unstemmed Myocardial contrast echocardiography assessment of mouse myocardial infarction: comparison of kinetic parameters with conventional methods
title_short Myocardial contrast echocardiography assessment of mouse myocardial infarction: comparison of kinetic parameters with conventional methods
title_sort myocardial contrast echocardiography assessment of mouse myocardial infarction: comparison of kinetic parameters with conventional methods
topic Biochemistry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8176928/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34141476
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11500
work_keys_str_mv AT thielennicholast myocardialcontrastechocardiographyassessmentofmousemyocardialinfarctioncomparisonofkineticparameterswithconventionalmethods
AT kleinsasseradisona myocardialcontrastechocardiographyassessmentofmousemyocardialinfarctioncomparisonofkineticparameterswithconventionalmethods
AT freelingjessical myocardialcontrastechocardiographyassessmentofmousemyocardialinfarctioncomparisonofkineticparameterswithconventionalmethods