Cargando…
Greater travel distance to specialized facilities is associated with higher survival for patients with soft-tissue sarcoma: US nationwide patterns
PURPOSE: The survival impact of geographic access to specialized care remains unknown in patients with soft-tissue sarcomas (STS). This study aimed to clarify the association between the patient travel distance and survival outcome and investigate the factors lying behind it. METHODS: A total of 34...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8177553/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34086725 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252381 |
_version_ | 1783703404961333248 |
---|---|
author | Fujiwara, Tomohiro Ogura, Koichi Healey, John |
author_facet | Fujiwara, Tomohiro Ogura, Koichi Healey, John |
author_sort | Fujiwara, Tomohiro |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The survival impact of geographic access to specialized care remains unknown in patients with soft-tissue sarcomas (STS). This study aimed to clarify the association between the patient travel distance and survival outcome and investigate the factors lying behind it. METHODS: A total of 34 528 patients with STS registered in the National Cancer Data Base, diagnosed from 2004–2016, were investigated. RESULTS: Tumor stage correlated with travel distance: patients with metastatic disease stayed closer to home. However, the type of facility showed greatest variation: 37.0%, 51.0%, 73.5%, and 75.9% of patients with ≤10 miles, 10.1–50 miles, 50.1–100 miles, and >100 miles, respectively (P<0.001), had a sarcoma care at academic/research centers. On a multivariable analysis, reduced mortality risk was associated with longer (versus short) travel distance (>100 miles: HR = 0.877; P = 0.001) and management at academic/research (versus non-academic/research) centers (HR = 0.857; P<0.001). The greatest divergence was seen in patients traveling very long distance (>100 miles) to an academic/research center, with a 26.9% survival benefit (HR = 0.731; P<0.001), compared with those traveling short distance (≤10 miles; 95.4% living in metropolitan area) to a non-academic/research center. There was no significant correlation between travel distance and survival in patients who had care at academic/research centers, whereas a survival benefit of management at academic/research centers was observed in every group of travel distance, regardless of tumor stage. CONCLUSIONS: This national study demonstrated that increased travel distance was associated with superior survival, attributable to a higher proportion of patients receiving sarcoma care at distant academic/research centers. These data support centralized care for STS. Overcoming referral and travel barriers may enable more patients to be treated at specialized centers and may further improve survival rates for patients with STS, even when it imposes an increased travel burden. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8177553 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81775532021-06-07 Greater travel distance to specialized facilities is associated with higher survival for patients with soft-tissue sarcoma: US nationwide patterns Fujiwara, Tomohiro Ogura, Koichi Healey, John PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: The survival impact of geographic access to specialized care remains unknown in patients with soft-tissue sarcomas (STS). This study aimed to clarify the association between the patient travel distance and survival outcome and investigate the factors lying behind it. METHODS: A total of 34 528 patients with STS registered in the National Cancer Data Base, diagnosed from 2004–2016, were investigated. RESULTS: Tumor stage correlated with travel distance: patients with metastatic disease stayed closer to home. However, the type of facility showed greatest variation: 37.0%, 51.0%, 73.5%, and 75.9% of patients with ≤10 miles, 10.1–50 miles, 50.1–100 miles, and >100 miles, respectively (P<0.001), had a sarcoma care at academic/research centers. On a multivariable analysis, reduced mortality risk was associated with longer (versus short) travel distance (>100 miles: HR = 0.877; P = 0.001) and management at academic/research (versus non-academic/research) centers (HR = 0.857; P<0.001). The greatest divergence was seen in patients traveling very long distance (>100 miles) to an academic/research center, with a 26.9% survival benefit (HR = 0.731; P<0.001), compared with those traveling short distance (≤10 miles; 95.4% living in metropolitan area) to a non-academic/research center. There was no significant correlation between travel distance and survival in patients who had care at academic/research centers, whereas a survival benefit of management at academic/research centers was observed in every group of travel distance, regardless of tumor stage. CONCLUSIONS: This national study demonstrated that increased travel distance was associated with superior survival, attributable to a higher proportion of patients receiving sarcoma care at distant academic/research centers. These data support centralized care for STS. Overcoming referral and travel barriers may enable more patients to be treated at specialized centers and may further improve survival rates for patients with STS, even when it imposes an increased travel burden. Public Library of Science 2021-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8177553/ /pubmed/34086725 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252381 Text en © 2021 Fujiwara et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Fujiwara, Tomohiro Ogura, Koichi Healey, John Greater travel distance to specialized facilities is associated with higher survival for patients with soft-tissue sarcoma: US nationwide patterns |
title | Greater travel distance to specialized facilities is associated with higher survival for patients with soft-tissue sarcoma: US nationwide patterns |
title_full | Greater travel distance to specialized facilities is associated with higher survival for patients with soft-tissue sarcoma: US nationwide patterns |
title_fullStr | Greater travel distance to specialized facilities is associated with higher survival for patients with soft-tissue sarcoma: US nationwide patterns |
title_full_unstemmed | Greater travel distance to specialized facilities is associated with higher survival for patients with soft-tissue sarcoma: US nationwide patterns |
title_short | Greater travel distance to specialized facilities is associated with higher survival for patients with soft-tissue sarcoma: US nationwide patterns |
title_sort | greater travel distance to specialized facilities is associated with higher survival for patients with soft-tissue sarcoma: us nationwide patterns |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8177553/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34086725 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252381 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fujiwaratomohiro greatertraveldistancetospecializedfacilitiesisassociatedwithhighersurvivalforpatientswithsofttissuesarcomausnationwidepatterns AT ogurakoichi greatertraveldistancetospecializedfacilitiesisassociatedwithhighersurvivalforpatientswithsofttissuesarcomausnationwidepatterns AT healeyjohn greatertraveldistancetospecializedfacilitiesisassociatedwithhighersurvivalforpatientswithsofttissuesarcomausnationwidepatterns |