Cargando…

Effectiveness of attentional bias modification training as add-on to regular treatment in alcohol and cannabis use disorder: A multicenter randomized control trial

BACKGROUND: Attentional bias for substance-relevant cues has been found to contribute to the persistence of addiction. Attentional bias modification (ABM) interventions might, therefore, increase positive treatment outcome and reduce relapse rates. The current study investigated the effectiveness of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heitmann, Janika, van Hemel-Ruiter, Madelon E., Huisman, Mark, Ostafin, Brian D., Wiers, Reinout W., MacLeod, Colin, DeFuentes-Merillas, Laura, Fledderus, Martine, Markus, Wiebren, de Jong, Peter J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8177423/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34086751
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252494
_version_ 1783703376725278720
author Heitmann, Janika
van Hemel-Ruiter, Madelon E.
Huisman, Mark
Ostafin, Brian D.
Wiers, Reinout W.
MacLeod, Colin
DeFuentes-Merillas, Laura
Fledderus, Martine
Markus, Wiebren
de Jong, Peter J.
author_facet Heitmann, Janika
van Hemel-Ruiter, Madelon E.
Huisman, Mark
Ostafin, Brian D.
Wiers, Reinout W.
MacLeod, Colin
DeFuentes-Merillas, Laura
Fledderus, Martine
Markus, Wiebren
de Jong, Peter J.
author_sort Heitmann, Janika
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Attentional bias for substance-relevant cues has been found to contribute to the persistence of addiction. Attentional bias modification (ABM) interventions might, therefore, increase positive treatment outcome and reduce relapse rates. The current study investigated the effectiveness of a newly developed home-delivered, multi-session, internet-based ABM intervention, the Bouncing Image Training Task (BITT), as an add-on to treatment as usual (TAU). METHODS: Participants (N = 169), diagnosed with alcohol or cannabis use disorder, were randomly assigned to one of two conditions: the experimental ABM group (50%; TAU+ABM); or the control group (50%; split in two subgroups the TAU+placebo group and TAU-only group, 25% each). Participants completed baseline, post-test, and 6 and 12 months follow-up measures of substance use and craving allowing to assess long-term treatment success and relapse rates. In addition, attentional bias (both engagement and disengagement), as well as secondary physical and psychological complaints (depression, anxiety, and stress) were assessed. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between conditions with regard to substance use, craving, relapse rates, attentional bias, or physical and psychological complaints. CONCLUSIONS: The findings may reflect unsuccessful modification of attentional bias, the BITT not targeting the relevant process (engagement vs. disengagement bias), or may relate to the diverse treatment goals of the current sample (i.e., moderation or abstinence). The current findings provide no support for the efficacy of this ABM approach as an add-on to TAU in alcohol or cannabis use disorder. Future studies need to delineate the role of engagement and disengagement bias in the persistence of addiction, and the role of treatment goal in the effectiveness of ABM interventions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8177423
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81774232021-06-07 Effectiveness of attentional bias modification training as add-on to regular treatment in alcohol and cannabis use disorder: A multicenter randomized control trial Heitmann, Janika van Hemel-Ruiter, Madelon E. Huisman, Mark Ostafin, Brian D. Wiers, Reinout W. MacLeod, Colin DeFuentes-Merillas, Laura Fledderus, Martine Markus, Wiebren de Jong, Peter J. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Attentional bias for substance-relevant cues has been found to contribute to the persistence of addiction. Attentional bias modification (ABM) interventions might, therefore, increase positive treatment outcome and reduce relapse rates. The current study investigated the effectiveness of a newly developed home-delivered, multi-session, internet-based ABM intervention, the Bouncing Image Training Task (BITT), as an add-on to treatment as usual (TAU). METHODS: Participants (N = 169), diagnosed with alcohol or cannabis use disorder, were randomly assigned to one of two conditions: the experimental ABM group (50%; TAU+ABM); or the control group (50%; split in two subgroups the TAU+placebo group and TAU-only group, 25% each). Participants completed baseline, post-test, and 6 and 12 months follow-up measures of substance use and craving allowing to assess long-term treatment success and relapse rates. In addition, attentional bias (both engagement and disengagement), as well as secondary physical and psychological complaints (depression, anxiety, and stress) were assessed. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between conditions with regard to substance use, craving, relapse rates, attentional bias, or physical and psychological complaints. CONCLUSIONS: The findings may reflect unsuccessful modification of attentional bias, the BITT not targeting the relevant process (engagement vs. disengagement bias), or may relate to the diverse treatment goals of the current sample (i.e., moderation or abstinence). The current findings provide no support for the efficacy of this ABM approach as an add-on to TAU in alcohol or cannabis use disorder. Future studies need to delineate the role of engagement and disengagement bias in the persistence of addiction, and the role of treatment goal in the effectiveness of ABM interventions. Public Library of Science 2021-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8177423/ /pubmed/34086751 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252494 Text en © 2021 Heitmann et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Heitmann, Janika
van Hemel-Ruiter, Madelon E.
