Cargando…
Effectiveness of attentional bias modification training as add-on to regular treatment in alcohol and cannabis use disorder: A multicenter randomized control trial
BACKGROUND: Attentional bias for substance-relevant cues has been found to contribute to the persistence of addiction. Attentional bias modification (ABM) interventions might, therefore, increase positive treatment outcome and reduce relapse rates. The current study investigated the effectiveness of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8177423/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34086751 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252494 |
_version_ | 1783703376725278720 |
---|---|
author | Heitmann, Janika van Hemel-Ruiter, Madelon E. Huisman, Mark Ostafin, Brian D. Wiers, Reinout W. MacLeod, Colin DeFuentes-Merillas, Laura Fledderus, Martine Markus, Wiebren de Jong, Peter J. |
author_facet | Heitmann, Janika van Hemel-Ruiter, Madelon E. Huisman, Mark Ostafin, Brian D. Wiers, Reinout W. MacLeod, Colin DeFuentes-Merillas, Laura Fledderus, Martine Markus, Wiebren de Jong, Peter J. |
author_sort | Heitmann, Janika |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Attentional bias for substance-relevant cues has been found to contribute to the persistence of addiction. Attentional bias modification (ABM) interventions might, therefore, increase positive treatment outcome and reduce relapse rates. The current study investigated the effectiveness of a newly developed home-delivered, multi-session, internet-based ABM intervention, the Bouncing Image Training Task (BITT), as an add-on to treatment as usual (TAU). METHODS: Participants (N = 169), diagnosed with alcohol or cannabis use disorder, were randomly assigned to one of two conditions: the experimental ABM group (50%; TAU+ABM); or the control group (50%; split in two subgroups the TAU+placebo group and TAU-only group, 25% each). Participants completed baseline, post-test, and 6 and 12 months follow-up measures of substance use and craving allowing to assess long-term treatment success and relapse rates. In addition, attentional bias (both engagement and disengagement), as well as secondary physical and psychological complaints (depression, anxiety, and stress) were assessed. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between conditions with regard to substance use, craving, relapse rates, attentional bias, or physical and psychological complaints. CONCLUSIONS: The findings may reflect unsuccessful modification of attentional bias, the BITT not targeting the relevant process (engagement vs. disengagement bias), or may relate to the diverse treatment goals of the current sample (i.e., moderation or abstinence). The current findings provide no support for the efficacy of this ABM approach as an add-on to TAU in alcohol or cannabis use disorder. Future studies need to delineate the role of engagement and disengagement bias in the persistence of addiction, and the role of treatment goal in the effectiveness of ABM interventions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8177423 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81774232021-06-07 Effectiveness of attentional bias modification training as add-on to regular treatment in alcohol and cannabis use disorder: A multicenter randomized control trial Heitmann, Janika van Hemel-Ruiter, Madelon E. Huisman, Mark Ostafin, Brian D. Wiers, Reinout W. MacLeod, Colin DeFuentes-Merillas, Laura Fledderus, Martine Markus, Wiebren de Jong, Peter J. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Attentional bias for substance-relevant cues has been found to contribute to the persistence of addiction. Attentional bias modification (ABM) interventions might, therefore, increase positive treatment outcome and reduce relapse rates. The current study investigated the effectiveness of a newly developed home-delivered, multi-session, internet-based ABM intervention, the Bouncing Image Training Task (BITT), as an add-on to treatment as usual (TAU). METHODS: Participants (N = 169), diagnosed with alcohol or cannabis use disorder, were randomly assigned to one of two conditions: the experimental ABM group (50%; TAU+ABM); or the control group (50%; split in two subgroups the TAU+placebo group and TAU-only group, 25% each). Participants completed baseline, post-test, and 6 and 12 months follow-up measures of substance use and craving allowing to assess long-term treatment success and relapse rates. In addition, attentional bias (both engagement and disengagement), as well as secondary physical and psychological complaints (depression, anxiety, and stress) were assessed. