Cargando…

Greater travel distance to specialized facilities is associated with higher survival for patients with soft-tissue sarcoma: US nationwide patterns

PURPOSE: The survival impact of geographic access to specialized care remains unknown in patients with soft-tissue sarcomas (STS). This study aimed to clarify the association between the patient travel distance and survival outcome and investigate the factors lying behind it. METHODS: A total of 34...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fujiwara, Tomohiro, Ogura, Koichi, Healey, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8177553/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34086725
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252381
_version_ 1783703404961333248
author Fujiwara, Tomohiro
Ogura, Koichi
Healey, John
author_facet Fujiwara, Tomohiro
Ogura, Koichi
Healey, John
author_sort Fujiwara, Tomohiro
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The survival impact of geographic access to specialized care remains unknown in patients with soft-tissue sarcomas (STS). This study aimed to clarify the association between the patient travel distance and survival outcome and investigate the factors lying behind it. METHODS: A total of 34 528 patients with STS registered in the National Cancer Data Base, diagnosed from 2004–2016, were investigated. RESULTS: Tumor stage correlated with travel distance: patients with metastatic disease stayed closer to home. However, the type of facility showed greatest variation: 37.0%, 51.0%, 73.5%, and 75.9% of patients with ≤10 miles, 10.1–50 miles, 50.1–100 miles, and >100 miles, respectively (P<0.001), had a sarcoma care at academic/research centers. On a multivariable analysis, reduced mortality risk was associated with longer (versus short) travel distance (>100 miles: HR = 0.877; P = 0.001) and management at academic/research (versus non-academic/research) centers (HR = 0.857; P<0.001). The greatest divergence was seen in patients traveling very long distance (>100 miles) to an academic/research center, with a 26.9% survival benefit (HR = 0.731; P<0.001), compared with those traveling short distance (≤10 miles; 95.4% living in metropolitan area) to a non-academic/research center. There was no significant correlation between travel distance and survival in patients who had care at academic/research centers, whereas a survival benefit of management at academic/research centers was observed in every group of travel distance, regardless of tumor stage. CONCLUSIONS: This national study demonstrated that increased travel distance was associated with superior survival, attributable to a higher proportion of patients receiving sarcoma care at distant academic/research centers. These data support centralized care for STS. Overcoming referral and travel barriers may enable more patients to be treated at specialized centers and may further improve survival rates for patients with STS, even when it imposes an increased travel burden.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8177553
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81775532021-06-07 Greater travel distance to specialized facilities is associated with higher survival for patients with soft-tissue sarcoma: US nationwide patterns Fujiwara, Tomohiro Ogura, Koichi Healey, John PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: The survival impact of geographic access to specialized care remains unknown in patients with soft-tissue sarcomas (STS). This study aimed to clarify the association between the patient travel distance and survival outcome and investigate the factors lying behind it. METHODS: A total of 34 528 patients with STS registered in the National Cancer Data Base, diagnosed from 2004–2016, were investigated. RESULTS: Tumor stage correlated with travel distance: patients with metastatic disease stayed closer to home. However, the type of facility showed greatest variation: 37.0%, 51.0%, 73.5%, and 75.9% of patients with ≤10 miles, 10.1–50 miles, 50.1–100 miles, and >100 miles, respectively (P<0.001), had a sarcoma care at academic/research centers. On a multivariable analysis, reduced mortality risk was associated with longer (versus short) travel distance (>100 miles: HR = 0.877; P = 0.001) and management at academic/research (versus non-academic/research) centers (HR = 0.857; P<0.001). The greatest divergence was seen in patients traveling very long distance (>100 miles) to an academic/research center, with a 26.9% survival benefit (HR = 0.731; P<0.001), compared with those traveling short distance (≤10 miles; 95.4% living in metropolitan area) to a non-academic/research center. There was no significant correlation between travel distance and survival in patients who had care at academic/research centers, whereas a survival benefit of management at academic/research centers was observed in every group of travel distance, regardless of tumor stage. CONCLUSIONS: This national study demonstrated that increased travel distance was associated with superior survival, attributable to a higher proportion of patients receiving sarcoma care at distant academic/research centers. These data support centralized care for STS. Overcoming referral and travel barriers may enable more patients to be treated at specialized centers and may further improve survival rates for patients with STS, even when it imposes an increased travel burden. Public Library of Science 2021-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8177553/ /pubmed/34086725 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252381 Text en © 2021 Fujiwara et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Fujiwara, Tomohiro
Ogura, Koichi
Healey, John
Greater travel distance to specialized facilities is associated with higher survival for patients with soft-tissue sarcoma: US nationwide patterns
title Greater travel distance to specialized facilities is associated with higher survival for patients with soft-tissue sarcoma: US nationwide patterns
title_full Greater travel distance to specialized facilities is associated with higher survival for patients with soft-tissue sarcoma: US nationwide patterns
title_fullStr Greater travel distance to specialized facilities is associated with higher survival for patients with soft-tissue sarcoma: US nationwide patterns
title_full_unstemmed Greater travel distance to specialized facilities is associated with higher survival for patients with soft-tissue sarcoma: US nationwide patterns
title_short Greater travel distance to specialized facilities is associated with higher survival for patients with soft-tissue sarcoma: US nationwide patterns
title_sort greater travel distance to specialized facilities is associated with higher survival for patients with soft-tissue sarcoma: us nationwide patterns
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8177553/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34086725
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252381
work_keys_str_mv AT fujiwaratomohiro greatertraveldistancetospecializedfacilitiesisassociatedwithhighersurvivalforpatientswithsofttissuesarcomausnationwidepatterns
AT ogurakoichi greatertraveldistancetospecializedfacilitiesisassociatedwithhighersurvivalforpatientswithsofttissuesarcomausnationwidepatterns
AT healeyjohn greatertraveldistancetospecializedfacilitiesisassociatedwithhighersurvivalforpatientswithsofttissuesarcomausnationwidepatterns