Huisman, Mark
Ostafin, Brian D.
Wiers, Reinout W.
MacLeod, Colin
DeFuentes-Merillas, Laura
Fledderus, Martine
Markus, Wiebren
de Jong, Peter J.
Effectiveness of attentional bias modification training as add-on to regular treatment in alcohol and cannabis use disorder: A multicenter randomized control trial
title Effectiveness of attentional bias modification training as add-on to regular treatment in alcohol and cannabis use disorder: A multicenter randomized control trial
title_full Effectiveness of attentional bias modification training as add-on to regular treatment in alcohol and cannabis use disorder: A multicenter randomized control trial
title_fullStr Effectiveness of attentional bias modification training as add-on to regular treatment in alcohol and cannabis use disorder: A multicenter randomized control trial
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of attentional bias modification training as add-on to regular treatment in alcohol and cannabis use disorder: A multicenter randomized control trial
title_short Effectiveness of attentional bias modification training as add-on to regular treatment in alcohol and cannabis use disorder: A multicenter randomized control trial
title_sort effectiveness of attentional bias modification training as add-on to regular treatment in alcohol and cannabis use disorder: a multicenter randomized control trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8177423/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34086751
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252494
work_keys_str_mv AT heitmannjanika effectivenessofattentionalbiasmodificationtrainingasaddontoregulartreatmentinalcoholandcannabisusedisorderamulticenterrandomizedcontroltrial
AT vanhemelruitermadelone effectivenessofattentionalbiasmodificationtrainingasaddontoregulartreatmentinalcoholandcannabisusedisorderamulticenterrandomizedcontroltrial
AT huismanmark effectivenessofattentionalbiasmodificationtrainingasaddontoregulartreatmentinalcoholandcannabisusedisorderamulticenterrandomizedcontroltrial
AT ostafinbriand effectivenessofattentionalbiasmodificationtrainingasaddontoregulartreatmentinalcoholandcannabisusedisorderamulticenterrandomizedcontroltrial
AT wiersreinoutw effectivenessofattentionalbiasmodificationtrainingasaddontoregulartreatmentinalcoholandcannabisusedisorderamulticenterrandomizedcontroltrial
AT macleodcolin effectivenessofattentionalbiasmodificationtrainingasaddontoregulartreatmentinalcoholandcannabisusedisorderamulticenterrandomizedcontroltrial
AT defuentesmerillaslaura effectivenessofattentionalbiasmodificationtrainingasaddontoregulartreatmentinalcoholandcannabisusedisorderamulticenterrandomizedcontroltrial
AT fledderusmartine effectivenessofattentionalbiasmodificationtrainingasaddontoregulartreatmentinalcoholandcannabisusedisorderamulticenterrandomizedcontroltrial
AT markuswiebren effectivenessofattentionalbiasmodificationtrainingasaddontoregulartreatmentinalcoholandcannabisusedisorderamulticenterrandomizedcontroltrial
AT dejongpeterj effectivenessofattentionalbiasmodificationtrainingasaddontoregulartreatmentinalcoholandcannabisusedisorderamulticenterrandomizedcontroltrial