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between conditions with regard to substance use, craving, relapse rates, attentional bias, or physical and psychological complaints. CONCLUSIONS: The findings may reflect unsuccessful modification of attentional bias, the BITT not targeting the relevant process (engagement vs. disengagement bias), or may relate to the diverse treatment goals of the current sample (i.e., moderation or abstinence). The current findings provide no support for the efficacy of this ABM approach as an add-on to TAU in alcohol or cannabis use disorder. Future studies need to delineate the role of engagement and disengagement bias in the persistence of addiction, and the role of treatment goal in the effectiveness of ABM interventions. Public Library of Science 2021-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8177423/ /pubmed/34086751 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252494 Text en © 2021 Heitmann et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Heitmann, Janika van Hemel-Ruiter, Madelon E. Huisman, Mark Ostafin, Brian D. Wiers, Reinout W. MacLeod, Colin DeFuentes-Merillas, Laura Fledderus, Martine Markus, Wiebren de Jong, Peter J. Effectiveness of attentional bias modification training as add-on to regular treatment in alcohol and cannabis use disorder: A multicenter randomized control trial |
title | Effectiveness of attentional bias modification training as add-on to regular treatment in alcohol and cannabis use disorder: A multicenter randomized control trial |
title_full | Effectiveness of attentional bias modification training as add-on to regular treatment in alcohol and cannabis use disorder: A multicenter randomized control trial |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness of attentional bias modification training as add-on to regular treatment in alcohol and cannabis use disorder: A multicenter randomized control trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness of attentional bias modification training as add-on to regular treatment in alcohol and cannabis use disorder: A multicenter randomized control trial |
title_short | Effectiveness of attentional bias modification training as add-on to regular treatment in alcohol and cannabis use disorder: A multicenter randomized control trial |
title_sort | effectiveness of attentional bias modification training as add-on to regular treatment in alcohol and cannabis use disorder: a multicenter randomized control trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8177423/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34086751 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252494 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT heitmannjanika effectivenessofattentionalbiasmodificationtrainingasaddontoregulartreatmentinalcoholandcannabisusedisorderamulticenterrandomizedcontroltrial AT vanhemelruitermadelone effectivenessofattentionalbiasmodificationtrainingasaddontoregulartreatmentinalcoholandcannabisusedisorderamulticenterrandomizedcontroltrial AT huismanmark effectivenessofattentionalbiasmodificationtrainingasaddontoregulartreatmentinalcoholandcannabisusedisorderamulticenterrandomizedcontroltrial AT ostafinbriand effectivenessofattentionalbiasmodificationtrainingasaddontoregulartreatmentinalcoholandcannabisusedisorderamulticenterrandomizedcontroltrial AT wiersreinoutw effectivenessofattentionalbiasmodificationtrainingasaddontoregulartreatmentinalcoholandcannabisusedisorderamulticenterrandomizedcontroltrial AT macleodcolin effectivenessofattentionalbiasmodificationtrainingasaddontoregulartreatmentinalcoholandcannabisusedisorderamulticenterrandomizedcontroltrial AT defuentesmerillaslaura effectivenessofattentionalbiasmodificationtrainingasaddontoregulartreatmentinalcoholandcannabisusedisorderamulticenterrandomizedcontroltrial AT fledderusmartine effectivenessofattentionalbiasmodificationtrainingasaddontoregulartreatmentinalcoholandcannabisusedisorderamulticenterrandomizedcontroltrial AT markuswiebren effectivenessofattentionalbiasmodificationtrainingasaddontoregulartreatmentinalcoholandcannabisusedisorderamulticenterrandomizedcontroltrial AT dejongpeterj effectivenessofattentionalbiasmodificationtrainingasaddontoregulartreatmentinalcoholandcannabisusedisorderamulticenterrandomizedcontroltrial |